Jump to content

IPhone 8 & wireless charging pad


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/30/2017 at 8:41 PM, rtreptow7 said:

needgmparts.com

Got my pins and connector Monday and ordered the module today. Hope this baby works as everyone has reported. I kept googling GM part online and the price kept getting cheaper. Finally settled on $95 for the module with $8 shipping. 

  • Replies 178
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

firstchoiceGMparts.com. they are out of Maine and I am in NY so shipping was not bad. next best shipping rate was $10 from a PA dealership. However they are out of stock but I am in no hurry.

Posted
10 minutes ago, GMC4Zee said:

firstchoiceGMparts.com. they are out of Maine and I am in NY so shipping was not bad. next best shipping rate was $10 from a PA dealership. However they are out of stock but I am in no hurry.

Everyone is out of stock.  I’m told it shouldn’t be too long though.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
Got my pins and connector Monday and ordered the module today. Hope this baby works as everyone has reported. I kept googling GM part online and the price kept getting cheaper. Finally settled on $95 for the module with $8 shipping. 

What pins and connector did you order and from where? Was it a 2018 pin and connector?
Posted

I order the parts shown in gamboa's post on page 9 with the pictures. They are for the 2018 module. The part numbers are on the bags and I used Mouser Electronics just like he did. I have everything in my possession , now waiting for the deep freeze to end so I can work on it without freezing my fingers off. You definitely need the connector and some have had success reusing the same pins but I ordered new ones. Unfortunately they can only be had in lots of 100 so i have many extras...

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Do you have the 2018 parts they should fit without issue. Some splicing is needed that’s it. I also ordered the wiring bundle from Gambia’s post on page 9. He’s helpful and quick to respond.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Alex White said:

Do you have the 2018 parts they should fit without issue. Some splicing is needed that’s it. I also ordered the wiring bundle from Gambia’s post on page 9. He’s helpful and quick to respond.

No splicing is necessary. We used a pin removal tool and then just inserted them into the new plug.  Same orientation.

 

Posted

What is a pin removal tool,  I broke a connector trying to remove it from old plug.  As soon as my new connectors arrive tomorrow, I will try again.  Also, the red part on the new plug slides back and forth, does it need to be in a certain position?

Posted
1 hour ago, Mike ODwyer said:

What is a pin removal tool,  I broke a connector trying to remove it from old plug.  As soon as my new connectors arrive tomorrow, I will try again.  Also, the red part on the new plug slides back and forth, does it need to be in a certain position?

They come in a set of assorted sizes and allow the pins to be removed without damage by compressing the locking barb. The sliding part acts as a lock.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • LOL west coast they need to see what the midwest actually has.  We have been holding at 2.99 for a few weeks now.  Even by work they have come down to 3.02 for the past week.
    • Diesel or gas?  The 37s will obviously, drastically reduce mpg, but the gasser will take a bigger hit to mpg, and power.  Rough guess, but I'd estimate at least a  2mpg hit on the diesel, and up to 4on the gasser. Maybe more.    I wouldn't sweat a gear change on a duramax at all, and unlikely on the gasser either. You're obviously not concerned with acceleration or towing, and the 10spd will find itself in the right gear without much hunting, if any.    If towing, mpg and acceleration are a concern, you're doing the wrong mods.  Either leave it alone, or do the lift/tires and let the chips fall where they may. 
    • I understand. It is disturbing to think a manufacture asks so much and gives so little in engineering support. This is not a GM issues, this is a greed issue and one the ALL practice.    My intent was not to remove the wind from anyone's sail but rather to point out the areas deficient so that they can be discussed with improvements the goal. But to do that you have to know the truth and what that truth is.    The commercial interest are honed in on a few select issues in which they control all the variables and are not forthcoming in the least with their customers about the details. Failure is the only thing that drives these people to improvement. One way not to fail it to manage public "expectations". The set a bar they can clear and put their thumbs under the suspenders with chest puffed.... Only the internal data tells the story fully. As we don't have access to that for decades then we have to generate it ourselves. UOA's with data that matters.  
    • I had skimmed through that article when you posted the link and honestly I felt rather defeated in a sense and realized that all these years in changing oil that in fact putting in what I was told was a good quality oil was probably not filtered as well as it should be although the filter put on the engine would be what ( as long as it never went into bypass mode ) would be the final filtering of the new oil that the engine components would first see, but then the filtering media itself is not up to par to what is ideal because a full flow filter would be too restrictive to filter fine enough for the engines best outcome in the long run. Only one of our tractors over the years which was a Versatile with a 855 Cummins had a separate bypass filter, some engine manufacturers did spec a partial bypass system within the main oil filter but I don't believe any other trucks or equipment I was servicing used such a filter. No doubt a product like the Amsoil bypass system is of benefit as long as nothing goes sideways with the extra plumbing and filter such as a rupture/leak that could cause the oil to pump out of the engine ( yes that Versatile had a remote canister with hoses routed to it as well ). With the idiot egr system on a diesel and as a result forcing a lot more soot into the oil, that certainly isn't helping the diesel engines cause or as you pointed out the GDI engine issue with creating more soot and aside from having a fancy secondary filtering system, changing the oil more often helping lower the total soot load.     So oil manufacturing and the end product is not something one can control and I wonder if there are specs on what various oil packaging companies produce in particle count or size. As to the filtering, if the OEM is not designing a filter size and spec that is really what it could be, they too are short changing the end user and so what is the answer. Of course as you say the oil side can only do so much if the air side isn't keeping up its end of the picture and air filters are only so efficient and if in a dusty environment such as farm or construction or driving gravel roads there is a lot of dirt to filter out and some of that ends up into the air stream.    Of course the irony in places like where I am where they dump the salt on the highways but also will mix in some calcium or outright pure calcium for problem road area's, or using calcium as dust control on gravel roads, the vehicle that gets used in that environment may rust out before a properly engineered engine and maintenance finally wears out so one has to face that reality in the rust belt. 
    • Has anyone run these on their 2500?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...