Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wish I could put one of these hoods on without the functioning intake. The hoods look like something a middle schooler designed on the bottom side. I like the look of the outside but could not care less about the functionality.

The underside is a tad put together honestly seen pics with out the insulator just the duct work , I'll see when I get all this stuff . But I totally agree they could of came up with a better underneath . Why not just make the hood have the duct work built in like any other ram air hood not all this added plastic and whatever else

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

So here it is complete 2017 duramax , on my 2016 6.0 ... came together fairly easy wondering if it needs anything else????

 

 

 

 

 

 

dbc71ef87bc93d153c14637daa796f3c.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

4fa56c2c915ddb259fe6de79392c05c6.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

So here it is complete 2017 duramax , on my 2016 6.0 ... came together fairly easy wondering if it needs anything else????

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

 

Did you retrofit the Duramax air box as well? I think I see the opening to it, but not 100% positive.

Posted

No I already had the k & n intake so it dumps on top of that so I can live with that lol

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Posted

No I already had the k & n intake so it dumps on top of that so I can live with that lol

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

 

 

Ah ok lol. I took a look at that underhood shot again and I can see the seal area around the K&N filter housing. More air the better!

Posted

We shall see want to see how good that water valve is it's raining today , also as a added pre caution bought a k & n outerwears for the filter incase any water does drop down on it from the intake

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Posted

How much was the hood?

The hood complete duct work n all with paint was 19 and change

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Posted

is the scoop black or chrome? Do you have part numbers?

 

 

I WANT ONE!!!!!!

Scott

post-165690-148954431145_thumb.pngpost-165690-148954431799_thumb.png

 

The ones that are crossed out on that sheet are for a gmc but that should be the hardware list

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

is the scoop black or chrome? Do you have part numbers?

 

 

I WANT ONE!!!!!!

Scott

My scoop is black had to plasti dip it to get it flat to match the grille

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

post-165690-148954431145_thumb.png

post-165690-148954431799_thumb.png

post-165690-148954431145_thumb.png

post-165690-148954431799_thumb.png

post-165690-148954431145_thumb.png

post-165690-148954431799_thumb.png

  • Like 1
Posted

Did you have the hood painted locally or could you order a painted "line pull " from the factory?

Local body shop I use for alot of stuff painted it , comes black primered from gm

 

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...