Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Accutune Fox 2.5 DSC Coilover specifications:
 
Shock travel: 5.4 inches
Spring Rate: 700 lbs
 
Initial impression:
Ride quality is much better than the Icons. I actually have the lift from the shocks that I should and my 34.25 inch tall Toyo open country AT2 275/65/R20 tires no longer rub. I have the the DSC set at the lowest setting and the valving in the shock seem to be spot on.
 
Fender well measurements:
Driver side: 40 3/8 inches
Passenger: 40 1/2 inches
1/8 of an inch difference I could of fully adjusted the Chevy lean out. I still have plenty of room for adjustment on both coils. I’m going to see where they settle at by the end of the week and adjust from there.
 
I’ve had the Dirt King Upper control arms on for a year now. They are still solid. I lube the uniball once a month with Triflow super lubricant, and spray the upper control arm bushings with lithium grease. The grease keeps the polyurethane bushings from squeaking.
 
Installation of the Fox 2.5 DSC Coilovers.
I removed the tires and loosened disconnected the sway bar end links. Then unbolted the upper control arm uniball from the knuckle/spindle. Next unbolted the two lower control arm coilover mount bolts. After that the upper coilover bolts. Removed the garbage icon coilovers.
 
- [ ] Now this part was a little interesting. The lower coilover mount adapters are offset to allow clearance for he cv shaft. The coilovers lower mount was not clocked correctly. So I bolted the coilovers in using the three upper mounting bolts. Then I grabbed my BFW a 16 inch crescent wrapped a cloth around the bottom Shock eyelet shaft and clicked them. Now here is the important information here the big nut on the lower mount adapter has to be facing the rear to offset the shock towards the front. This will allow the clearance needed for the cv shaft.
 
After correcting the lower mount alignment issue I installed the lower bolts with blue Loctite and torqued them to 50 ft/lbs. the upper bolts received blue Loctite and 36 ft/lbs of torque as did the sway bar end links and uniball nut and bolt.
 
I’ll update further when I’ve had more time with them so far a 100 miles and they’re great.
 
3ab81f4db93ced49301d3734fb3a58e9.jpg021c4707ef9e08dc72aa60652164d627.jpgb7e17b0ecbe7579212aab917de0c3068.jpg
Old Icon Junk
cb32ce79f8d829cd7f4e557b8ae3781d.jpg
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I've been considering the CST coilovers for my Zone 4.5, as they make a 4.5 version. These are reported to ride very nicely and are cheaper than the Fox ones. Nice to hear you are having food results from yours. Sad really because I thought Icon was supposed to be top shelf.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

Well the third day of driving on the Accutune Fox shocks and they are great. I no longer have jarring over the joints in the road or bridge expansion joints. I’m not slowing down for the normal dips on my route into work. Both sides have settled at 40 1/4 inches. The rear end is more predictable and behaved. I will continue to update as they break in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
I've been considering the CST coilovers for my Zone 4.5, as they make a 4.5 version. These are reported to ride very nicely and are cheaper than the Fox ones. Nice to hear you are having food results from yours. Sad really because I thought Icon was supposed to be top shelf.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Did you get the CST’s in and on yet?

 

So if you would like Fox, Sway-sways, or Kings all they have to do to accommodate your lift is put an extended shock eyelet shaft on. See the below picture. If I do decide to do a 4 inch lift. I’ll just order the correct length eyelet shaft and install it.

 

457d058b80b0a97cf8bea45d2701a07b.jpgf15269e86d666b22ed18a0d81b50b2cd.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Yep they are awesome. I am so pleased with these shocks. The ride is much better than the Icons. These are what I expected the icons to be. The little bumps in the road are sucked right up as well as the large bumps. Rail road tracks are not an issue neither are expansion joints in the bridges. I don’t have to slow down for all the whoops in my daily commute that I had to in the past.

I tried adjusting the DSC but found that I like the high speed adjustment at the lowest level like they were originally set. The low speed I went up one click.

The shocks have also been fiancé approved. She was honest and told me that she thought I was just crazy before and the truck just rode like a truck. The first time she rode in the truck afterwards she was surprised and she still complements how well it rides.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Update: now with the new rubber replacing the out of round and worn tires the truck is the best ride quality I ever had. 646976b15cc2f811841449b7ce9ed909.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Took the Fiancé, daughter, and sister on a road trip to New Braunsfell. The truck was riding so nice that they didn’t even notice how nice it was ridding. With the extra tire sidewall and the shocks I have found my best combo this portion of the build needs no more improvement the suspension is perfect. Now to play with rear shackles and Deaver springs.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Hey @Madcow2020, Truck looks good with the new tires. I am looking to do a similar lift setup (coilovers + new UCAs). What size tire are you running and still very satisfied with the setup?

Posted
Hey [mention=130996]Madcow2020[/mention], Truck looks good with the new tires. I am looking to do a similar lift setup (coilovers + new UCAs). What size tire are you running and still very satisfied with the setup?


285/75/R17 Cooper’s AT3


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Anyone have any idea, possibly through trial and error, whether I can fit a 285/60/20 on a 2017-2018 gmc 1500 with a 2.25” level. Currently have 275/60/20 with +18 offset wheels with no rubbing.

Posted
Did ya use the search function?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


What’s the search function??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Just ordered a set for the front. Still trying to find a good deal on the rear. Did you go with Fox DSC in the rear as well?

Posted
Just ordered a set for the front. Still trying to find a good deal on the rear. Did you go with Fox DSC in the rear as well?


I have the 2.0 adjustable valves in the rear. I use the adjustment on the the rear more than the fronts. When I put a skid steer or 25’ trailer with a load on. They help a lot when they’re cranked up about 4 or 5 notches. I’m planing on up grading to the 2.5 rears with DSC around February. I want to do shackles at the same time.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...