Jump to content

K2XX 5.3L Pic Request - Flex Fuel sensor mounted on the frame


Recommended Posts

Posted

 

Right, I think it was stated earlier in this thread that the part numbers for are identical for both systems. So at this point, unless proven otherwise, the reality is that they are all the same. There is only value in discussing "why" GM would do this and if it meant higher cost, I would bet they wouldn't. Therefore, the cost must be a wash.

For what it's worth, and my source at the moment is advance auto [emoji12] . When I look up fuel injectors for my 03 Tahoe. Changing the vehicle from vin z to t(flex or non) I get a completely different list of fuel injectors. None listed are the same part number between those 2 engines.

 

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

In 2014 all 5.3's were flexfuel.

 

Maybe there are no E10 only versions of the components. (other than those required to remove the sensor)

Posted

I just ordered all the parts for the conversion.

Posted

I just ordered all the parts for the conversion.

Can you list part #'s and vendors please. I will be doing this upgrade also and am too busy (lazy) to research. Pics would be cool also.

Posted

Can you list part #'s and vendors please. I will be doing this upgrade also and am too busy (lazy) to research. Pics would be cool also.

I'll post pics of the parts and part numbers once they arrive.

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

Posted

You guys doing the conversion must be doing it for the power results because it can't be for the fuel costs. E85 is the same or more in East Tennessee the last time I checked. Then it's not available everywhere here either.

Posted

You guys doing the conversion must be doing it for the power results because it can't be for the fuel costs. E85 is the same or more in East Tennessee the last time I checked. Then it's not available everywhere here either.

Depends on how your area taxes ethanol.

Someplaces the cost/mile to run E85 is less than running E10 or E0.

Posted

For what it's worth, and my source at the moment is advance auto [emoji12] . When I look up fuel injectors for my 03 Tahoe. Changing the vehicle from vin z to t(flex or non) I get a completely different list of fuel injectors. None listed are the same part number between those 2 engines.

 

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

Honestly that isn't worth much of anything since you are talking about 12 year old vehicles who were the first generation for the E85. It's a completely different ball game now.

 

What about a 2014/15 Silverado or Sierra. That is what we are talking about. Maybe something changed.

I just looked up the parts for the 2014 5.3L vs 6.2L and they both use the same injectors.

Posted

You might be surprised how many parts have been exactly the same for the last 12 years .....

If the latest generation trucks only need the sensor to be flex fuel, why wouldn't gm make them all flex fuel compatible ? I've spent a lot of time in automotive plants. That 100 dollar part isn't worth changing up what's done on the line. Even multiplied over all the trucks made. The difference in sourcing, shipping, storing,and putting on 2 different parts cost WAY more than what they saved.

But hey, I've also seen them do things that made less since for lesser a reason. So who knows.

 

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

Posted

Still waiting on tracking info from gm parts direct.

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

Posted

Got tracking info, will be delivered Monday

 

For giggles, I looked at gas prices today.

 

2.19 87 Oct

2.79 91 Oct (which I usually run)

1.79 E85

 

 

 

Sent from Tapatalk App - Samsung S6

Posted

The price of E85 here is only 10c more (will likely soon drop) but the price of 93-octane is only $2.39.

Posted

I need to get a sensor and tune for my 02 along with bigger injectors. It runs great on E85 just don't get the full benefits without the extra parts. E85 here is $1.54 a gallon and 93 is $2.65 even with the mpg hit, it is still cheaper to run E85 for me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I included the first gen-cylinder de-activation (active fuel management) in my statement.
    • Hello All!   My 2019 Colorado 3.6 LT, 4WD Crew Cab has approximately 77,500 miles and I recently began experiencing the well-known transmission shudder between about 30 and 65 mph. The problem had worsened to the point that I could no longer attribute it to road conditions - and I had decided to bring the truck to the dealer - when recently, I experienced a sudden loss of power while driving at maybe 40 MPH. Several warning lights flashed, the “Check Stabilitrack” message appeared, and the Check Engine, Stabilitrack, and Traction Control icons remained illuminated. The truck regained driving power, but it stayed in a low gear with unusually high RPMs for the speed. (limp mode?) Because I was only about two miles from home, driving slowly, I was able to make it back and run an OBD-II scan, which showed fault codes U0101, P0700, and U0100. My next trip in the truck was to drive it to the dealer the following day. That trip began normally, but after about a mile I experienced another loss of power, along with the same warning lights and the same “Check Stabilitrack” message. As before the truck remained driveable, but again operated at an abnormally high RPM-to-speed ratio and seemed stuck in a single gear. About a mile later, the dashboard lit up once more, this time displaying “Check 4WD.” Soon after that, I arrived at the dealer. I have verified that the truck still has its original factory transmission fluid, which means it has never received the corrective fluid exchange outlined in GM Technical Service Bulletin #18-NA-355.  That was Thursday of last week and I've heard nothing yet from the dealer.    According to Technical Service Bulletin #18-NA-355 and the build date of my truck, my truck should have the newer LV fluid. I've done a little research and read something about a problem with the wiring harness as well.   Anyone have an insights into this situation?  Thank you!!
    • Having bumper and other body damages can be very frustrating, especially as a result of a parking lot collision/bump. Our team wants to learn more about the damages to your truck so we can look into ways we might be able to help. When you get the chance, please fill out our support form with more details: https://s.gmc.com/support-request . A member of our team will follow up with you as soon as next available. We want to get you enjoying your truck to the fullest again. 
    • Did you even read this article?   Even the title of the article says "U.S.-Iran Deal Doesn’t Mean a Swift Return of Oil and Gas Flows"   Remember, crude oil prices are based on FUTURE purchases by the oil companies.  Gas prices are based on FUTURE purchases by the station.  This article stated that many of the oil producing nations have to restart their processes to get the oil produced.  Then the oil has to be shipped to wherever.  And it doesn't get there overnight.  And most of that oil is not coming here. Check out this site:  https://afdc.energy.gov/data/10621   A graph will pop up to show where the US imports their oil from.  Notice that there isn't a lot of import from OPEC and Iraq.  Most of the US import comes from Canada. The US oil produces are selling their oil on the open market, which is why the US fuel costs went up.  So you're correct, the US oil companies are going to slow walk the price downward.
    • Having codes and an engine light with no hints on what might be causing it is nothing short of frustrating. How long have these concerns been present? We want to know more so we can look into ways we might be able to help you. When you get the chance, please fill out our support form with additional details on your experience so far. A member of our team will follow up with you as soon as next available: https://s.gmc.com/support-request 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...