Jump to content

Long Term AFM disabler experience


Recommended Posts

Posted

Have not had to ever add any motor oil between oil changes with AFM disabled.

 

Use the Hypertech MaxEnergy 2.0 to disable AFM. $350

 

That programmer is worth every penny.

 

 

Posted

Again, not trying to thread jack or anything, but what is available for the DFM technology?  I know Range Technology says they have one coming and I have written to ask if they know when and to be put on the list for the first batch and even offered to beta test if needed because I wouldn't even mind a short term disabler until a proper tune can be done.  The auto start/stop is easy to defeat but I want to be able to disable and control the DFM on my 2019 GMC Sierra Denali 3.5L engine which I do not use for towing, have another truck for that. I am more than happy to start a new thread for DFM technology discussions if it doesn't belong here, but I didn't see one so I just threw my question in here.  

Posted

I've got about 7k with the range in the past 6 months. I have noticed zero issues so far. I'll be pissed if I ever have any warranty issues because I would definitely get a tune.

Posted

Plugging in these AFM disablers doesn't trip the flash counter the dealer sees when you try to bring it in for warranty work, does it?

Posted
59 minutes ago, the33z33 said:

Plugging in these AFM disablers doesn't trip the flash counter the dealer sees when you try to bring it in for warranty work, does it?

According to Range no it doesn’t. If you take it in for regular maintenance remove it and plug it back in afterwards. If going in for major repairs/ emissions testing remove 10 key cycles prior to taking it in.

Posted
On 5/8/2019 at 11:54 AM, Sierra Dan said:

Yes, a true Deletion not a plug in disabler.

The Rough price is for the kit only.

$750 for the cam and lifters and another $750 for a tune.  Getting quite expensive. And it completely voids any type of power train warranty.

Posted
On 5/6/2019 at 12:20 PM, Bonjosco3ss said:

Mine is range and works fine but I have to take it out for about 2 weeks before inspection is due otherwise it won’t pass. It wouldn’t let my computer run complete tests.

I’m in upstate NY. Are you downstate where there are more restrictive tests?

Posted
I’m in upstate NY. Are you downstate where there are more restrictive tests?

I’m in Staten Island but he state inspection is just a plug in. Not a safety. With the range plugged in it never let my computer run its monitor tests. So I had to drive it 2 weeks with out it plugged in. That’s all.
Posted
40 minutes ago, Bonjosco3ss said:


I’m in Staten Island but he state inspection is just a plug in. Not a safety. With the range plugged in it never let my computer run its monitor tests. So I had to drive it 2 weeks with out it plugged in. That’s all.

Hmm. I’m due an inspection in two weeks.  I wonder if I should do the same? Has anyone else in NY run into the same issue?

 

Posted
On 5/7/2019 at 2:25 PM, Sierra Dan said:

True AFM disabling/deletion is possible.

The Kit is around $750 plus labor. This is a permanent solution

 

On 5/10/2019 at 1:30 PM, paracutin said:

$750 for the cam and lifters and another $750 for a tune.  Getting quite expensive. And it completely voids any type of power train warranty.

All you need is a tuner that will turn off the AFM.  You don't need any aftermarket parts, it's simply a software issue.  BlackBear can do this with one of their custom tunes or you can just buy something like a Diablo tuner for $300 and turn it off yourself.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...