Jump to content

Choosing between SLT and Denali..


Recommended Posts

Posted

Denali features not found on SLT:

 

Color matched bumpers

Chrome lower bumper plate

Chrome mesh grille

Large digital dash cluster

Denali steering wheel horn cover

Denali stitched front head rests

Leather wrapped shift lever

Leather seating surfaces with unique stitching

Darker aluminum dash trim

Chrome center console lid handle

Door sill plates with aluminum inserts

Darker wood look trim pieces

Magnaride suspension

Denali specific wheels

Denali exterior badging

 

Is that enough to justify the price diff? One has to make the call.

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Lol....Buying a $55k truck and worried about the extra $6-$7 to fill it up.

Posted

Lol....Buying a $55k truck and worried about the extra $6-$7 to fill it up.

I believe it is OK concerned about fuel costs even if you have the ability to pay. I respect that driving a high powered vehicle is a lot of fun for those who choose to prioritize there finances to this purpose. Using myself as an example, I get all the pleasure of owning and driving a 4X4 2015 Sierra that I want but have the V6 engine. If I am saving a further $6-$7 a fill up, this is a bonus!

Posted

I believe it is OK concerned about fuel costs even if you have the ability to pay. I respect that driving a high powered vehicle is a lot of fun for those who choose to prioritize there finances to this purpose. Using myself as an example, I get all the pleasure of owning and driving a 4X4 2015 Sierra that I want but have the V6 engine. If I am saving a further $6-$7 a fill up, this is a bonus!

 

 

Agreed. There are many truck owners that drive 30-40k plus miles per year. It definitely has to be considered if the fun from the 6.2 is worth another $50 per month in fuel, plus the price of the 6.2 option itself. I love the 6.2, but my 5.3 is no slouch and has never left me feeling under-powered. Similarly for the guys that own the 4.3 and are happy with it.

Posted

Lol....Buying a $55k truck and worried about the extra $6-$7 to fill it up.

Who was worried about it? Just stating the fact. It is something to consider if you do not need the 6.2. It will cost you maybe $3000 more over 5 years plus the cost of the bigger engine to purchase.

Posted

Lol....Buying a $55k truck and worried about the extra $6-$7 to fill it up.

 

I'm not knocking the 6.2L, I drove one and they are fun to drive. I just personally couldn't justify the extra $3,000 for only a slightly bigger engine when I may pull my boat 2-3 times a year for 100 miles round trip....and was only trying to put things in perspective for the OP.

 

Not to mention if you figure up the added savings over a 100,000 miles life of the truck you would save in excess of $5,000 by going with the smaller engine. I don't know about you but trucks aren't the only toys I like to play with and $5,000 buys a couple nice guns and plenty of ammo to put through them......and I would still have a truck.

 

But, to your point, to each his own.

Posted

Here are my 2 cents

 

I special ordered my 2015 GMC CCSB SLT. I went with the SLT because I WANTED the bench seat. I WANTED Summit white and not pearl white. I also built it with all the other options that the denali has (sunroof, rear slider, etc.) MSRP on my truck after I built it was 57k.

 

I am very happy with my decision, the bench seat was the main deciding factor to me so I can haul 6 people, which I have a few times now.

Posted

Denali features not found on SLT:

 

Color matched bumpers

Chrome lower bumper plate

Chrome mesh grille

Large digital dash cluster

Denali steering wheel horn cover

Denali stitched front head rests

Leather wrapped shift lever

Leather seating surfaces with unique stitching

Darker aluminum dash trim

Chrome center console lid handle

Door sill plates with aluminum inserts

Darker wood look trim pieces

Magnaride suspension

Denali specific wheels

Denali exterior badging

 

Is that enough to justify the price diff? One has to make the call.

There are also a bunch of options that are standard on Denali and available at extra cost on an SLT

Posted

I believe it is OK concerned about fuel costs even if you have the ability to pay. I respect that driving a high powered vehicle is a lot of fun for those who choose to prioritize there finances to this purpose. Using myself as an example, I get all the pleasure of owning and driving a 4X4 2015 Sierra that I want but have the V6 engine. If I am saving a further $6-$7 a fill up, this is a bonus!

Well I am not sure why people are convinced that the 6.2 420 hp 8spd 5800lb 0-60 in 5.6 seconds beast of a truck gets bad fuel mileage?

post-127028-0-28094300-1476485477_thumb.jpg

 

On the original OP's question SLT or Denali if you are trying to save money you can of course get a SLT for less money. If money is not that big of a concern then get the Denali. Most likely you can swear off cigs and beer for a few months and save the difference pretty easily....

 

 

 

post-127028-0-28094300-1476485477_thumb.jpg

Posted

My slt has colour matched bumpers, mind you I custom ordered it and waited 3 months for it

Posted

Well I am not sure why people are convinced that the 6.2 420 hp 8spd 5800lb 0-60 in 5.6 seconds beast of a truck gets bad fuel mileage?

attachicon.gifTrip A Nashville to Chicago10-5-16.JPG

 

On the original OP's question SLT or Denali if you are trying to save money you can of course get a SLT for less money. If money is not that big of a concern then get the Denali. Most likely you can swear off cigs and beer for a few months and save the difference pretty easily....

 

 

 

I personally believe the 6.2 gets great mileage for the size. However, where I live it costs 18 cents a litre more for 91 octane than 87. At a fill of 80 litres this works out to $14.40 per fill. You're also correct that if I wanted to change my priorities, I could direct funds to increased fuel costs.

Posted

Yes, 6.2 takes the premium gas not the cheap stuff.

You can run regular, the computer adjusts the hp to the gas. Premium is recommended but but not necessarily needed.

Posted

You can run regular, the computer adjusts the hp to the gas. Premium is recommended but but not necessarily needed.

Yea no thanks, I'm not going to detonate my motor over 7 bucks in gas,I run 94 in my 6.2.

It runs like a raped ape, I had a tranny relearn because it wasn't behaving, now it squawks through the 1st three gears if I'm on it, she's getting to 99 mph in under 7-9 seconds

Posted

Yea no thanks, I'm not going to detonate my motor over 7 bucks in gas,I run 94 in my 6.2.

It runs like a raped ape, I had a tranny relearn because it wasn't behaving, now it squawks through the 1st three gears if I'm on it, she's getting to 99 mph in under 7-9 seconds

If won't detonate. It's fine to run 87, the recommendation for 91 is to reach the hp ratings. I work at a Gm dealership, 80 % of people run 87 octane when we did our polls.

I run 94 octane in mine but only because it's tuned for it. If I had to run 87, there's no issue at all.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure if this should be a new topic, let me know if it's out of place. This my first post. Thanks 85077522 - AC Delco GM Genuine Parts Brake Master Cylinders. Anyone else had to replace this brake master cylinder yet. I didn't do any brake work, it looks like new parts and I've had the truck for about 4k miles, 119k total miles.  When it started to throw codes I did the calibrations with a bidirectional scanner and got the codes to clear but they came back so I did the routine; base bleed, automated bleed and final base bleed. All that with Bosch ES16-32N fluid (please look it up). That seemed to fix it but 100ish miles later it failed again so I ran the same process but with a pressure bleeder this time and got the same results, fixed for 100ish miles. The original fluid looked bad and I thought I got most of it out, it could've been the wrong fluid. The codes; P25A2, C05B0-00, C2A1B. I can get them to clear but not for long. The C05B0 indicates a leak in the front circuit (which is bone dry) so I'm thinking of doing the bleed process on that front again today and I don't know if that's taboo to just do the front but at this point it seems like it's worth the try anyway. The new master cylinder/module unit is supposed to get here today. But now I'm pretty much convinced this install is over my head. I've called several shops and some mobile guys that I know but this thing is like radio active material, scary wise. I did get 2 local shops say they should be able to do it, one says he has the SPS2 programing capability. And with the battery disconnected is there supposed to be pedal resistance, mine is to the floor, then if I pump it I can get some resistance. I had a panic stop prior to this issue which may have contributed from what I read. And on the first attempt to bleed and hydraulic test the scanner listed things to look for and one was any gaps between the pad and rotors which I did notice on the RF corner and I removed the outer pad (where the gap was) cleaned it and the hardware and didn't see a gap after that but will re-check it. I read that if pushing the caliper pistons back then you're supposed to open the bleeder so as to not push fluid backwards into the abs module or it will damage it. If that's true then that's also a possibility from the previous owner having the brakes changed before I got it. I'm using an XTool ip500 scanner. Any suggestions, questions and comments welcome. 
    • Next Friday will be my 6 week point from my right knee replacement.  The surgeon says it will be fine if I choose to drive after this checkup.  I know I could drive now but best to do as my surgeon (and my wife) tell me.  Richard compared being 62 to 72.  I remember when I was in my early 60's I was experiencing slow but regular decline in my mobility.  Thanks to good medical support,  i continued to fight the speed and spread of this decline. During my 60's I worked on non-surgical methods and just when I turned 70, my orthopedic surgeon recommended joint replacements.  In a little over a year, I had one shoulder and both knees replaced.  This hasn't been a terribly fun experience, but worth the discomfort as my future mobility health trajectory has reversed.  It is a treat to now be watching my mobility. balance and confidence steadily improve!
    • Grommets with the right cement should be perfectly fine. 
    • This is going to take allot of Assembly    
    • Why do they have the gas 10l80 opening at 145?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...