Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I read the manual and it stated Top Tier gas brands were recommended but no specific octane. Just bought a 2016 LT Suburban with the Luxury package. Previously used just the cheapest regularly (87 octane) gas on my 2008 LTZ.

Posted

well if its the luxury package, you should probably use premium gas...

 

j/k. I would still use regular unleaded just like every other engine that is not a tuned high performance machine.

 

I'm sure we'll hear from others who swear they get better performance from the premium fuel, so buy whatever you want.

Posted (edited)
post-127028-0-28094300-1476485477_thumb.jpg

Do NOT be buying up all the Premium fuel I need that stuff!. I like 93 octane from any supplier off the top tier fuel list for my tuned 6.2. Runs like a friggin Banshee and gets awesome gas mileage.......

I ran a lot of E85 through my 14 5.3 and never even considered top tier as being important just bought the cheapest stuff available whether E85 or regular 87 octane. The 5.3 really liked anything that I fed it, but the fuel mileage does suffer a bit on the E85.. I guess that is a BIg advantage in staying with the 5.3 engine if you are on a tight budget..

Edited by MyFavTruck
Posted

I read the manual and it stated Top Tier gas brands were recommended but no specific octane. Just bought a 2016 LT Suburban with the Luxury package. Previously used just the cheapest regularly (87 octane) gas on my 2008 LTZ.

From the Chevrolet manual, page 9-70; "Use regular unleaded gasoline meeting ASTM specification D4814 with a posted octane rating of 87 or higher. Do not use gasoline with an octane rating below 87, as it may cause engine damage and will lower fuel economy". I use 89, but as long as you don't use below 87, no where in the manual does it say the truck will perform better with anything higher.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I read the manual and it stated Top Tier gas brands were recommended but no specific octane. Just bought a 2016 LT Suburban with the Luxury package. Previously used just the cheapest regularly (87 octane) gas on my 2008 LTZ.

'Top Tier' is a certification of gasoline and additives, not of octane level.

National brands and larger regional brands will all have the certification. Discount independents may or may not.

 

http://www.toptiergas.com/

 

Some don't wish to pay for certification and may have the full package without it.

 

It's unlikely that a single tank of top tier, or a single tank that isn't would be noticeable to most.

Edited by redwngr
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

It's very important to use the recommended minimum octane in the engine, even today's modern engines with knock sensors. The 5.3L only needs 87 octane but the 6.2L needs 91 octane minimum.

 

As for using a fuel with a higher octane rating that required, well that's a complicated discussion. Some people believe higher octane fuels burn "slower" and hence will actually reduce performance in a engine that doesn't require higher octane fuel. That's true and not true. For retail pumps fuels, not really true. It is true for racing fuels, though. Racing fuels are not a good idea in your grocery getter!!

 

Some folks believe there is a difference in heat content (BTUs) between the different grades of octane fuels. And hence, a difference in the power gained in the engine. There is some truth to this, as it turns out. But, the difference is very small. More importantly, it's not always directionally consistent. In other words, with some brands, their high octane has slightly more heat content than their low octane; some brands it's the other way around. And, even within a brand, it will vary seasonally as well as regionally depending which specific refinery he fuel s coming from. So unless you want to carry around a BTU tester, it's virtually impossible to take advantage of the difference.

 

The octane rating itself will not produce more power in and engine that doesn't need it.

 

Yet some people are convinced their vehicle runs better on high octant (premium) fuel. BS? May not be. Some brands use more additives in their high octane fuels than the lower octane. Things like detergents to keep the injectors clean, anticorrosion additives, stabilizer to keep the fuel from degrading and vaporizing in the tank, etc. And some vehicles are more sensitive to the fuel and buildup on the injectors. So, by buying the higher octane fuel, you end up getting a higher quality fuel which can be helpful. Which is the point of the top tier fuels. These are higher quality fuels. And that DOES make a difference. At least for some vehicles. No way to know which ones, so buyer beware. But I would rather error on the safe side and only put high quality fuel in my vehicles. Unless your driving a huge number of miles a year, what's it really cost extra? JMHO.

  • Like 1
Posted

I've been using mostly top tier 87 in my 2016 Suburban but the one thing that has bothered me is the idle being rough. It's not concerning but I am just accustom to perfectly smooth idling vehicles and this is not one of them. I filled with a tank of ethanol free 87 and immediately noticed a smoother idle. I was considering trying a tank of premium ethanol free to see if that makes any difference.

Posted

 

Do NOT be buying up all the Premium fuel I need that stuff!. I like 93 octane from any supplier off the top tier fuel list for my tuned 6.2. Runs like a friggin Banshee and gets awesome gas mileage.......

I ran a lot of E85 through my 14 5.3 and never even considered top tier as being important just bought the cheapest stuff available whether E85 or regular 87 octane. The 5.3 really liked anything that I fed it, but the fuel mileage does suffer a bit on the E85.. I guess that is a BIg advantage in staying with the 5.3 engine if you are on a tight budget..

 

 

 

Which tune are you using?

Posted (edited)

If you have the 5.3 just use 87 Octane if you go to a top tier gas station.

If you have to fill up at some cheap-o no name brand discount gas station, you may want to throw in 89 Octane just to offset the craptacular discount gas. :)

Edited by Driver72
Posted

While the 5.3l does state 87 is to be used, most of the data logging on the 5.3l has shown they really should be running 89 or even 91. My 6.2l sees nothing other than 91 or a mix of 100 and 91 to get me to 93/94 octane since Oklahoma doesn't have 93 octane anymore.

Posted (edited)

 

 

Which tune are you using?

Hypertech max energy 2.0 part 2000. Really only bought it because it allows you to set a speed at which the AFM only comes on above. I have the GM Borla catback exh and the AFM at low speed irritates me. The Hypertech has 2 options for tune Premium fuel tune and a Regular fuel tune. I ran the premium fuel tune for about 5000 miles with only 93 octane. Got bored so just changed to regular fuel tune and put in a tank of top tier 87 octane as a test. I am getting an occasional click when in 4V at very light throttle around 58 to 62 mph. Next tank will be top tier 89 octane to see if the occasional click goes away. Looks like the verdict is DO NOT USE 87 OCTANE with a 6.2 no matter what tune you use! Truck has around 11,000 miles on it so figured it was broke in enough to experiment on a bit.

mostly city driving with loooong remote start warmups, the Denali DIC calculates overall average speed so that is why the 39mph average. that always seems to throw people off....
Edited by MyFavTruck
  • Like 1
Posted

Hypertech max energy 2.0 part 2000. Really only bought it because it allows you to set a speed at which the AFM only comes on above. I have the GM Borla catback exh and the AFM at low speed irritates me. The Hypertech has 2 options for tune Premium fuel tune and a Regular fuel tune. I ran the premium fuel tune for about 5000 miles with only 93 octane. Got bored so just changed to regular fuel tune and put in a tank of top tier 87 octane as a test. I am getting an occasional click when in 4V at very light throttle around 58 to 62 mph. Next tank will be top tier 89 octane to see if the occasional click goes away. Looks like the verdict is DO NOT USE 87 OCTANE with a 6.2 no matter what tune you use! Truck has around 11,000 miles on it so figured it was broke in enough to experiment on a bit.

 

 

mostly city driving with loooong remote start warmups, the Denali DIC calculates overall average speed so that is why the 39mph average. that always seems to throw people off....

Well, GM does recommend minimum. 91 octane for the 6.2L so no surprise your testing confirmed that. When you say "clicked" are you talking about audible knock, or detonation being picked up on the engine management system. Does the Hypertech let you monitors PIDs like knock?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • probably won't get a response from that user, as they haven't returned to the site since making that one post.  users don't (at least I don't, and I haven't seen any setting which would notify me via say, email) get any notification other than going to this site, and checking if they got a response on their thread...
    • Thanks - I wasn't quite caffeinated this morning. 2:1 makes sense, turning the crankshaft 360 degrees will turn the cam 180 degrees, and had I done that, the cam's dot would be at 6 and the crank's at 12 again.   I went ahead and took the sprocket off anyway, aligned everything dot-to-dot including the balance shaft just for s&g. I'm glad I did because I discovered no Loctite on the timing sprocket bolts. Maybe it's not required, but at only 20 ft-lb torque spec, those bolts aren't in there very tight. Cleaned and reassembled with some thread locker and torqued.   A general observation: Less is more with RTV. If a little doesn't stop a leak, a LOT probably won't, either. RTV is thinly veiled revenge, in a tube...      
    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...