Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

After going back and forth between 295/70r18s and 275/70r18s I finally pulled the trigger and went with 295/70's in a Cooper AT3 XLT, happy with the decision. 

20210526_100116.thumb.jpg.a046f1044d453df2fffe79a8b2b2e3f4.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Daly said:

After going back and forth between 295/70r18s and 275/70r18s I finally pulled the trigger and went with 295/70's in a Cooper AT3 XLT, happy with the decision. 

20210526_100116.thumb.jpg.a046f1044d453df2fffe79a8b2b2e3f4.jpg

Looks nice!!! I ready to take my truck into my buddy’s shop and get some tires of same size put on. Reminds, I’ll have to do a before and after pic.

 

Any modifications like trimming or lift?

Posted (edited)

Had my friend mount some Toyo Open Country RTs 295/70/18s. They look great! Feels and sounds better than the stock Goodyear Duratracs.

 

BEFORE

spacer.pngspacer.png

 

AFTER

spacer.png

spacer.png

Edited by NotoriousGT350
  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 3/31/2019 at 11:20 PM, Leevon said:

275/70r18 BFG K02's on 1.75" spacers.  Slight rub on reverse at full turn, not enough to do anything about.  

IMG_8530.jpg

IMG_8528.jpg

 

Question about the tires…Are they noticeably taller than the stock Duratracs?  How’s the ride, any complaints?  I have an appointment to get the same thing installed tomorrow.  Beginning to have second thoughts about not going with a bigger size, but I’ve always had good luck with the KO2s.

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/21/2019 at 10:57 AM, xAISxCR34M said:

I was able to fit 295/70r18 Nitto Ridge Grapplers on the stock wheels. No rubbing what’s so over. They fit perfectly.

53B03928-46A3-4406-A410-8543368CFE5F.jpeg

8D8D4D01-4CE2-43B9-9F22-32D325B5333C.jpeg

4A49E6F9-7703-4E95-988C-CE2869BBBF06.jpeg

29103420-3BAC-45EA-9336-B51A9447BB4B.jpeg

Don't know if you're still following this, but this looks great.  How is it with the Ridge Grapplers and the 295s on stock left and rims?  Any problems?  No rubbing, not even in reverse? It almost looks like it has been leveled.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Anyone had success with running a 295/70R18 with 18x9 0 offset wheels on stock suspension Trail Boss? Would prefer no rub, and I’m cool with doing mud flap mod/mild trimming. Thanks! 

Posted
6 hours ago, clocke said:

Anyone had success with running a 295/70R18 with 18x9 0 offset wheels on stock suspension Trail Boss? Would prefer no rub, and I’m cool with doing mud flap mod/mild trimming. Thanks! 

Yeah I ran the Method 309s 18x9 zero offset with Falken Wildpeaks 295/70/18 and all that was rubbing was the mudflap so I took it off. But now I have a level kit as well just to make it look even. 

Posted (edited)

Put on Mickey Thompson Baja Boss A/T 295/70R18 on the stock wheels the other day.  Look great and are really aggressive, which I like... Put they do rub just ever so slightly at full lock.  And that's leveled and with 1.25" spacers.

 

20210813_162326.jpg

 

 

IMG_20210815_140948.jpg

 

 

20210813_162317.jpg

Edited by Swiftks
  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 5/26/2021 at 11:03 AM, Daly said:

After going back and forth between 295/70r18s and 275/70r18s I finally pulled the trigger and went with 295/70's in a Cooper AT3 XLT, happy with the decision. 

20210526_100116.thumb.jpg.a046f1044d453df2fffe79a8b2b2e3f4.jpg

Since this thread is old any chance you can update how the noise level is? Especially if you can compare to the Duratracs. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...