Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Any idea why the 6.2 oil spec is 0/20, besides the same 'ol line about that being what the engineers spec'd.  Does the DFM require it? Something else?  Or is it just CAFE?  

0/20 will shear and DI engines are known for fuel dilution.  What are your thoughts? 

Posted

To me it is more about CAFE then anything.  The fact that we have 8 qt sumps and the Camaro has 10qt sumps, they are compensating for the fuel dilution with a larger sump.  As for shear.  It depends on the oil used.  I'm able to run 15k miles  on our 2016 Suburban running AMSOIL's Signature Series 0w-20.  Used oil analysis results say it is safe to that point. 

 

So for me it is more on CAFE than anything.  I'm sure the engineers have factored it in on the design of the oil system since it is just more than a pump and a relief valve and is controlled by the ECM now to work with AFM and in some engines VVT.

Posted
1 minute ago, Black02Silverado said:

To me it is more about CAFE then anything.  The fact that we have 8 qt sumps and the Camaro has 10qt sumps, they are compensating for the fuel dilution with a larger sump.  As for shear.  It depends on the oil used.  I'm able to run 15k miles  on our 2016 Suburban running AMSOIL's Signature Series 0w-20.  Used oil analysis results say it is safe to that point. 

 

So for me it is more on CAFE than anything.  I'm sure the engineers have factored it in on the design of the oil system since it is just more than a pump and a relief valve and is controlled by the ECM now to work with AFM and in some engines VVT.

Yeah, I'm planning to run the 0/20 until the OLM yells at me.  I tow specifically with this vehicle, so we'll see.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sierra Dan said:

0/20 for 5.3 also.

It's all about squeezing every ounce of mileage out of these trucks.

5/20 or 5/30 would probably be fine (que in the voided warranty crowd) 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sierra Dan said:

There is a huge topic about this over on the K2 forum.

Thanks.  I'll head over there a bit later.  

Posted (edited)

Cue the “keyboard engineers” saying they know better than GM about what oil to run.

 

Sorry, as of 2014 and up, the oiling system on these has gotten a lot more complex so I just run what they tell me. Plus, modern oils are so damned good these days it’s just not worth a worry.

Edited by OnTheReel
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I’m wondering if running Amsoil Signature Series “100% Synthetic” helps with valves gumming up cause I found with Mobile One Full Synthetic Annual protection and the Amsoil Signature series both being 0W20.

Both oils were light tan in color new.

Mobile one 500 miles was black in color
Amsoil 500 miles was light tan in color

Theory would be that a 100% man made synth oil burns and carbons less than an engine oil with conventional oil. This being I’m assuming you’ll have less carbon buildup on the valves.

I’m not going to start probing my engine and taking it apart in order to test this theory but this was interesting non the less, Amsoil (visually) seems to burn and breakdown much slower. I’m currently using Amsoil in everything except the Transmission fluid as it’s only got 16k on it with zero issues.

Summer time in Texas, it gets VERY HOT, I’m going to run 5w30 and see if there’s any difference at all on mileage or the way the engine runs.


Sent from above

  • Like 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, TXGREEK said:

I’m wondering if running Amsoil Signature Series “100% Synthetic” helps with valves gumming up cause I found with Mobile One Full Synthetic Annual protection and the Amsoil Signature series both being 0W20.

Both oils were light tan in color new.

Mobile one 500 miles was black in color
Amsoil 500 miles was light tan in color

Theory would be that a 100% man made synth oil burns and carbons less than an engine oil with conventional oil. This being I’m assuming you’ll have less carbon buildup on the valves.

I’m not going to start probing my engine and taking it apart in order to test this theory but this was interesting non the less, Amsoil (visually) seems to burn and breakdown much slower. I’m currently using Amsoil in everything except the Transmission fluid as it’s only got 16k on it with zero issues.

Summer time in Texas, it gets VERY HOT, I’m going to run 5w30 and see if there’s any difference at all on mileage or the way the engine runs.


Sent from above

Curious to hear about your experiment TX.

Let us know if it makes the engine a bit quieter.

  • Like 1
Posted
49 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Cue the “keyboard engineers” saying they know better than GM about what oil to run.

 

Sorry, as of 2014 and up, the oiling system on these has gotten a lot more complex so I just run what they tell me. Plus, modern oils are so damned good these days it’s just not worth a worry.

Wow! Where would one start? Lets start with 'know better than GM'. Well skip over the inability to tell the difference between a 'keyboard engineer' and an actual Engineer. Lets go strait to LOGIC 101.

 

You want to side (trust explicitly) with GM in choosing the lubricant because 'they know better'. Okay.

 

Is this the same set of engineers that designed the AFM system you bypassed because it's a piece of junk? The same engineers that designed the cam and lifters that fail.  Oil pumps that fail. Vacuum pumps that fail. EPS that fails. Transmissions that are 'stumbling drunks'. Driveshafts that explode. Axels the wobble. The same engineers that test your failed equipment and deny your warranty claims. The guys the designed your PCV system so ineffective you put catch cans on. Those engineers? 

 

Let's move on to 'complex oiling systems'. We could argue that but it might be more productive to ask that even if that were true, and I'm not in agreement that it is, how did that change the lubrication function and interaction between the oil and the things it lubricates. Yea, the fundamental requirements are the same for babbitt bearings in your grandfathers Model T as the are in a GP bike. Provide a film thick enough and strong enough. Cool. Clean. Fight friction. 

 

Does it matter how 'good' the oil is if you insist on mistreating it, ignoring it and expecting to much from it? I haven't seen a light bulb come on yet for anyone that tells me they understand the significance of the OPERATIONAL temperature/viscosity relationship beyond what it says on the a data sheet. 

 

You want to argue that the VVT/DOD wont work properly or the engine will be damaged due to 'wrong' viscosity if any other oil but 0W20 is used but fail to grasp that a guy like me that drives the double nickel and whose bulk oil temperature is 195 F vs a guy that is towing 10,000 lbs. in the desert at 70 mph with a bulk temperature is 250 F has already EFFECTIVELY moved the viscosity FOUR SAE steps. 20W to 50W is the spread between these two temperatures to obtain the same 'running' viscosity. Yet both systems work just dandy. 

 

You know this well enough to be dismissive of 'keyboard' engineers. Let me take a WAG. I'm being mean. :rolleyes:

 

 

Posted

K.I.S.S.= Keep It Simple Stupid.

I try not to over think things and make them complicated, makes life easier.

This is the reason I still do 3 K mile OCI.

If I run my oil temp high while towing or my trans fluid no big deal to me because I change my fluids more than most.

As far as viscosity, I use the recommended viscosity until higher mileage or oil usage goes up.

Simple.

 

:)

 

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Wow! Where would one start? Lets start with 'know better than GM'. Well skip over the inability to tell the difference between a 'keyboard engineer' and an actual Engineer. Lets go strait to LOGIC 101.

 

You want to side (trust explicitly) with GM in choosing the lubricant because 'they know better'. Okay.

 

Is this the same set of engineers that designed the AFM system you bypassed because it's a piece of junk? The same engineers that designed the cam and lifters that fail.  Oil pumps that fail. Vacuum pumps that fail. EPS that fails. Transmissions that are 'stumbling drunks'. Driveshafts that explode. Axels the wobble. The same engineers that test your failed equipment and deny your warranty claims. The guys the designed your PCV system so ineffective you put catch cans on. Those engineers? 

 

Let's move on to 'complex oiling systems'. We could argue that but it might be more productive to ask that even if that were true, and I'm not in agreement that it is, how did that change the lubrication function and interaction between the oil and the things it lubricates. Yea, the fundamental requirements are the same for babbitt bearings in your grandfathers Model T as the are in a GP bike. Provide a film thick enough and strong enough. Cool. Clean. Fight friction. 

 

Does it matter how 'good' the oil is if you insist on mistreating it, ignoring it and expecting to much from it? I haven't seen a light bulb come on yet for anyone that tells me they understand the significance of the OPERATIONAL temperature/viscosity relationship beyond what it says on the a data sheet. 

 

You want to argue that the VVT/DOD wont work properly or the engine will be damaged due to 'wrong' viscosity if any other oil but 0W20 is used but fail to grasp that a guy like me that drives the double nickel and whose bulk oil temperature is 195 F vs a guy that is towing 10,000 lbs. in the desert at 70 mph with a bulk temperature is 250 F has already EFFECTIVELY moved the viscosity FOUR SAE steps. 20W to 50W is the spread between these two temperatures to obtain the same 'running' viscosity. Yet both systems work just dandy. 

 

You know this well enough to be dismissive of 'keyboard' engineers. Let me take a WAG. I'm being mean. :rolleyes:

 

 

 

I’m not exactly sure what you’re arguing for, or against, but in all of that post, you’ve yet to show me any indication that running 5w30 or anything else outside of recommended will give a longer engine life. This was the root of the OP’s question and you’ve got nothing.

 

Further, your refusal to acknowledge that the oiling system is more complex than ever is just being foolish. These have a two stage oil pump, VVT and more AFM lifters than ever to run the DFM program. All of these things are based off of, and calibrated to the hydraulic properties of the recommended oil (at ALL temps). 

 

You are also now dealing with Start/Stop on these engines. Dexos gen 2 was formulated with all of these factors in mind so why run anything else? I’ll take their engineers over your speculation any day.

  • Like 1
Posted

As a guy that put 190,000 miles on a 2014 6.2 this is what I found.  At around 140-150 I started seeing oil usage.  I had been using 0/20 as required up until that point.  I was able to get an additional 50,000 until the cam bearings had been worn bad enough that the shaft started squeaking and the damage had been done.  I am running this one from the start on 5/30 and my dealership agrees.  They have always done the oil changes and agree the oil is simply to thin.  Everything on the new engine is perfect with 5/30 and oil pressures are just a tick higher.  I have 11,000 miles on new engine and the idle is like glass.  AFM even seems smoother after break-in.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...