Jump to content

2015-2016 Silverado Leveled with a 33" Tire Roof Height?


dirtfan21

Recommended Posts

Posted

My good friend is looking to purchase a 2015 or 2016 Silverado HD gasser. His plans are to level it 2-2.5" and do a 295/55/20 or 285/65/18 depending on the factory wheel size, may do an aftermarket wheel in a +18 or +14 offset. Those of you that have this modification, what are your roof heights? He only has a 7' tall door and is concerned it will not fit. I previously owned a 2008 HD with a level and 33's, it fit fine in my 7' door, but I know the newer body style trucks seem to net a higher stance when leveled.

 

Long story short, those of you who have this type of modification, do you fit in a standard 7' garage door?

Posted

will a 285/65/18 - 2" level , clear parking ramps mark 6'8" ????? ANY of you guys have this set up , and tell me how tall your truck is. local tire shop's have many answer , no one knows.

Posted

I have a 2014 2500 leveled on 33's and it barley fits in parking garages.. It's hit or miss. If I can make it without hitting the height marker it's usually a few inches from it.

Posted

Thanks for the info guys. He actually just remodeled his entire house and didn't want to rip out the 7' doors to install 8' doors. Is ticked at himself for not thinking about it when the time was right.

Posted

My 2016 Denali is leveled with 275/60R20 BFG KO2s on stock wheels. These are 33" where the stock 265/60R20 Goodyear's were about 32" tall. The rear of the cab is right at 6'8," but the stock antenna is another 4"+ taller...may need a shorter antenna.

post-162305-0-53047900-1473136458_thumb.jpg

post-162305-0-53047900-1473136458_thumb.jpg

post-162305-0-53047900-1473136458_thumb.jpg

post-162305-0-53047900-1473136458_thumb.jpg

Posted

I was worried about this before I bought my truck. I did a 2" level and 285/70/18 and I have a few extra inches. I could have done a 4" lift with 35's no problem. I have a standard 7ft door. The antenna does rub though.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...