Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looks like another change of the EVAP. Did the part you replaced be an AC Delco part?

 

At least you don't have to pull the bed like I did to get to it.

 

As for the fuel pump, it will cause hard starting. Best way to find out is do check fuel pressure. I got a loaner gauge from Auto Zone to check mine.

Posted

BOught a Dorman part both times (replaced 6 months ago).

 

Dorman 911-032 Vapor Canister Purge Valve

 

I went and filled up and it started fine. Code hasnt come back (yet). Hopefully this thread will help others. The fix is like $20 and maybe 5 mins of work.

Posted

Your original problem was no start after refueling, my response is the same. Your purge valve is stuck open, weather you've changed it or not before.

Posted

BOught a Dorman part both times (replaced 6 months ago).

 

Dorman 911-032 Vapor Canister Purge Valve

 

I went and filled up and it started fine. Code hasnt come back (yet). Hopefully this thread will help others. The fix is like $20 and maybe 5 mins of work.

 

Just an opinion, but........

 

When it comes engine metering, I would stick with stock components that were labeled Delco, Delphi, or GM - only.

 

Some of us had to learn the hard way.

Posted

I have had good luck with Dorman parts in the past, we will see how this one goes

 

Truck ran flawless today and it hasnt the past few wks.

Posted

Another fill up and a week of cold (freezing temps). No issues truck is firing right up again

  • Like 1
  • 4 years later...
Posted

I replaced all the spark plugs rapidfire Delco every part on my truck is completely brand new not saying that something did not break or go bad I know parts go bad I’m having trouble hard start turns over over but don’t start then when it does start sounds like it has a cam in it changed all the injectors brand new check for vacuum leak with brake cleaner replaced all O2 sensors by the way I’m having a low-voltage high-voltage or bank to downstream replace the plug off the main harness didn’t change it I know I have a short somewhere my problem is the truck is not wanting to start when it starts it is completely smells like it is flooded at first I thought the fuel pump it’s brand new change pressure regulator brand new same time when I did the injectors and the plugs But she is running horrible when she does start multiple misfires and then it goes away sometimes and here’s the FYI sometimes I get her to fire right up first time Confused don’t know where to go I have $23,000 in my 2001 Tahoe everything down to the brake lines every charcoal canister every electrical component fuel everything my battery has been acting kind of funny lately I’m going to try changing the fuel pump relay to see if that works any help would be absolutely amazing guys took out the fuel pressure regulator in about a gallon of fuel shout out so has good pressure And change the fuel filter lost I even replace the valve cover with the new system on the driver side I love my Chevy wouldn’t drive anything else please help if you can

Posted (edited)

I had those symptoms once. I got a load of water in the gas from an unfamiliar station. I had to have the tank pumped out.

Edited by Beamie
Posted

Pump the tank out I had some water in the fuel I hit a water puddle about a year ago but I don’t think it’s from that I thought it was for maybe a gas station kind of the same as you I did replace the purge valve solenoid yesterday and it fired right up I’m still getting a lien code or bank to downstream O2 sensor but I just replaced it may be bad part I may be a short in the wire for the roof I bought some fuel out of the where the fuel filter is into a glass jar 

found so water in fuel I ordered the oil catch can

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This video may not be the exact content for the joke thread but its a lot of laughs so here it is, I've only watched a portion of it so far but if anyone is looking for some light hearted good soap box driving action, its here. As a note in the upper left of the screen it shows the number out of 100 to refer back to any particular vehicle for comment !.    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1351928276956715
    • Did have to make 1 modification because of the WeatherTech rear mud flaps and that was needing 3 longer screws than what came with the install package. 😄
    • Picked up the liners yesterday. Installed passenger side WITHOUT any modifications. All mounting holes lined up perfectly. Rain is interfering today with drivers side. Very Happy! Will add pics when finished
    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...