Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The answer is No.

2019 T1 Gm trucks have a completely new air intake setup that comes thru the top of the grille and to the drivers side for intake.

The intake picture you posted is for the previous gen K2.

Posted

To the OP, unless you live in central America, there is plenty of cold air to go around right now, I belong to other forums and the most popular topic is where is my block heater plug, lol. With a new p/u with a new intake system, I would bide my time, let someone else be the guinea pig to see if a CAI is worth it on this new generation.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 1/28/2019 at 2:13 PM, Sierra Dan said:

Yeah, I found that one, but with only 13% more airflow, its not worth the cost, considering the K&N for previous year is only $280.  I will wait for K&N or AFE to produce something.  At least I hope they will!

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

K&n has their 2019 Silverado intake up for pre order on their site. A rep told me they should ship out soon since production has started. 

  • Like 2
Posted
11 hours ago, DanHc said:

K&n has their 2019 Silverado intake up for pre order on their site. A rep told me they should ship out soon since production has started. 

That’s great news, good find!  Now I’m curious if we have to tune the engine after installation?  I know some others said that might be necessary.. but i didn’t see that in the instructions.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Trailboss75 said:

That’s great news, good find!  Now I’m curious if we have to tune the engine after installation?  I know some others said that might be necessary.. but i didn’t see that in the instructions.

I was one of those checking every other day on their site to see when it would be available lol and that I know of you don’t have to tune it the computer will eventually adapt to the extra airflow and change what needs to be changed. The GM intake comes with the “tune” so the computer won’t have to do it itself. (Don’t quote me on this information it’s just something I got told) 

Posted
4 minutes ago, DanHc said:

I was one of those checking every other day on their site to see when it would be available lol and that I know of you don’t have to tune it the computer will eventually adapt to the extra airflow and change what needs to be changed. The GM intake comes with the “tune” so the computer won’t have to do it itself. (Don’t quote me on this information it’s just something I got told) 

On the 6.2 per the webpage above, it says it increases 17% airflow, I wouldn't imagine that there is that much adjustability in the ECU perimeters for that difference. Which is why they have a calibration for the intake. 

Posted

It's a bit expensive for plastic and a rubber hose connected to the throttle body...

  • Like 1
Posted

New Era Performance released theirs.  Expensive at $400+, but 16hp/21tq on the 5.3 seems fairly good.  

 

Im was gonna wait and see what else came out but the plan is to dyno before and after the intake for my 6.2

Posted
48 minutes ago, MadCaddie said:

New Era Performance released theirs.  Expensive at $400+, but 16hp/21tq on the 5.3 seems fairly good.  

 

Im was gonna wait and see what else came out but the plan is to dyno before and after the intake for my 6.2

K&N saying theirs makes 15.7hp/32.5tq on the 6.2

Posted
14 minutes ago, DanHc said:

K&N saying theirs makes 15.7hp/32.5tq on the 6.2

I wonder what this fine print means:

 

“Horsepower gains based on similar vehicle dynamometer test. Results will vary.”

 

Those numbers seem pretty sensational and don’t really mesh when you consider the numbers gained from the AT4 off road performance package, which includes both the GM performance exhaust and the GM intake.

 

“Thanks to these additions, the AT4 Off-Road Package delivers 435 horsepower and 469 lb-ft of torque - increases of 15 horsepower and 9 lb-ft of torque over a Sierra equipped with a conventional 6.2L.”

 

The GM exhaust from that truck is listed in the accessories store as being good for +13hp and +8tq by itself. Simple math would then indicate that the GM intake is then only good for +2hp and +1tq. That would explain why GM doesn’t directly publish the gains from the intake apart from a % airflow increase...pretty sad.

 

So, either the GM CAI is terrible, the K&N is really great, or someone is lying???

 

Curious what everyone makes of this because I am definitely in the market. That said, I’m not in love with using a K&N oiled filter and destroying my MAF sensor...

 

 

Posted

63-3109_dyno.pdf

Found the dyno sheet for the K&N. Pretty impressive. Guess I got some thinking to do.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The curb weight on a 1 ton crew cab long bed is around 7k lbs.  Now, I don't know where you went to school but 9k is not more than 2x 7k lbs. More than 2x 7k lbs would be 14k+.   With that said, obviously yes you're going to feel a 9k lb trailer when slowing down.  I already said, when accelerating.  When changing lanes?  No.  But if you look at the context of what was quoted, the original person said, "after a mile or two..." which means that would be after the accelerating portion and you're driving a generally steady pace.  Please do learn to read and comprehend.
    • So I purchased the Range unit for my 2026 and I am seeing different locations suggested for the ECM . Can anyone confirm wither under hood, left side or right side or behind the wheelwell?
    • Like I've said before. Di and Carbon buildup is not that big of a concern. Engine had minimal buildup, and that engine was obviously not super well maintained. Do regular oil changes, and you're gtg as long as the rest of the truck lasts. Also, the High Pressure FP that people ****** about, but can't tell you why.  Now, I wish they'd trash the variable oil pump. No real world issues with them, but I'll gladly eat whatever miniscule MPG it's saving me in favor of more oil at all RPMs.    Curious to see his assessment of the 7.3 compared to the 6.6. I expect he'll praise the port inj, but from a structural standpoint, the 6.6 is as robust as any engine out there.    Not to take away from the 7.3. I feel it's equally as good as the 6.6.     As to heat on the rear cyls, I'd have to see numerous examples before I'd say it's an issue. Especially not knowing the history of that engine. For all is known, they could have blown a rad hose, and ran it hot, and the 2 rear cyls may be the first to get hot in a low coolant situation, but not be an issue aside from that. 
    • "Life is getting back to normal."    I'm driving again and all new joints are operating as expected for this stage of recovery.   My most recent joint replacement still requires a lot of attention but experience has taught me that time will quiet the remaining pain.  I joked with my surgeon that another joint replacement would take my mind off my most recent surgery and he responded by saying the next will be a hip!  There are no plans for another surgery but, unlike me, I don't think he was joking!  I certainly wouldn't refuse further replacement  if required but hope to spend time out of the "post-op"  period.  I can't stress enough that if you have been recommended for total hip, knee or shoulder replacement that you welcome the offer.  Post-op "recovery" may sound daunting and painful, however, this is far better than the insidious erosion of mobility you are currently experiencing.  Imagine what it would feel like to wake up most mornings feeling better and more mobile than you did the previous day!  Prior to my first surgery in June 2025, even getting out of bed was becoming a formidable task.  Since the day after my first surgery, I get out of bed everyday easily and unassisted.  Making the switch to feeling a little better each day rather than a little worse, is hugely motivating!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...