Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 2017 with 6.5" Zone lift and I am running stock 20" wheels with 35x12.50 Toyo R/T.  No spacers needed at all.  No trimming and no rubbing.  I do have 1.5" spacers in the back, but that is just to match the front trackwidth.

  • Like 2
Posted

All stock with 2.5” TG Customz level in front and add a leaf in rear. Minor issue: some banging up front on rough roads, which I think is due to UCA hitting metal stop lightly. May remove 1.5” of the level and go to 1.5” zone body lift but the rake might require the add a leaf to come off.  

BB906C16-804D-4500-B15E-5D949C33B74F.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, Daug207 said:

post-178256-0-52721700-1507075773_thumb.jpegpost-178256-0-38341600-1507075798_thumb.jpegpost-178256-0-23509700-1507075758_thumb.jpegIf you have +27 stock 20’s put in a 1/2” spacer and you will be fine. I have a zone 4.5 with 33’s. No rubbing whatsoever. I just won a 6” BDS from Custom Offsets and they said I can run 35’s with this setup with no rubbing. Good luck.  You’ll have a whole new truck once it’s lifted 

Damn, nice! When are you gonna swap out lifts?? Thanks for the insight. I ran the math a few times but just wanted a sanity check.

Posted
32 minutes ago, lapoolboy said:

I have a 2017 with 6.5" Zone lift and I am running stock 20" wheels with 35x12.50 Toyo R/T.  No spacers needed at all.  No trimming and no rubbing.  I do have 1.5" spacers in the back, but that is just to match the front trackwidth.

Sweet, thanks!! How is the ride quality? 

Posted
Just now, Spate47 said:

Sweet, thanks!! How is the ride quality? 

Rides as smooth as the day I picked it up. Probably even better over train tracks and stuff. MPG is down as expected. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Spate47 said:

Damn, nice! When are you gonna swap out lifts?? Thanks for the insight. I ran the math a few times but just wanted a sanity check.

Just waiting for the shipment. I’m running 34” studded snow tires right now so I’ll probably swap it out soon. It’s a pretty sizable expense but well worth it. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, illMATTic said:

Rides as smooth as the day I picked it up. Probably even better over train tracks and stuff. MPG is down as expected. 

Did you stick with the stocks that came with the lift or upgrade to the hydro or Fox Adventure Series?

Posted
31 minutes ago, Spate47 said:

Sweet, thanks!! How is the ride quality? 

Ride quality is excellent.  Better than stock in my opinion.  I'm about to order Fox coilovers for it, ride should get even better then.

Posted
1 hour ago, Spate47 said:

Did you stick with the stocks that came with the lift or upgrade to the hydro or Fox Adventure Series?

Stock up front and the RC shocks in back. 

Posted (edited)

I have the stock 20 in rims with a 3.5" rough country lift with new struts and UCAs. The tires are Cooper ST Maxx 275/65/R20

IMG_0653.jpg

Edited by fuzzybritches
Posted

fuzzybritches, looks great!  Cooper ST Maxx are the bomb.  I've had three sets.  Went wheeling in the black hills of SD this summer on a set, they were excellent.  

Posted
OEM step boards have since been taken off and replaced with Amp Research.   I need to get a new pic of it now if it will ever quit raining!
IMG_6504.JPG.7f90fe53e83a6952ea1636b996f8f1d9.JPG

Looking forward to seeing more pics. This is about the exact setup I want.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

Yeah leevon I love these tires so far. Perfect balance of off-road and highway performance. If only they didn’t cost 1400 a set.... ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...