Jump to content

Should I Go Diesel?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm on the fence between buying a 2019 2500 Duramax vs. the 6.0.  Honestly, I don't need the 6.6 Duramax, but the price is under $60k for a Denali...just $59k and change.  Seems like a great deal.  There is the same truck available for about $6k less.  Even though I don't necessarily need the diesel, I wonder if I am money ahead in the long run buying it, in terms of resale value.

 

In case you're wondering, the reason I say I don't "need" the diesel is that I rarely tow, mainly I need the payload which is higher on gas trucks.

 

Curious what you guys think.

Posted

Depends how you drive. Long trips, diesel is better. Short trips, lots of stop and go, get the gas.

Posted
10 minutes ago, avalonandl said:

Depends how you drive. Long trips, diesel is better. Short trips, lots of stop and go, get the gas.

This pretty much hits the nail on the head.

 

The exception being if you prefer the way the diesel drives.

Some thing about how it 'pulls/accelerates' without fuss and without downshifting (usually) is different to the gassers. 

 

Things changed around here (I need neither the payload nor tow rating of an HD) and I tried to give up the 6.6's, but wasn't happy with either of the v-8's in the 1500's, so I'm back with an HD and the 6.6. 

 

You're very close to being able to get a 2020 with the new 6.6L gasser if that does anything for you. 

LT8 -  Direct Injection and Variable Valve Timing, gasoline, (401 hp [299 kW] @ 5200 rpm, 464 lb-ft of torque [629 N-m] @ 4000 rpm)

 

 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, redwngr said:

You're very close to being able to get a 2020 with the new 6.6L gasser if that does anything for you.

It does indeed, and I thought about it, but I don't know that I want the first model year of that engine.  Plus the deals on the 2019 are pretty good right now, being the end of this model.  The 6.0 Vortec has been pretty much bullet proof.  A little under-powered yes, I've had two of them, so I know them pretty well.  But a damn solid engine.  I just am toying with the diesel given the relatively small price gap.

Posted

My only downfall with the diesel in the 2500 is payload loss. Have to move up to a 3500 to get payload back. Sometimes i wish i got the diesel but i hit a red light every 100 ft and my longest daily drive is about 10 miles. Not practical for my application.

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Posted

Depending on how long you keep it and how many miles you drive it's going to take you a long time to recoup the extra money spent for the diesel that you don't need.  That's just on fuel prices.  Then you have to include all the extra maintenance that the duramax needs vs the 6.0.  Filters, more oil, and def to name a few.  Plus if you keep it long enough for it to go out of warranty how much all the emissions garbage costs to repair/replace.  Even though you may get more for it when it comes time to sell, you probably already paid that difference in maintenance and fuel costs vs a gasser.  Having said that I DD a LMM so what do I know, I did inherit it so that's probably why.  I'm waiting to see what the new gasser is going to be like and if it'll be enough for me to give up my LMM for.

Posted
1 hour ago, Chevyguy85 said:

Depending on how long you keep it and how many miles you drive it's going to take you a long time to recoup the extra money spent for the diesel that you don't need.  That's just on fuel prices.  Then you have to include all the extra maintenance that the duramax needs vs the 6.0.  Filters, more oil, and def to name a few.  Plus if you keep it long enough for it to go out of warranty how much all the emissions garbage costs to repair/replace.  Even though you may get more for it when it comes time to sell, you probably already paid that difference in maintenance and fuel costs vs a gasser.  Having said that I DD a LMM so what do I know, I did inherit it so that's probably why.  I'm waiting to see what the new gasser is going to be like and if it'll be enough for me to give up my LMM for.

Solid points, thanks!

Posted

Pulled the trigger on a 2019 Sierra 2500 CC Denali 6.0.  Very happy, beautiful truck.  Now, do I level out the rake or not?  Decisions!!

Posted
8 hours ago, Riggin’ said:

Pulled the trigger on a 2019 Sierra 2500 CC Denali 6.0.  Very happy, beautiful truck.  Now, do I level out the rake or not?  Decisions!!

Lift that bad boy.

Posted
On 5/27/2019 at 1:00 PM, Riggin’ said:

Pulled the trigger on a 2019 Sierra 2500 CC Denali 6.0.  Very happy, beautiful truck.  Now, do I level out the rake or not?  Decisions!!

Pics or it never happened.  Congrats on your alleged purchase!  I'll probably be the outlier but I always leave my pickups stock height.  To each their own.

Posted
1 hour ago, Chevyguy85 said:

Pics or it never happened.  Congrats on your alleged purchase!  I'll probably be the outlier but I always leave my pickups stock height.  To each their own.

Ditto. leave it alone. Drive it and have fun.

Posted
On 5/20/2019 at 10:10 PM, Chevyguy85 said:

Plus if you keep it long enough for it to go out of warranty how much all the emissions garbage costs to repair/replace. 

 

Thow that stuff in the garbage!  LOL

Posted

Maybe just level slightly? I cranked torsion bars for about 1" of lift - still has rake, just not quite as steep.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,791
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    d.lowrey
    Newest Member
    d.lowrey
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 3,800 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Just did an injector/HPFP replacement on Pepper at 192,400 miles; close enough to 200K, RIGHT? (If 200K is considered life end and to me it isn't). But hey, to each his own.    Have never run a catch can on this vehicle. Back side of every valve looked like a new valve spray painted semigloss black. Port walls looked 'neat' (all a normal result of passive EGR via VVT) Zero build up even in AFM cylinders. Just color. It uses no measurable oil and never has.    At 155,000 I put her on E-85 and a borescope of the cylinders at plug change showed very clean pistons and valve faces. The replaced injector tips looked new. (It was the pump piston seal that was leaking). Oh well, have six good backups.    Still gets 28 mpg on gas (highway average) and over 20 (highway) on alky. UOA's look good and runs as good now as it did when I bought it. Better in fact.    What improvement would a Catch Can provide this motor?     And given all this I expect that IF I installed one I'd see some water/gas/oil vapor accumulation. Byproducts of normal combustion.   Having said that, IF my motor used an appreciable amount of oil I'd consider it a useful 'crutch' until I had the situation corrected OR if bore polished, until I junked it or rebuilt it to stave off repeated plug fouling.    I'm not telling you what I THINK. But what its DONE.          
    • Love the look. I'm a SCSB lover myself.    Two items. 1.) A spacer changes scrub radius but this also changes when we use wheels of different offsets. A little isn't a big deal. 2.) Steel wheels, alloy wheels all have different thickness. Same effect on the stud and lug nut as a spacer. When hub centric the wheel isn't supported by the stud. It's supported by the hub. The stud just keeps it all together.  
    • I had a evap sol go bad a couple weeks ago. . I replaced it.  While watching live data at the time I saw I had some cylinder 1 misfires. No MIL but on live data I could see ~50 at startup and about 70 more after an hour a drive all on cyl 1.  I also noticed that the LTFT were -5% to -15% always.  And that bank 2 is always -3% richer than bank 1. Even across all driving modes, city, highway, etc it’s always 3% richer than bank 1. So I start with the misfire. Swapped coil, plug, and plug wires from 1 to 3. No follow. I got an Injector reseal kit, pulled the D/s injector rail, swapped #1 and #3 injectors, resealed them, reinstalled and retested.  The misfire followed to 3. So I ordered and replaced all 8 injectors, spark plugs, and plug wires. Also replaced the 1 time use fuel pipes under the intake manifold.  Injectors that were in the truck since new were  Part # 12668390.  I replaced them with # 12742701 Got from RockAuto. Pretty certain they’re genuine and the correct ones. I called a friend at a parts store who told me “the 12742701 were the correct superseded part # for the originals I was replacing”. So started truck after replacing all that and it’s running -15 - -30 LTFTs. I reset the fuel trims with GDS2 and drove it for a 60 miles trip each way. There have been no changes in the LTFTs.  I checked if the HPFP was leaking into the crankcase. I removed the pvc and watched the trims. No difference.  I checked the alcohol content and it was at 10%  I’m out of ideas here. Truck seems to run great. Just always rich on the fuel trims.  Anyone with any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.  I ran an injector balance test just for the heck of it and it came back this. I’m confused.  I have gds2 and some other diag tools if anyone knows of anything I should test next.
    • Definitely needs to go back to the dealer. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...