Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was not aware of this. I've never encountered one that wasn't resistance based directly from the wheel and then usually converted to data at BCM. But I retired a few years ago so I haven't done one of our body style trucks.

It has been somewhat frustrating having to deal with this. When it's data it is very hard to troubleshoot. I basically have to call tech support and I have to verify connections. Once that is done it is basically "oh well guess there is a variation on that one we haven't seen, sorry."

 

With resistance based I could always go to the clock spring and use a meter to find my wire or wires. Then use manual programming to get it working if the aswc or pac instructions weren't accurate.

 

I think that the data based controls are why when you go from volume to track you have to wait a little bit before the oem radio will respond to the new input. Same thing happens when you change the radio. There is still the required pause between going from volume to track. I haven't seen this on anything other than the new GMs. I have had some customers say that the OEM unit didn't do that after we have installed an aftermarket but we have 2 newer GMs in the parking lot of the shop and can show that the OEM responds the same.

 

I am going on 16 years of professional installation and each year things get tougher and we are losing more and more analog controls. Almost everything has gone data to data so when things dont work it is frustrating and you become a part swapper since trouble shooting is limited to checking power, ground, and continuity on data connections.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Thanks for all the info guys but I gotta admit I am a little confused now! chancyrudd, since the aswc-1 catches the signal before the BCM (my BCM is not SWC compatible however I am changing to an aftermarket headunit) does this mean it will still work whether the controls are resistance or data based as long as I have the correct clockspring?

 

I would assume if the proper power is at the clock spring connector for the steering wheel control module then you would get your data output. When we first started doing these trucks back in 14 we were having to disconnect the green/blk wire at the clock spring connector and connect to the steering side of the wife and leave the other side disconnected. Now we just solder on and leave the wire connected to the bcm. If I remember right on those first few trucks that we were told to wire that way they lost the button illumination. Now the we just solder on and leave it connected to BCM the button illumination(which I assume is through data) still works.

 

I said all that to say that I would think that your outputs would still work from the module but the buttons may not illuminate if that is done via data on same wire from BCM.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Posted

I would assume if the proper power is at the clock spring connector for the steering wheel control module then you would get your data output. When we first started doing these trucks back in 14 we were having to disconnect the green/blk wire at the clock spring connector and connect to the steering side of the wife and leave the other side disconnected. Now we just solder on and leave the wire connected to the bcm. If I remember right on those first few trucks that we were told to wire that way they lost the button illumination. Now the we just solder on and leave it connected to BCM the button illumination(which I assume is through data) still works.

 

I said all that to say that I would think that your outputs would still work from the module but the buttons may not illuminate if that is done via data on same wire from BCM.

 

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Thanks once again! If I understand correctly the buttons still worked when you used to disconnect the wire at the BCM (you just lost illumination which I don't mind) so that would lead me to believe I don't need to have the BCM that supports SWC and just need to make sure there is power/ground to the steering wheel module in order for it to send data(?) My guess is there is already power/ground at the steering wheel for the cruise control buttons and it would make sense for them to be tied together instead of having separate wires however as I am finding it may not necessarily be that simple!

 

Is anybody out there with steering wheel audio controls and cruise control willing to remove the fuse and let me know if both stop working? :)

  • 4 years later...
Posted
On 9/1/2017 at 11:02 PM, Marv88 said:

Thanks once again! If I understand correctly the buttons still worked when you used to disconnect the wire at the BCM (you just lost illumination which I don't mind) so that would lead me to believe I don't need to have the BCM that supports SWC and just need to make sure there is power/ground to the steering wheel module in order for it to send data(?) My guess is there is already power/ground at the steering wheel for the cruise control buttons and it would make sense for them to be tied together instead of having separate wires however as I am finding it may not necessarily be that simple!

 

Is anybody out there with steering wheel audio controls and cruise control willing to remove the fuse and let me know if both stop working? :)

Did you ever figure out how to add the steering wheel controls?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I think the answer is it's a stock 5.7 Hemi with a 3.0L blower bolted onto it 😉   Practically, because a blower introduces a lot of high pressure, severe thermal stress, and extreme mechanical loads on an engine. Things still need a little time to seat and get used to moving under load.   Sarcastically, because it's a Stellantis/ 5.7 Hemi and those things need all the help they can get!!
    • It's been a little over three weeks since my second knee replacement.  I can now walk around the house without a walker or cane but still have a lot of healing ahead.  This morning I was able to bring a cup of coffee to my wife in bed.  A few days ago, this coffee would have ended up on the kitchen floor!  Knee replacement surgery is very common and will typically enhance the recipient's future quality of life. However, the recovery process can present significant challenges, pain and discomfort. I encourage anyone facing a recommended total knee replacement to welcome the opportunity.  Just be aware that your body may take several months to fully welcome the new parts! 
    • The Germans basically didn't make the list. There aren't a lot of shade-tree mechanics who work on them in general. At some point the economic equation of keeping a car alive favors junking it. Anecdote/experience tells me this is the case versus actual bad engines/engineering. Not that there isn't any, but there are definitely notable excellent examples. The 2.0 diesels will go forever and ever if one keeps the car around it running. The 2.0 gas cars eventually wear out their turbos but the block below it is usually still solid as a rock. BMW inline 6's same thing. Mercedes diesels of yesteryear, not uncommon to see 250k out of those engines, easy.     Link to the synopsis of the study: https://www.iseecars.com/longest-lasting-cars-study
    • 0w20 is recommended in the Sequoia. 0w16 in the Highlander Hybrid.   I think you make a compelling case for both the quality and frequency of maintenance but I wouldn't go so far as to plot a linear relationship between longevity and oil weight 😉   The list is interesting and leaves me with some questions. The Silverado 1500 is 12.9% likely while the GMC Sierra 1500 is only 10.8% likely. Arguably, they're the same truck, so other factors must be influencing the outcome.   The Honda Odyssey ranks #12 at 13% likely. Great. Rest assured we'll never stop hearing about the dang thing LOL.   There's a bit of a spread between the 4Runner (32.9%) and Tacoma (25.3%). Both overlap on the same 4.0 for many years although the Tacoma used a 3.5 for the last 10-12ish. I wonder if that's related to use-case or if it's suggesting the 3.5 isn't quite as up to the task, or maybe something else fails mechanically.   Ram at 3.5% overall likely, but the Ram 3500 holds the top spot on the Heavy Duty Models at 39.7%. One might say the Cummins is a ringer and provides an unfair advantage. I don't think it's fair/accurate to pit the GM Fullsize 1500's in a list with HD's which are basically medium-duty wearing a 3500 badge.   The Tahoe and Suburban hold spots #15 and #8, respectively, on the longest lasting SUV's list. What's the difference? One's got a shorter butt, unless they're also counting the 2500/3500 Suburbans in those numbers.   The GMC Canyon gets a 1.4% increase over its twin brother Colorado. Why, because it's prettier?   SO many questions...
    • Have the aftermarket system removed an re-test.  Its pretty much the only way to know if there is still an issue that is the truck and not from that.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...