Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

I wonder what this fine print means:

 

“Horsepower gains based on similar vehicle dynamometer test. Results will vary.”

 

Those numbers seem pretty sensational and don’t really mesh when you consider the numbers gained from the AT4 off road performance package, which includes both the GM performance exhaust and the GM intake.

 

“Thanks to these additions, the AT4 Off-Road Package delivers 435 horsepower and 469 lb-ft of torque - increases of 15 horsepower and 9 lb-ft of torque over a Sierra equipped with a conventional 6.2L.”

 

The GM exhaust from that truck is listed in the accessories store as being good for +13hp and +8tq by itself. Simple math would then indicate that the GM intake is then only good for +2hp and +1tq. That would explain why GM doesn’t directly publish the gains from the intake apart from a % airflow increase...pretty sad.

 

So, either the GM CAI is terrible, the K&N is really great, or someone is lying???

 

Curious what everyone makes of this because I am definitely in the market. That said, I’m not in love with using a K&N oiled filter and destroying my MAF sensor...

 

 

Not sure but I’ve always put k&n intakes on my trucks and never had a problem with the MAF sensor. Besides that they sound great

  • Thanks 1
Posted
63-3109_dyno.pdf
Found the dyno sheet for the K&N. Pretty impressive. Guess I got some thinking to do.



Wonder why they would run a 10 speed in 3rd. I guess the mph limiter was in the way of running it in the proper gear without tuning. I run 10speeds in 6th on the dyno even though 7th is 1:1
  • Like 1
Posted

You have to take the cold air intake test results with a grain of salt. Is the air filter/filter-box sealed, or open? Most dyno tests are run with the hood open, and a large cooling fan placed in front of the vehicle. If the CAI has an open air box (no sealed lid like the GM) the cooling fan and extra air can elevate the HP/TQ output figures, but once you close the hood the filter element doesn't get as much air as when it was open, therefore not as much HP/TQ as the manufacturer claimed. CAI dyno test results with a closed air box (like the GM factory CAI) may more closely resemble real-life gains. Also, some dynamometer brands give higher readings than others, so some CAI manufacturers will use the higher reading dynos for their tests.

 

Another important feature of a closed air box is less resonance/drone in the cab while driving. If the hood is what seals the air box, it will pick up extra noise & vibrations, transmitting them to the firewall and cab. A sealed box also guarantees that your intake won't be sucking hot under-hood air, only the cooler outside air. Filters also tend to stay cleaner in a sealed box.

 

I used to run K&N CAI's but switched to the Cold Air Inductions brand on my 2012 & 2015 Camaros. Couldn't be happier. Check out the Cold Air Inductions website: https://www.coldairinductions.com/  Their 2019 Silverado/ Sierra CAI's should be out soon. The GM factory intakes are similar.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Interesting inputs @Jack D, and good point about the noise as well. I wouldn’t mind a little growl but I don’t want too much. 

 

The K&N one looks to be sealed. Right now I’m torn between K&N, the GM, and the one linked below from AFE which is also sealed and looks to also have a resonator on the tube where the PCV line comes in.

 

Regardless, neither one of the aftermarket ones are available at the moment. K&N is sold out and the AFE not available until May.

 

AFE could swing me as they offer it with a dry filter and still produces reasonably good numbers. I know my concerns about oil fouling the MAF are not founded so long as the filter isn’t over saturated, but I feel like from a warranty standpoint, GM couldn’t really give me any grief about using a dry filter since that’s what their own CAI uses.

 

https://afepower.com/afe-power-50-70044r-momentum-gt-pro-5r-cold-air-intake-system

Posted
15 hours ago, OnTheReel said:

Interesting inputs @Jack D, and good point about the noise as well. I wouldn’t mind a little growl but I don’t want too much. 

 

The K&N one looks to be sealed. Right now I’m torn between K&N, the GM, and the one linked below from AFE which is also sealed and looks to also have a resonator on the tube where the PCV line comes in.

 

Regardless, neither one of the aftermarket ones are available at the moment. K&N is sold out and the AFE not available until May.

 

AFE could swing me as they offer it with a dry filter and still produces reasonably good numbers. I know my concerns about oil fouling the MAF are not founded so long as the filter isn’t over saturated, but I feel like from a warranty standpoint, GM couldn’t really give me any grief about using a dry filter since that’s what their own CAI uses.

 

https://afepower.com/afe-power-50-70044r-momentum-gt-pro-5r-cold-air-intake-system

I'd get the AFE one for sure.  At least it looks a little nicer than the K&N...I know looks don't mean much when it's under a closed hood, but I feel like it looks more "premium" than the K&N.....

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Jordan Spence said:

From what I’ve saw on a K & N  I wouldn’t even consider one.. 

Can you elaborate on that? Because I just put my order in.... 

Posted

I’ve heard that cold air intakes improve mpg. Is this true?

Posted

The new Silverado's actually already have a cold air system on them. Check out this video.

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, carnau said:

The new Silverado's actually already have a cold air system on them. Check out this video.

 

Everything is different in the T1. Air box is on the driver’s side now. While I don’t doubt it is set up similarly, as are most OEM airboxes, there is still room for improvement. Ditching the stock intake tube and it’s big resonator thing was always a nice power gain on the K2s. Between that, a better filter and a better box I think there’s some power to be had. Supposedly some fuel economy too though I never noticed a difference. Probably have my foot to the floor too much.

Posted
2 hours ago, DanHc said:

Can you elaborate on that? Because I just put my order in.... 

Well I’ll put it this way. In the sand that we farm in they won’t stop the dust.  In 90% of other situations they will be fine ime sure!

Posted
3 minutes ago, Jordan Spence said:

Well I’ll put it this way. In the sand that we farm in they won’t stop the dust.  In 90% of other situations they will be fine ime sure!

I would say the same would go for virtually any aftermarket filter, not just the K&N.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 3/5/2019 at 4:31 PM, MadCaddie said:

New Era Performance released theirs.  Expensive at $400+, but 16hp/21tq on the 5.3 seems fairly good.  

 

Im was gonna wait and see what else came out but the plan is to dyno before and after the intake for my 6.2

I will have one for sale off my AT4 in a couple months. I did not know this till after I ordered my truck. I am getting whipples supercharger for my 6.2 and it gets rid of the GMC upgraded air filter. It will be brand new and I will probably advertise around 250 plus shipping. Send me a message if you think you will be interested. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Bfdfreddie said:

I will have one for sale off my AT4 in a couple months. I did not know this till after I ordered my truck. I am getting whipples supercharger for my 6.2 and it gets rid of the GMC upgraded air filter. It will be brand new and I will probably advertise around 250 plus shipping. Send me a message if you think you will be interested. 

Im definitely interested, but I don't think you're going to be able to SC anytime soon.  That's something I plan on doing as well, but until they crack our ECMs, it's a no go. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,716
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    BDS my HD
    Newest Member
    BDS my HD
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 476 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hello hello looking forward to expanding my knowledge of the 2026 2500 HD that I just bought.   Truck has 3500 miles on it four-wheel-drive crew cab and I’m about to put a 6 1/2 inch BDS lift on it 18 x 10 -25 offset with 37’s   Already have the wheels and tires just waiting on the lift install in about three weeks   Question what surprises am I not gonna be happy with?  I’m not new to lifted trucks so I know that acceleration towing gas mileage all that is affected..   Question is those of you that have this truck this powertrain with a 10 speed Allison and have done the mods that I’m doing,,, how bad is it? Is that Allison constantly gonna be hunting for the right gear to go into? And what about towing, acceleration, fuel consumption as mentioned?    Lastly how come I can’t find any ring pinion gear set up for these axles and when could I expect to see them?   I apologize if there’s any typos I’m doing speech to text on my iPhone.    
    • I've got a 2013 2500 6.0L Flexfuel. Drove the truck earlier today with no issues. Went to run an errand tonight and noticed key fob wouldn't work. Figured battery was dead, so replaced fob batter. Still wasn't working. Grabbed my other set of keys with the other fob and that one wasn't working either. So I manually unlock truck and insert key. Interior lights come on, dashboard lights up, turn key and truck starts. Turn truck off, like a moron, and try starting again. This time no crank, no click, no nothing. Lights still come on and dash lights up, but now I'm getting a service 4wheel drive, service tire monitor, etc. Check voltage on battery and Im showing 12.2v. Throw my battery charger on it and give it 15 mins and try starting again. But still no crank no start. Decide maybe its a bad battery, run to autozone grab a new one and put it in. Same issue. Disconnect battery and let it sit for 15 mins. Try again and still nothing. I had managed to roll the windows down earlier as its a humid night, but now I can't get them to roll up. Power locks are also not working now. Then randomly I try the key again, and it fires right up. Immediately I roll up the windows as we have nothing but rain forecast this week. I shut it back off wait 30 seconds and start up again. Worked a 2nd time. So turn it off, start putting things back together. Try one more time, and back to no crank no start. And now the car alarm starts going off. Had to disconnect battery and leave it that way for the night as I don't think my neighbors would appreciate my alarm going off again tonight. Any thoughts or help would be appreciated. 
    • No one will care for you like you care for you. Do what you can for as long as you can. IMHO of course. 
    • How about them NICKS!!! 
    • Hi there.  Long time lurker, first post.    i have read the previous posts regarding the water ingress problem with this emblem.  I bought my 1500 SLT the  summer of 2025 new and after reading the MANY problems with these emblems failing I decided to install one anyways.  As per a YouTube video, I sealed ( or tried to) this sign with silicone sealant around the outer perimeter joint and the holes that were already somewhat sealed on the rear plate of the emblem.  And installed the connector assembly using dielectric grease on the connectors. The installation looked great and worked well for about 4 months……then FAILURE.  Grrrrrr…… I live in the great white north and wash my truck weekly in an automatic car wash  to keep the salt off.  Let me tell you that removing the old, failed emblem is a whole different animal than removing the OEM individual letters without removing the grill assembly. Mainly because the illuminated logo is built differently than the original letters which  you can remove the red surface lettering with a knife or some kind of blade which gives access to the tabs which hold the logo onto the grill. So I had to essentially destroyed the old emblem to remove it. Doing so killed my chance of doing somekind of autopsy on the failed , old logo.  But there was plenty of water inside when I ripped it apart.  Prior to installing the new assembly I tried it with the old harness and it works fine.   Does anyone have any insight as to where the water is getting into this emblem? I intend to seal the new logo with slow curing epoxy this time around using a syringe.  I think this newer emblem may be an updated unit which I hope GM got the vendor to fix. It has an October 2025 date on it.    If this one  fails,  I am just going to revert back to the non-illuminated letters….AFTER PULLING THE GRILL.    Any thoughts on sealing with epoxy would be appreciated. Thx!   Doug  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...