Jump to content

2019 Sierra 6.2 Crew Cab Denali WOT Runs

SkiDooNick700

Recommended Posts

SkiDooNick700 Enthusiast

SkiDooNick700

Posted
Posted

Hey guys, was surfing YouTube the other day and came across a 2019 6.2 Denali owner.  He keeps adding more and more vids which is great.

 

Link here is for his WOT vids in all the different driving modes.  Interesting how off road mode is the quickest by far.  Touring mode seemed like a dog, and I wasn't overly impressed with Sport either based on the video.

 

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Sierra Dan Senior Enthusiast

Sierra Dan

Posted
Posted

Back in the day, I was advised to take it easy until at least the first oil change at 1,000 - 1,200

Then again I have heard drive it like you are going to drive it!  LOL

f8l vnm Senior Enthusiast

f8l vnm

Posted
Posted

Break in ? Lol. Braking it in moment I drive off the lot. 

Live never ever broken an engine in and never had an engine go bad on me.  This ain’t an f1 engine. Lol. 

NWI Denali Enthusiast

NWI Denali

Posted
Posted

Honestly seems slower to me than the K2 trucks. I am getting 6.5 seconds to 60. K2's do high 5's. Maybe more aggressive and restrictive torque management on the 10 speed?

Snoringbear Enthusiast

Snoringbear

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, shift_grind said:

Truck looked like it was moving out to me.  4wd crew cab on 22s flew up to 106.  Even did a little 4wd burnout.  

106?  Musta bumped the speed limiter up some.  My 2015 Silverado LTZ 6.2L 4X4 CC will only do 98 mph when the speed limiter kicks in ?.....

SILVER SLED Senior Enthusiast

SILVER SLED

Posted
Posted

I like the more numerous than before driving modes.  A tuner can tune one of the modes for all out low/no torque management and super quick shifts, and still have a every day mode and a tow/haul mode.  

 

That's the main reason I got a tuner is to get rid of the top speed governor.  My truck zooms right past 110mph and will reach 130 fairly easy.  On a closed track of course.  ;)

Saskquatch Enthusiast

Saskquatch

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, SILVER SLED said:

My truck zooms right past 110mph and will reach 130 fairly easy.  On a closed track of course.  ;)

Darwin award in the making. 

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
Honestly seems slower to me than the K2 trucks. I am getting 6.5 seconds to 60. K2's do high 5's. Maybe more aggressive and restrictive torque management on the 10 speed?

Car and driver did a review on the Denali with the 10 speed auto. It was a tad slower to 60. They summarize transmission tuning and too many shifts to 60.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
shift_grind Enthusiast

shift_grind

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


Car and driver did a review on the Denali with the 10 speed auto. It was a tad slower to 60. They summarize transmission tuning and too many shifts to 60.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link?

 

I think he saw 1 magazine did 5.8 and he thinks every k2xx does 5.8 every time, no matter what.  This truck has 22s, no word on elevation, humidity, temp, it's not even fully broke in.  Traction off? 8 speed vs 10 isn't the difference and I'm not sure there are more shifts to 60. 

 

So far all the reviewer's said they accelerated better and gm says around .5 seconds faster to 60.  I have no reason to doubt it. 

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
Link?

 

I think he saw 1 magazine did 5.8 and he thinks every k2xx does 5.8 every time, no matter what.  This truck has 22s, no word on elevation, humidity, temp, it's not even fully broke in.  Traction off? 8 speed vs 10 isn't the difference and I'm not sure there are more shifts to 60. 

 

So far all the reviewer's said they accelerated better and gm says around .5 seconds faster to 60.  I have no reason to doubt it. 

I don’t do people’s work for them. Look up car and driver reviews it’s right there. A question was asked I answered. Two of the same vehicles could have different times, seen it many times.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

shift_grind Enthusiast

shift_grind

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I don’t do people’s work for them. Look up car and driver reviews in it’s right there. A question was asked I answered. Two of the same vehicles could have different times, seen it many times.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Don't make a statement you can't back up. I asked for a link because I know there isn't one of a 2019 Silverado or Sierra doing 0-60 by Car and Driver.  Yukon maybe, but seeing as that's not a all new lighter truck it's irrelevant.  

KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted
Don't make a statement you can't back up. I asked for a link because I know there isn't one of a 2019 Silverado or Sierra doing 0-60 by Car and Driver.  Yukon maybe, but seeing as that's not a all new lighter truck it's irrelevant.  

I have the app on my phone. Soo the same drive line combo in a different truck will provide different results? So what’s faster GMC or Chevy with identical drive lines? That’s the best I’ve read today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,979 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Starting a new thread regarding mounting my 2014 OEM wheels to my 2026

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • JAI3
      2016 Sierra 5.3L L83 new injectors now runs rich.

      By JAI3 · Posted

      I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Coastie05
      Will not stay in Reverse

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
    • Grumpy Bear
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      No, but don't skimp on safe! 😉 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Fix one problem and find another.   Truck didn't have a thermostat in it so I flushed out the system today and refilled with 50/50 Dexcool. This truck is so old (LOL) that it has a sticker under the hood alerting people to the fact that it contains such. There is also an orange supplement with the owner's manual alerting the owner that "Your vehicle is one of a number of late production 1995 General Motors vehicles that use a newly developed engine coolant in the cooling system..."   I was still a little flummoxed by what seemed like a rich condition (exhaust smell, and a puff of carbon with a punchy rev). While watching the coolant temperature and testing the thermostat with my scanner, I happened to notice the IAT (incoming air temperature) to the intake was -40F. I know the temp is below average today, but I can still feel my face, and I was wearing shorts.   D'oh!! I realized I had never plugged the IAT back in, and the airbox was out while I was doing coolant. So I paused, reinstalled the airbox and plugged in the IAT, and viola. Things cleared right up, and I watched the coolant temp climb to a reported 198 degrees on the scanner (195 thermostat) and then it dropped to 194 (open) and then back up to 198 and held. Let it cool, came back, checked the coolant level and was satisifed.   Victory lap?   It needed more than the couple of gallons of gas I put in it from almost bone dry, so I ran it up to the gas station. It had earned it, or, at least I was pretty certain I wouldn't be draining or removing the tank anytime soon.   CEL popped on just as I was cruising a nice steady 40mph, just after coasting down a slight downhill curve.. Of course, it did, because, why let me enjoy not having dash emojis for a little while.   I just happened to have the scanner plugged in. I don't text and drive but I might scan and drive. Don't tell the police.   P0401, EGR flow insufficient.    Well, hello, EGR... ...my old friend! Welcome to the party, now that the engine reaches the factory-programmed operating temperature. I'm sure it was gagging on hostile, rich exhaust and carbon this whole time so I'll take it off and look again.   At least it's easily accessible, and worst case, about $65 to replace.   To keep, or to sell... Hmm. I want it running correctly either way. It's easier to sell when there are no fault codes.   It needs tires (they're aged out and cracking)   It could probably use an oil pan seal, or maybe the timing cover gasket/ junction with the pan needs redone because I've got an issue there that leaves a drop of oil on the floor.   If I do tires I'm sure they'll say the ball joints could use freshening, and, and, and, and.... At some point I'll have to stop. I can't (shouldn't) make it perfect, that's not what this rig is.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...