Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2/23/2020 at 11:41 AM, truckguy82 said:

You are wrong about the lever effect.

 

Think about bicycle disc brakes vs Traditional cantilever brakes. The disc brakes are all the way center and work even better

If I am wrong about the lever effect we should prbably throw out 50% of all mechanical engineering ever done... and your won't need breaker bars to lossen stuck bolts anymore... that little 4" ratchet handle they sell at Murry's will be fine.

 

They work better because the hydraulic system produces much higher force of the pads on the rotor than the rim brakes... there are material differences as well.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 2/22/2020 at 4:42 PM, truckmann said:

Yes. Direct replacement with the caveat of either wheel spacers or some grinding on the calipers for the OEM wheels to fit. So far I'm really happy I did it. 

I have a 19 Suburban... Has the same brakes as the pre '19 trucks. Looks like TONS of wheel clearance and my 18" wheels look just like the 18" wheels on 19/20 trucks... Wonder if I will have no issues cause the wheels are the same Truck -> Suburban

 

Posted



The most important thing is not to get them really hot when they are new.
 


Can you add a little detail about why this is, or the effect of them getting hit when new or not?

Not trying to disagree or anything, I just find stuff like this interesting and would like to know more.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 2/22/2020 at 3:42 PM, truckmann said:

Yes. Direct replacement with the caveat of either wheel spacers or some grinding on the calipers for the OEM wheels to fit. So far I'm really happy I did it. 

 

So there is grinding needed even with the OEM 20" All terrain wheels?

 

do the 19+ calipers bolt right onto the current brackets and spindles or do the brackets need to be changed as well? Are the original brake lines reused or are those new as well?

Posted

This type of caliper won't use a bracket, it will mount directly to the spindle, which seems to be a direct fit, you just need to shim the caliper so that it sits centered on the rotor.

I'm not sure if the stock brake lines will work or not, but it would be a perfect time to upgrade to a set of stainless lines anyway.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
22 minutes ago, TJay74 said:

 

So there is grinding needed even with the OEM 20" All terrain wheels?

 

do the 19+ calipers bolt right onto the current brackets and spindles or do the brackets need to be changed as well? Are the original brake lines reused or are those new as well?

It would be a guess but I would assume some grinding on the outer hump of the caliper or a spacer will be needed with most OEM wheels before 2019. The new calipers bolt right to the existing spindles. The existing hoses can be used, but I chose to upgrade to SS braided. 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

running anything larger than 18" rims on these trucks will def inhibit braking distance, i doubt 18's fit this kit...

 

would be interesting if someone offered a Hydroboost conversion for the 1500 trucks to get rid of the extraineous vacuum pump system.  

Posted
54 minutes ago, flyingfool said:

running anything larger than 18" rims on these trucks will def inhibit braking distance, i doubt 18's fit this kit...

 

would be interesting if someone offered a Hydroboost conversion for the 1500 trucks to get rid of the extraineous vacuum pump system.  

18" will fit as far as being big enough diameter to clear the caliper. The 19/20's still have an 18" wheel option. 

 

Hydroboost is awesome. I did that conversion on my 2003 along with the bigger brakes from the 14-18 trucks. Honestly though I don't think I would bother with it on my 14 with how it feels now after upgrading to the 19+ front brakes. I have considered ditching the vacuum pump if there was a good place to tap into the engine vacuum. I have V4 mode tuned out so I think the engine vacuum would be sufficient from what I've read. 

Posted
18" will fit as far as being big enough diameter to clear the caliper. The 19/20's still have an 18" wheel option. 
 
Hydroboost is awesome. I did that conversion on my 2003 along with the bigger brakes from the 14-18 trucks. Honestly though I don't think I would bother with it on my 14 with how it feels now after upgrading to the 19+ front brakes. I have considered ditching the vacuum pump if there was a good place to tap into the engine vacuum. I have V4 mode tuned out so I think the engine vacuum would be sufficient from what I've read. 
Just tap into the pcv line on the side of the intake, easy place to tap into then just run a vented catch can out of the valley.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
57 minutes ago, lovelessjl said:

Just tap into the pcv line on the side of the intake, easy place to tap into then just run a vented catch can out of the valley.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 

I'll have to look into it closer. I have a Mighty Mouse catch can on it now. 

 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, lovelessjl said:

I've seen that one. The issue for me is still being able to use the catch can since it uses those ports. 

 

 

Posted

You could find a breather filter and put that in place of the return line, or switch to a vented catch can like the moroso version. I'd be curious how much vacuum that line holds while connected to the pcv system still.

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)
On 2/24/2020 at 1:46 PM, groovy_moon said:

If I am wrong about the lever effect we should prbably throw out 50% of all mechanical engineering ever done... and your won't need breaker bars to lossen stuck bolts anymore... that little 4" ratchet handle they sell at Murry's will be fine.

 

They work better because the hydraulic system produces much higher force of the pads on the rotor than the rim brakes... there are material differences as well.

Lol, ok

 

the lever effect exists, but it’s irrelevant. There is no net gain or loss of energy by using a larger disc and placing the pad on the outside. If you place a brake pad closer to the interior, you have to clamp harder, but that’s offset by the lack of rotational speed. Considering the clamping force is just a number you can pick out of a hat with an automotive braking system, it means there is no additional stopping power with larger brakes. Thus, it means the only point to having large rotors is heat absorption and dissipation. If you have to convert X joules of energy into heat and to be absorbed and dissipated by a chunk of metal, a big chunk of metal can do that more effectively.

 

In regards to bike hydraulics is just a means of energy transfer. When you pull the brake lever on the bike, you’re not going to suddenly get more clamping force because hydraulics = magic.

 

The only reason disc brakes works on a bike is because bike rims constantly bend a little bit and create a wobble. This means your brake pads need to be further away and need to travel more. With the disc brakes, they are going to stay true, which means you can reduce the amount of travel the pad has, which in turn allows you much greater mechanical advantage. When you pull the brake leaver, you pull it maybe 2 inches. 2 inches of hand travel moving the brake pad 3mm, is a whole lot more mechanical advantage than moving the pad 25mm you need for traditional brakes. You could get the same effect with hydraulics or mechanic advantage, it doesn’t matter. The hydraulic method is just a simpler way to transfer large amounts of energy and creates lighter components.

 

I mean, did you never wonder why every vehicle on the road has the braking power to lock up the brakes no problem, but for some reason sports cars have bigger brakes? Why the hell would they have bigger brakes if a honda civics brakes could easily lock up the tires.

 

heat dissipation is the only reason, not mechanical advantage

Edited by truckguy82
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
    • Lets see if I can sum up two pages of nothing useful.    You want to refute your own governments data of the "Purchasing Power" Index FOR THE ENTIRE USA and its territories replacing it with the experience of a single family and its business and label that reality?  Then pound on that for a week hoping it will find traction?    Stan, I've told you several times. I don't do irrational. There are more people in the USA than your family.    I'm pretty sure this tread is so blown up. I'll give you a few days or months if need be to post yourself silent then I'll see if I can find enough parts of the train to reassemble it. 
    • Facebook groups hate VSE, poor customer service; their responses to criticisms are pretty poor for a reputable company. I'm not a customer, haven't bought anything from them, but how they handle themselves on social media is a definite "No" for me. 
    • $10,000 for a transmission?   Pretty sure I could buy all the parts, tools, and education to rebuild it myself for a quarter of that amount.   or swap it out with a new one...
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...