Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is a crazy thread no doubt. Can anyone confirm that this does not occur on the full solid window? I don't have the slide open rear window.

Posted

Yes it seems to be a problem with the connector on the sliding window. With all the opening and closing it gets worn and dirty and bent and creates a hot spot. The full solid windows have been fine as far as I know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, slide187 said:

Yes it seems to be a problem with the connector on the sliding window. With all the opening and closing it gets worn and dirty and bent and creates a hot spot. The full solid windows have been fine as far as I know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks for the quick reply!

I Hope GM steps up and gets this resolved for all the owners that have the sliding window.

I can only imagine how that must feel when one hears that pop and sees that window shattered.

Edited by poconojoe
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Not happy to report this but my full solid window shattered on me today after hearing the dreaded pop sound. 

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Qmart49 said:

Not happy to report this but my full solid window shattered on me today after hearing the dreaded pop sound. 

Oh, crap. Sorry to hear that. I have the full solid window also. I'm going to refrain from using the defrost. I turned off the auto defrost in the settings menu. Infotainment/settings/vehicle/climate and air quality/auto rear defog. I'm only going to use it when absolutely necessary. Then wait for a recall...

Edited by poconojoe
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Anyone have a PDF copy of the recall document# N192265660

Posted
On 2/21/2018 at 10:18 PM, Paul Wojcicki said:

Good evening! Sadly this is my first post on this forum but I have lurked a bit. I own a 2017 Sierra Denali which I bought in May of 2017. I was driving today and after using my remote start to start the truck (like i do often) I drove 5 minutes and then smelled smoke. I turned around and saw smoke pouring out from behind the rear seat on the driver side. I began to freak out and pulled over to get out but about 10 seconds after I saw the smoke and began to pull over I heard a loud bang like a gunshot. I turned around and my rear driver window shattered into thousands of pieces. It stayed in place but shot a decent amount of glass inside and outside of the vehicle. I am dropping the truck off at the dealership in the morning to have this diagnosed and this is clearly something that should not of happened. I only think what would of happened if I had kids or people in the back of the truck when this took place. Very disappointed right now and want this taken care of, but figured I needed to post this on here to inform all of you about this issue. I have researched this happening and it is a common thing on some Ford f150s but I havent seen to much about GMC.20180221_155246.thumb.jpg.879f22a74290ed4f0e03ff15da7b4ffd.jpg

I had this same exact thing just happen to my 2016 high country last night. Did dealer cover this or you get any answers about this issue

Posted
1 hour ago, Avolution03 said:

Anyone have a PDF copy of the recall document# N192265660

Did you find any answers on this of it’s a recall won’t let me view the comments 

Posted

I am still doing research. I had my rear defrost short out on my 2018 GMC Sierra HD last week. Luckily it did not shatter the window.

Dealership is telling me I'm not covered under the recall and they want $1400 out of pocket to replaced the rear window assembly.

Even my Ally Major Guard extended warranty denied the repair. Crazy.

Looking into other options. 44k on the truck.

I've reached out to GMC customer service. Waiting to hear back.

Also, does anyone know the fuse/relay location for the rear defrost. I want to pull that before things get worse.
060ef7e4e05c099f6996b0f2de4ca19c.jpg9b6c292d470131fcf862b52d3f372edd.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
4 hours ago, Avolution03 said:

I am still doing research. I had my rear defrost short out on my 2018 GMC Sierra HD last week. Luckily it did not shatter the window.

Dealership is telling me I'm not covered under the recall and they want $1400 out of pocket to replaced the rear window assembly.

Even my Ally Major Guard extended warranty denied the repair. Crazy.

Looking into other options. 44k on the truck.

I've reached out to GMC customer service. Waiting to hear back.

Also, does anyone know the fuse/relay location for the rear defrost. I want to pull that before things get worse.
060ef7e4e05c099f6996b0f2de4ca19c.jpg9b6c292d470131fcf862b52d3f372edd.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

Fuse box under the hood, try fuse #10.

Posted

Thanks Jim,

I'll give that a look in the morning.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
1 minute ago, Avolution03 said:

Thanks Jim,

I'll give that a look in the morning.

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

You are very welcome.

 

Do not give up with GM, make sure you have opened a claim, and get the number, you will need it.

 

Really stress the point that you purchased an after market warranty from a GM dealership, and they are denying this too. Let them know you are upset, and want this to be taken care of, see how that goes.

 

If you start to lose traction, on this approach, start down the road of them helping you with the cost, this is when you will need help from the dealerships service manager, hope you have a good relationship with the dealer. They can do a lot more in helping you that they will let on.

  • Like 1
Posted

It amazes me with how widely known and documented this problem is that any dealer would even try to say that you’re not covered. It went from the official recall fix being to just remove fuse #10 to actually replacing components on the window surface at the junction point where it closes. And yet some of them are still giving us a hard time about it.

 

I was going to try putting in a timed relay after I removed fuse 10 and then I just went thru the whole winter not once saying “jeez, I wish my rear window defogger worked”. So I’m just leaving it off. And tbh I don’t even know if I’d have any confidence in it not happening again even after the FULL fix.

 

The heated mirrors still work w/o the rear window so I don’t even think about it any more.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
It amazes me with how widely known and documented this problem is that any dealer would even try to say that you’re not covered. It went from the official recall fox being to just remove fuse #10 to actually replacing components on the window surface at the junction point where it closes. And yet some of them are still giving us a hard time about it.

I was going to try putting in a timed relay after I removed fuse 10 and then I just went thru the whole winter not once saying “jeez, I wish my rear window defogger worked”. So I’m just leaving it off. And tbh I don’t even know if I’d ya e confidence in it not happening again even after the FULL fix.

The heated mirrors still work w/o the rear window so I don’t even think about it any more.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I completely agree. It is mind-boggling why they don't include all VIN numbers in the recall.



Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 1 Anonymous, 636 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...