Jump to content

Should I use Tow/Haul mode everyday?

tflux
 Share

Recommended Posts

tflux New Member

tflux

Posted
Posted

I read somewhere that Tow/Haul mode is actually easier on the transmission due to less "slippage" during gear shifts. The argument was that the shift will feel more harsh, but there is actually less wear and tear on the transmission.

 

Anybody know if this is true?

 

Should I always use Tow/Haul mode even during "easy" driving?

 

I'm assuming the gas mileage will be a little less due to the increased revving of the motor, but I'm not too worried about that. I don't drive many miles.

 

Thanks!

 

SouthernSilveradoGuy85 Senior Enthusiast

SouthernSilveradoGuy85

Posted
Posted

Not to sound like a smartass (even though I am), but if GM thought it should be in that mode all the time then they wouldn't have it as a mode that you can turn on and off.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Chevy Joe Enthusiast

Chevy Joe

Posted
Posted

No reason to leave it in tow mode, not sure the higher RPM is "good" for the trans or the engine

All the mode does is change the shift points in the transmission to make the transmission stay in the lower gear for a longer time. For Example (these are made up numbers) with it off your tranmission may shift from 1st to 2nd at 10mph then to 3rd at 25mph then to 4th at 40mph. With it on it would shift from 1st to 2nd at 20mph then to 3rd at 45mph then to 4th at 55mph

tflux New Member

tflux

Posted
  • Author
Posted

All the mode does is change the shift points in the transmission to make the transmission stay in the lower gear for a longer time.

 

I think tow/haul mode does more than this. I think it makes the shift quicker (harder) also.

 

I appreciate the responses. Let me revise my question...

 

I read once that a "smooth" shift (normal mode) puts more wear on the friction material in the transmission. A "hard" shift (tow/haul mode) puts less wear on the friction material in the transmission.

 

Does anybody know if this is true?

SouthernSilveradoGuy85 Senior Enthusiast

SouthernSilveradoGuy85

Posted
Posted

The only time I can see when a harder shift wouldn't hurt as much is at WOT. When I had my 98 Z71 something with the trans went bad and seemed like at least once per day it would shift so hard it would shake the truck. I then had to pull over, cut the truck off for a couple minutes and then it would shift smooth. Eventually the trans finally went completely out.

 

So anyways, with normal driving, especially in town, I can only imagine that harder shifting wouldn't be easier on the trans. The trans will shift harder at WOT to make it smoother. I believe more throttle the more pressure and harder it needs to shift to keep it shifting smooth.

 

Like I said in my first post, if GM thought it would be better to do all that all the time then they wouldn't have it as a mode that you can turn on and off. It should only be on if you're towing a trailer. An empty light trailer you shouldn't have to, but you'll feel it strain so that's when you turn it on.

Chevy Joe Enthusiast

Chevy Joe

Posted
Posted

 

I think tow/haul mode does more than this.

 

 

Then why are you asking here? You should use GOOGLE and search the internet...SMH

 

The info I gave you was from a Certified GM mechanic that works for my local dealer

 

I'm Out...

Chevor Senior Enthusiast

Chevor

Posted
Posted

I use it alot for stop and go traffic.

  • 3 years later...
Aaron Brown New Member

Aaron Brown

Posted
Posted

I use tow/haul mode every time I drive my truck. The fuel mileage loss isn’t that different. And the majority of dealership mechanics are idiots. So I wouldn’t base any decision on their recommendations. Also the fact that it’s not in this mode from the factory indicates, as far as I’m concerned anyway, to use it. The factory clamps every part of our trucks to make them more eco friendly. Tow/haul shifts exactly how I do driving a manual. In normal mode it’s shifting constantly, and doesn’t shift down soon enough on inclines. Manuals last longer because of how you hold the gear longer, so that leads me to believe an automatic would do the same. Just my 2 cents. 

diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Tow/Haul mode for towing IMO.

My manual says to use it when,

Tow/Haul is designed to be most effective when the vehicle and trailer combined weight is at least 75 percent of the vehicle's Gross Combined Weight Rating(GCWR). 

Nothing is perfect but I figure the engineers know more than me about the design of my truck.

 

:)

XJ2.5 Enthusiast

XJ2.5

Posted
Posted

As far as I know tow/haul changes the shift points and increases fluid pressure in the transmission. Not sure to what extent it would increase the life of the transmission, but it would definitely reduce slippage. The way GM set these transmissions up from the factory is straight up garbage. They prioritized smooth shifts over longevity, thats why i have a corvette servo and transpo hd2 shift kit in mine. Installing a shift kit will do much more to extend the life of the transmission than leaving it in tow/haul.

Sent from my LM-G710VM using Tapatalk

  • 3 years later...
Armando Guerrero New Member

Armando Guerrero

Posted
Posted

Of course it's great for towing, but I also use it to get a little more performance when I need it. It changes the shift ability of your gears so you can get the most out of all your 8 cylinders,all the time..at the cost of a little fuel economy. It'll stay in the higher end of the lower gears longer than it normally would, so it almost shifts like I would on my bike or in a Manuel trans... No sluggish gear searching. 

It really gives my 02 Silverado 1500 4.8L V8 that pep that I miss from the 02 1500 5.3L V8 I had right before this one... especially when Im going waaay to slow and need to merge with the speed of fast traffic from an on ramp to the freeway 

Autocop Enthusiast

Autocop

Posted
Posted (edited)

Tow/Haul mode performs two primary functions. First, it will cause the gearbox to upshift later and downshift earlier than usual, keeping the engine in its power band. This makes it easier for the vehicle to tow or haul whatever is in the back, albeit at the expense of some fuel economy. On downhills, Tow/Haul mode selects a lower gear for a stronger engine-braking effect. This reduces the demands on the brakes, which reduces the odds of the brake pads or fluid overheating.

Second, the gearbox won’t shift as much as it would regularly, which helps keep transmission temperatures at a safe level. Some Tow/Haul applications even lock out the top gears for similar heat-management reasons.

Edited by Autocop
  • 2 weeks later...
Bad Bowtie2 Enthusiast

Bad Bowtie2

Posted
Posted

Better suggestion is to leave your transmission in "regular drive mode" and have your transmission's fluid flushed every 75K. New fluid is the lifeblood of a transmission. I recommend a bottle of Lucas brand Transmission Conditioner at this time too....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • SFC Retired
      2023 DRW Wheel Liners

      By SFC Retired · Posted

      Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • KARNUT
      OCI, not when but why?

      By KARNUT · Posted

      As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • bluev8
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By bluev8 · Posted

      That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...