Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

No issues this morning - about 15 degrees when I left the house. I did clean all of the parking sensors with a dampened rag, scraped a little stray ice from in front of the collision/lane keep camera and used some compressed air to blow out the trailer connections before I left the house. Not sure if that made any difference or not, or if I just got lucky this morning. It's supposed to be below zero a good chunk of this week so we'll see...

Posted

I have had my 2019 1500 for two months now. The check trailer connection alert started 1 month ago. I took it to the dealer and they cleaned and greased the plug. Happened again, they ordered and replaced the plug. Cleared it up for about two weeks, problem started again two days ago. 

This morning I sent the dealer a video of the symptoms to make sure I was explaining it properly.

I had the same problems with my 2014 1500. 

Posted (edited)

No doubt in the world the cold weather is causing it.  Just look where everyone lives who is complaining.  And with the arctic front diving south this week, additional folks are having this problem.  I have 3.5K miles on my truck (which I love btw) and got my alert yesterday when it was 15 degrees.  I would bet money that this is a hardware issue and not a software issue.  The cold is causing something to contract and a code is being thrown to the truck. 

 

This should not be hard for GM to figure out with the team of folks they have.  They also better get ahead of it before it blows up in their face.  This forum has sounded the alarm and given GM time to fix this before others are affected or before others choose to buy something else.  The vehicle industry is hurting right now,  GM cannot afford to lose sales.

Edited by Nocar
  • Like 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Nocar said:

No doubt in the world the cold weather is causing it.  Just look where everyone lives who is complaining.  And with the arctic front diving south this week, additional folks are having this problem.  I have 3.5K miles on my truck (which I love btw) and got my alert yesterday when it was 15 degrees.  I would bet money that this is a hardware issue and not a software issue.  The cold is causing something to contract and a code is being thrown to the truck. 

 

This should not be hard for GM to figure out with the team of folks they have.  They also better get ahead of it before it blows up in their face.  This forum has sounded the alarm and given GM time to fix this before others are affected or before others choose to buy something else.  The vehicle industry is hurting right now,  GM cannot afford to lose sales.

NOT ALL TRUCKS lol.

 

Seriously though I've been cringing and waiting wondering if this will happen to me over the last couple days.  Here it's been 2-8° F the last couple days, but no drama with my truck so far. *knock on wood*

 

Posted

Mine is sitting at the shop so they can try to reproduce it there.  Not sure if it will do any good but they have a call know GM to see if they can expedite a fix to me and hopefully the rest of us.  I’ll update later today if I hear anything. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Brandon Gilbert said:

Mine is sitting at the shop so they can try to reproduce it there.  Not sure if it will do any good but they have a call know GM to see if they can expedite a fix to me and hopefully the rest of us.  I’ll update later today if I hear anything. 

My dealer couldn't reproduce it, but then I found out they had it sitting inside for a couple of hours before a short test drive. Make sure they park it outside, let the truck get cold and then drive it. Once my dealer did that they saw the problem straight away. Also doesn't hurt to record it on your cell phone either. 

Posted

Mine did this for the first time today.  27 degrees outside.  Both outside front sensors. 

Posted

Update...truck picked up they identified a connector issue waiting for GM to push a fix down but they are well aware hopefully in the next week or two the fix is released.

Posted
Update...truck picked up they identified a connector issue waiting for GM to push a fix down but they are well aware hopefully in the next week or two the fix is released.
Could you be more specific regarding "a connector issue" ?

Are we talking the trailer connection?

Sent from my SM-N960W using Tapatalk

Posted
24 minutes ago, KA0S said:

Could you be more specific regarding "a connector issue" ?

Are we talking the trailer connection?

Sent from my SM-N960W using Tapatalk
 

Just heard from my dealer as well... There is a new "plug" which he described as the trailer plug/connector that you attach the lighting harness. He also mentioned that there is an update to the programming as well that will be coming "soon". He was under the impression that the plug/connector is available to order and they will be getting the part number from GM tomorrow. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I wish I could but that’s all they really told me.  They feel they have it isolated and we have to wait until an official fix gets pushed from GM.  

Posted

Awesome, happy to hear a fix is in the works. If anyone gets the TSB or part # I would love to have it so the dealer knows what I’m talking about when I bring mine in.

 

In regards to your parking sensors, mine were a bit wonky the other day. I don’t think it’s tied to this issue though. Cleaning them seemed to clear it up. Even a tiny piece of ice seems to cause problems with those. 

Posted
Just heard from my dealer as well... There is a new "plug" which he described as the trailer plug/connector that you attach the lighting harness. He also mentioned that there is an update to the programming as well that will be coming "soon". He was under the impression that the plug/connector is available to order and they will be getting the part number from GM tomorrow. 
 
Thanks very much. I will pass this info on to my dealer as well.

Sent from my SM-N960W using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 0 Anonymous, 563 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...