Jump to content

Bed cover with sport bar?

Viperdoc
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

SF GMC
SF GMC

I put the rail under the forward mounts notched it for the rear mount. Just need to add a bead of silicone to seal it up

Thomcat
Thomcat

Looks something like the "sail" on my old Avalanche or the "wings" on my '69 Chevelle, but a lot meaner. Like the photos show.....mean

SF GMC
SF GMC

Posted Images

TXGREEK Senior Enthusiast

TXGREEK

Posted
Posted

RollNLock on my 18 standard bed crew cab 5c24e711ad46176634fe8fb4feed0f89.png


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
  • 10 months later...
Euge Enthusiast

Euge

Posted
Posted
On 21/3/2017 at 15:16, Michael Schimborski said:

Exactamente, los delanteros yacen justo en la parte superior, los montajes traseros son los que se envuelven alrededor del borde de la cama para vigilar. Odio la molestia de publicar fotos aquí, así que si quieres más fotos, simplemente mándame tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono y te las enviaré.

Hello, I have that same truck, and I bought the cover, you could send me some pictures to install it. 9086307217

  • 4 months later...
Toadtits New Member

Toadtits

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hey guys I have the same sports bar and am having an issue finding a bed cover that isn’t stopped by the foward part of the sports bar during roll up. Does the one you have installed have any issues rolling up to the window if not can you forward the info on it ty

6A2B70BF-4E4D-4849-AADA-857D16EB2EE9.jpeg

Edited by Toadtits
Toadtits New Member

Toadtits

Posted
Posted

Also I had Chevy install mine and they cut off the foward bracket that grabs the bed rail and instead drilled and dropped bolt from the top of the rail instead of the side making a inside rail cover capable without having to modify the bed cover at all will send pics soon

0237C836-C1DA-46F0-977D-C01954CE3E9C.jpeg

  • 1 year later...
Joe Bison New Member

Joe Bison

Posted
Posted


I like this cover.  I have the sports bar as well and im having a hard time figuring out how you have this attache with the sports bar? did you have to modify the cover?  can you take pictures of the front driver side area of the cover and the sports bar.. thanks

  • 1 year later...
Viktorrocks15 Enthusiast

Viktorrocks15

Posted
Posted
On 1/29/2017 at 4:06 PM, BNish97 said:

Can you send me some pics and exactly how you did it. I just tried today but I can't roll the cover up all the way. I want to try and keep it as clean as possible.

 

Here's my email

 

[email protected]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


do you have some pictures?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Chuck FB
      Joke Thread

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...