Jump to content

What tint are you guys running with? Pics?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Here's the inside pics 9cadd3e15b7faa906848f16e0d45f5e2.jpg60528569a5b39ea91b6a88b7b6569503.jpg6feb72ec39599f23d1554dd0e7339386.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did you paint your tow hooks?

 

I'm also from the 301

Posted

Here's the inside pics 9cadd3e15b7faa906848f16e0d45f5e2.jpg60528569a5b39ea91b6a88b7b6569503.jpg6feb72ec39599f23d1554dd0e7339386.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

wow! gorgeous rig!!! :drool::drool::drool:

Posted

Did you paint your tow hooks?

 

I'm also from the 301

They are the red ones that come on the new "redline" edition silverados

wow! gorgeous rig!!! :drool::drool::drool:

Thanks!

Posted

30% here, slightly lighter then the rear, but still some privacy, and with a no tint law, we don't get hassled by the cops...22808d18c685696f2e49402d90946b3a.jpg

 

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Posted

I run hybrid ceramic tint which actually blocks IR as well as UV so it does better at controlling temperature. 18% on front doors 5% on rear doors and back and then 55% on the windshield with a 5% sunstrip. Keeps interior nice and cool and don't need to wear sunglasses when driving.

post-174281-0-93981700-1498539058.jpg

post-174281-0-62741100-1498539067.jpg

post-174281-0-93981700-1498539058.jpg

post-174281-0-62741100-1498539067.jpg

post-174281-0-93981700-1498539058.jpg

post-174281-0-62741100-1498539067.jpg

post-174281-0-93981700-1498539058.jpg

post-174281-0-62741100-1498539067.jpg

Posted

 

how is seeing out of the windshield at night? i want to get mine done but not sure what % to get

The windshield isn't bad, occasionally backing up I roll down the windows to see better out off the side mirrors when I need to get into my garage. I will be doing the same on any of my future vehicles. Love the way it looks
Posted

I run hybrid ceramic tint which actually blocks IR as well as UV so it does better at controlling temperature. 18% on front doors 5% on rear doors and back and then 55% on the windshield with a 5% sunstrip. Keeps interior nice and cool and don't need to wear sunglasses when driving.

Where did you find said tint

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

Posted

Where did you find said tint

 

Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk

My buddy owns a wrap and tint shop. It's made by Suntek. They make standard tint, a hybrid-ceramic and a full ceramic. The full ceramic is really expensive. The hybrid is a nice in-between. For a full install all the way around including windshield expect to be around the 500 range which is about 50% more than standard. But my wifes Camry has the same level of standard tint all the way around and my truck was about 10 degrees cooler on a 90 plus degree day last week when I checked with an IR temperature gun. So I'd definitely say it's worth the investment.

Posted

I just did 20% over existing rear tints, 50% over existing front doors and 20% over existing eyebrow. Will post pics later.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I did 5% on the rear window and doors and 20% on the front doors. d64ffc70da53fe0b8105a26d9b66cfc5.jpg

 

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Posted

I have 35% on the front doors, a 5% strip across the windsheild and the rear is all stock.

20170430 090403

Posted

3M high performance. Stock windows in the back were covered with double layer 5%, front 2 windows is a 5% layered with a 20% and the windshield is 20% with a 5% top strip. Nice and dark no you cannot see in at all!!!!

Posted

0f78eea605f57176e8db3088a8837399.jpg

 

5% on doors and back window and 35% on front window

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

One word... Illegal. lol

 

But 20% all around with 60 covering the front windshield with a 5% strip

Hope your still joyful when your insurance claim is denied. In the case of an injury accident you'll be cutting an awful lot of really big checks...

I'm completely stock and of course "legal" as well.

lmao

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,030 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...