Jump to content

Suspension/Ride Quality Improvement

jburch77

By jburch77
in Modifications & Accessories

Recommended Posts

fondupot Senior Enthusiast

fondupot

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the info. I will definitely rule out stacking them. So the ride is noticeably better? I may go this route.

 

I found the ride to be a lot better with the Bilsteins. You could spend some more money and go with a fox or a king shock, and i've heard those ride even better.

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
EChavez Enthusiast

EChavez

Posted
Posted

Upgrade yourself to some Bilstein 5100's. The OEM ranchos are junk. and the leveling kit you have isnt helping.

 

If you add the 5100's they have a built in leveling adjustment, so you will need to remove your leveling kit. There are four settings, 0", 3/4", 1.5" and 1.8". I have them and I have them set to the middle 1.5" setting. Truck rides great. Handles the bumps and potholes a lot better too.

 

 

Alternatively, if you are keen on keeping your current leveling kit, you can replace your shocks with Bilstein 4600's which do not have any height adjustment and are direct replacements for the struts. The only difference between the 5100 and the 4600 is the adjustable aspect. Otherwise they are valved the same.

 

I prefer the 5100 method, because it makes the strut and the leveling kit all in one unit. No funky block or bracket to mess with. Everything bolts into the stock locations.

 

What if you go with Bilstein 4600's and just replace the stock ranchos but keep the spacer kit installed? Will it improve the ride? I only ask because I have a 2.5" kit and the truck isn't dead level. So if I used the 5100's and maxed them out at 1.8" I'm assuming they not only won't ride well because they're maxed but the truck still wont be level. Or am I missing something?

fondupot Senior Enthusiast

fondupot

Posted
Posted

 

What if you go with Bilstein 4600's and just replace the stock ranchos but keep the spacer kit installed? Will it improve the ride? I only ask because I have a 2.5" kit and the truck isn't dead level. So if I used the 5100's and maxed them out at 1.8" I'm assuming they not only won't ride well because they're maxed but the truck still wont be level. Or am I missing something?

 

You could do that.

 

But I've heard from others that have maxed out bilsteins say it rides fine.

EChavez Enthusiast

EChavez

Posted
Posted

 

You could do that.

 

But I've heard from others that have maxed out bilsteins say it rides fine.

 

I've just been going through options, I eventually want to upgrade the shocks but the only thing holding me back is the leveling amount of the shocks. I just don't want an nosediving truck :nonod:

Eddie 70 Senior Enthusiast

Eddie 70

Posted
Posted

The Ranchos are white. The black ones are junk monotube shocks. When I swapped the montubes out this summer one was shock already one its way out at 10k miles.

 

Thanks for the reply. I knew they were rough riding IMO. I'm not really interested in lifting the truck, I would rather have a nicer ride than what I currently have. Take some of the jarring out of the bumps. I think Bilsteins should be on my short list. Any recommendations? I had thought about leveling by lowering the rear with shackles.

HondaHawkGT Senior Enthusiast

HondaHawkGT

Posted
Posted

The Bilstein 5100's are supposed to give a good ride. Probably the best bang for the buck. The 9000xl Ranchos are a good alternative but I wouldn't buy them until June/July when they have their summer rebate promotion.

Tek74 Enthusiast

Tek74

Posted
Posted

If you add the 5100's they have a built in leveling adjustment, so you will need to remove your leveling kit. There are four settings, 0", 3/4", 1.5" and 1.8". I have them and I have them set to the middle 1.5" setting. Truck rides great. Handles the bumps and potholes a lot better too.

 

Good info, but when I look at their website (below), it says 0" - 2.5"

Why do you say 1.8" is the max height increment?

 

http://www.bilsteinus.com/products/truck-off-road/5100-series-ride-height-adjustable/

 

Travis Whitmore Enthusiast

Travis Whitmore

Posted
Posted

I checked into Fox, unless you are lifted 6" they don't offer anything.

Not true at all. I just ordered the Fox 2.0 coil overs and matching rear shocks. The coil overs are adjustable from 0-2".

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

fondupot Senior Enthusiast

fondupot

Posted
Posted

 

Good info, but when I look at their website (below), it says 0" - 2.5"

Why do you say 1.8" is the max height increment?

 

http://www.bilsteinus.com/products/truck-off-road/5100-series-ride-height-adjustable/

That says "depending on application."

 

They make 5100s for a variety of trucks. Some might have different adjustment heights. But if you drill down and find the part number specific for GM 1500 trucks. I believe the max height is 1.8". See link.

 

http://www.suspensionconnection.com/24-238304-sierra-5100.html

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dezrado Enthusiast

Dezrado

Posted
Posted

9B5F0847-B394-4A58-8BCD-017C391ADEA6.jpg

 

Stop joking around with bilsteins and ranchos and cognitos, get a bajakits midtravel kit with kings. Problem solved

58E56D35-261B-45AF-BD52-54D3F3F44CFB.jpg

F6252274-619A-4283-A60C-B23ACA97A6C3.jpg

6E53CA36-3551-4F75-B1A7-7165737876B7.jpg

Fire2968 Enthusiast

Fire2968

Posted
Posted

Cant you get 5100s that are non adjustable? 4wheelparts shows both adjustable and non.

 

http://www.4wheelparts.com/Suspension/Shock-Absorbers.aspx?t_c=1&t_s=90&t_pt=3306&Manufacturer_AMAN=Bilstein

 

Just curious because I too would like to get Bilstein's but am worried about the Level/Shock issue.

 

Currently have RC 2.5" with Rear block installed.

Clocked92 Enthusiast

Clocked92

Posted
Posted

I checked into Fox, unless you are lifted 6" they don't offer anything.

 

This is not true. Fox offers 2.0 shocks that are adjustable and will give you a 2" level just from the coilover.

Clocked92 Enthusiast

Clocked92

Posted
Posted

Not true at all. I just ordered the Fox 2.0 coil overs and matching rear shocks. The coil overs are adjustable from 0-2".

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Can you start up a thread once you get them and install on your truck? I've been looking at going this direction for awhile but I'm waiting until my warranty is close to the end.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...