Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I used to see the album art show up for each song on my 2016.  Doesn't seem to show up on my 2019. Am I missing something? I store all my music on a USB drive.  I have an RST with convenience II package. 

Posted (edited)

I think it has to be in the file folder with the music file to show up.

 

Edit: according to the manual, it can also be in the ID3 tag in the MP3 file itself. There are MP3 tag editors you can use to check.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 

Edited by ftwhite
read the manual
Posted

I am not sure if this is what it is in your particular situation, but I've been told that many of the new cars/trucks are discontinuing album art due to "distractions/safety".

Posted

I do see the album art when I click in individual folders and see ALL the tracks for a particular artist or album... just not when I play a song.  

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Gm called me back. They will not display album art on xm or us, he said it will work with Android auto but I haven't tried it yet. Pretty disappointing. All other manufacturers still have it from vehicles I have seen.

Posted

I used to get that way with track and band titles not being correct, or proper punctuation. But album art? Don't you thing you are stretching a little? Just drive your truck and listen to the tunes, don't worry about the album art lol. 

Posted

I always liked it and loaded all the albums into my usb key. Some like it some dont care, just not sure why they wouldn't include it.

Posted

My wife’s 2017 Yukon displays the art if, like mentioned above, the art is in the file or contained within the song’s file itself. 

Posted
23 hours ago, Ehlett said:

Gm called me back. They will not display album art on xm or us, he said it will work with Android auto but I haven't tried it yet. Pretty disappointing. All other manufacturers still have it from vehicles I have seen.

I agree, the infotainment screen design is a step back from MyLink if you ask me. It just looks really cheap and dated. Small complaint, but a complaint nonetheless. 

 

 

  • 6 months later...
Posted (edited)

just bought s 2018 Silverado..z71 it used to have albumn art now it dont..im getting my jeep back...this truck suckdsucks

Edited by suzi
spelling
Posted

the album art. did work now it doesn't... awful.. getting my Jeep back or ill get another radio thst will also play movies... while driving.. my jeep was set up that way..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...