Jump to content

Looking to actually gain some MPG


Recommended Posts

Posted

Tonneau covers helped more back when trucks weren't put into wind tunnels - now they all are. The "spoiler" on your tailgate now does what the tonneau cover used to do - smooth the air over the back of the truck.

 

No "power" mods (intake, exhaust, tune) will help with FE. You can only hope to not make it worse. If they did, OEMs would do it. Larger /heavier tires will make it worse.

 

Your only options are to keep your stock tires, keep them aired up, and drive it like your grandma.

 

I really think the Range AFM-plus (http://www.rangetechnology.com/pages/v4) may help with FE, but no telling what it will do to your engine long-term.

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

I lost about .5 mpg on the highway (200+ mile trips, north/south as well as east/west) according to the DIC when I went back to the stock intake from my K&N. Sounds weird but those are the numbers.

Posted

I average 16 in town, about 17-18 highway. Never seen, over the course of a full tank, anything greater than 20mpg average. That was also all mountain driving which I thought was pretty good for cruising 80mph

I have the 6.2 8A in my GMC. This weekend I did a trip on the NYS Thruway and got an indicated 22.2 MPG going 72mph -running Sunoco 91octane.

Posted

At about 12,000 miles my average is 17mpg. Most of those miles are commuting 106 round trip miles to and from work over mountains and stuck in traffic. I'd say it's pretty good for a lot of stop and go traffic and I will step on it when I merge onto the freeway. Best I got from the DIC is 24.1 for a 50 mile range was coming down from a trip up into the mountains with no stop signs or stop lights to effect any change in throttle much. Just coasting and cruising. But I've averaged 19-21 with cruise control at 75mph on the highway. Still stock for now.

Posted

What about going to different gears in the rearend? might lower your RPMs at highway speed

Then someone, such as myself, who uses their truck for towing will not be able to tow what they need to. You'd be going to a higher gear (lower numerically) causing the truck to struggle. We shouldn't have to modify our trucks to keep them from shaking lol
Posted

Then someone, such as myself, who uses their truck for towing will not be able to tow what they need to. You'd be going to a higher gear (lower numerically) causing the truck to struggle. We shouldn't have to modify our trucks to keep them from shaking lol

I agree but at the same time regearing could work? I have the tow package on mine. Do you guys get that weird lurch too when going from 1st to 2nd gear?

Posted

What about going to different gears in the rearend? might lower your RPMs at highway speed

Rear gearing the front and rear-diff would be $2,000 +

 

That buys a lot of gas!

Posted

And you have max tow? Talk about neutering your truck. Do not re-gear for fuel economy. Either try the Range technology AFM+ module or leave it alone and drive line a granny. Gas is cheap now anyway.

Posted

And you have max tow? Talk about neutering your truck. Do not re-gear for fuel economy. Either try the Range technology AFM+ module or leave it alone and drive line a granny. Gas is cheap now anyway.

I'm kind of doubting it's Max Tow... Expecting it's "just" the tow package (which doesn't actually mean much).

Posted

Installing the Elite E2-X system will give 1-3 MPG improvement as it eliminates most knock retard by keeping the oil mist out of the compression stroke so the timing advance can always be optimum. More power and better fuel economy anytime you can run the most advance possible. Fleet owners buy and install these for fuel savings only as they trade every 3 years on average so they are not as concerned with long term damage for the intake valve coking issues.

Posted

 

Yeah, that just is not true. If it even got 2 mpg then bean counters be damned they would find $20 to mass install those in every vehicle (especially the new ones with DI). It could then leap which ever vehicle they are installing them in over most of their competitors in terms of class leading mpg, think of the advertising and sales!

 

Why such the large spread? Not confident in what it can return? That is a large difference from the low end to the high end. That is like saying if you buy this intake it will give you anywhere from 10 to 30 hp!

 

Who do you work for? Every post you are telling people to buy the "Elite E2-X catch can", that is all you participate in is talks relating to catch cans. Kind of difficult to buy claims that extravagant when you are a spokesperson... Are you with in the rules of the forum to do this if you are selling for someone?

 

OP, do what you feel comfortable with. If you want to drink the kool aid of salesman knock your self out. It is a truck, mpg will be minimally impacted in most anything you do. If you want larger gains it will be at the expense of other capabilities the truck was designed for (towing, hauling, off road, longevity, ect). With mpg being so important these days (and a fairly large selling point) you can be damned sure the engineers are doing as much as they can with in the hundreds of millions of dollars of their budget to get everything they can out of the mpg to top its competitors, not to mention keeping the capabilities near or above the top of the field.

 

Tyler

 

 

Very well typed post. If you wanted more MPG's should have bought a Civic..

 

I purchased my truck to use it for a TRUCK, towing, hauling, and working at times. I think my truck bone stock gets great MPG's, 20 years ago it was unheard of to get this mileage out of a V8 truck..

 

I'm very happy with my silverado and don't want to change a thing except for some real all-terrain tires..

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,860
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    HWN808
    Newest Member
    HWN808
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 2 Anonymous, 1,036 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Diesel $5.42 at the truck stop on the hi-way
    • I'm not sure if this should be a new topic, let me know if it's out of place. This my first post. Thanks 85077522 - AC Delco GM Genuine Parts Brake Master Cylinders. Anyone else had to replace this brake master cylinder yet. I didn't do any brake work, it looks like new parts and I've had the truck for about 4k miles, 119k total miles.  When it started to throw codes I did the calibrations with a bidirectional scanner and got the codes to clear but they came back so I did the routine; base bleed, automated bleed and final base bleed. All that with Bosch ES16-32N fluid (please look it up). That seemed to fix it but 100ish miles later it failed again so I ran the same process but with a pressure bleeder this time and got the same results, fixed for 100ish miles. The original fluid looked bad and I thought I got most of it out, it could've been the wrong fluid. The codes; P25A2, C05B0-00, C2A1B. I can get them to clear but not for long. The C05B0 indicates a leak in the front circuit (which is bone dry) so I'm thinking of doing the bleed process on that front again today and I don't know if that's taboo to just do the front but at this point it seems like it's worth the try anyway. The new master cylinder/module unit is supposed to get here today. But now I'm pretty much convinced this install is over my head. I've called several shops and some mobile guys that I know but this thing is like radio active material, scary wise. I did get 2 local shops say they should be able to do it, one says he has the SPS2 programing capability. And with the battery disconnected is there supposed to be pedal resistance, mine is to the floor, then if I pump it I can get some resistance. I had a panic stop prior to this issue which may have contributed from what I read. And on the first attempt to bleed and hydraulic test the scanner listed things to look for and one was any gaps between the pad and rotors which I did notice on the RF corner and I removed the outer pad (where the gap was) cleaned it and the hardware and didn't see a gap after that but will re-check it. I read that if pushing the caliper pistons back then you're supposed to open the bleeder so as to not push fluid backwards into the abs module or it will damage it. If that's true then that's also a possibility from the previous owner having the brakes changed before I got it. I'm using an XTool ip500 scanner. Any suggestions, questions and comments welcome. 
    • Next Friday will be my 6 week point from my right knee replacement.  The surgeon says it will be fine if I choose to drive after this checkup.  I know I could drive now but best to do as my surgeon (and my wife) tell me.  Richard compared being 62 to 72.  I remember when I was in my early 60's I was experiencing slow but regular decline in my mobility.  Thanks to good medical support,  i continued to fight the speed and spread of this decline. During my 60's I worked on non-surgical methods and just when I turned 70, my orthopedic surgeon recommended joint replacements.  In a little over a year, I had one shoulder and both knees replaced.  This hasn't been a terribly fun experience, but worth the discomfort as my future mobility health trajectory has reversed.  It is a treat to now be watching my mobility. balance and confidence steadily improve!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...