Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 3/4/2020 at 7:11 AM, truckguy82 said:

Lol, ok

 

the lever effect exists, but it’s irrelevant. There is no net gain or loss of energy by using a larger disc and placing the pad on the outside. If you place a brake pad closer to the interior, you have to clamp harder, but that’s offset by the lack of rotational speed. Considering the clamping force is just a number you can pick out of a hat with an automotive braking system, it means there is no additional stopping power with larger brakes. Thus, it means the only point to having large rotors is heat absorption and dissipation. If you have to convert X joules of energy into heat and to be absorbed and dissipated by a chunk of metal, a big chunk of metal can do that more effectively.

 

In regards to bike hydraulics is just a means of energy transfer. When you pull the brake lever on the bike, you’re not going to suddenly get more clamping force because hydraulics = magic.

 

The only reason disc brakes works on a bike is because bike rims constantly bend a little bit and create a wobble. This means your brake pads need to be further away and need to travel more. With the disc brakes, they are going to stay true, which means you can reduce the amount of travel the pad has, which in turn allows you much greater mechanical advantage. When you pull the brake leaver, you pull it maybe 2 inches. 2 inches of hand travel moving the brake pad 3mm, is a whole lot more mechanical advantage than moving the pad 25mm you need for traditional brakes. You could get the same effect with hydraulics or mechanic advantage, it doesn’t matter. The hydraulic method is just a simpler way to transfer large amounts of energy and creates lighter components.

 

I mean, did you never wonder why every vehicle on the road has the braking power to lock up the brakes no problem, but for some reason sports cars have bigger brakes? Why the hell would they have bigger brakes if a honda civics brakes could easily lock up the tires.

 

heat dissipation is the only reason, not mechanical advantage

Thanks!!

i wonder how brake bias is being affected  when you guys are switching over to the larger calipers??

Posted
21 hours ago, flyingfool said:

Thanks!!

i wonder how brake bias is being affected  when you guys are switching over to the larger calipers??

I’m not sure. If the clamping force is increased by the caliper, and only on the front or the back, then yes it would be effected.

 

I really want to hear groovey moon, the “engineer” respond

Posted (edited)

I’m pretty sure these should clear even 17 inch wheels, for those of us the went down to 17 inch wheels since the spare tire on these new Gen trucks is still a 17 inch. It would just have to be a low offset wheel to clear the outboard portion of the caliper. Pics are of both types of spares on 2020 Sierras at a local dealer of mine. Can anyone confirm this to be true? I just need to clear my 17 wheel barrels, my wheels have a concave and zero offset to clear the caliper width..

E8B08E82-B2CC-40CF-9AE4-826477FA1A9F.jpeg

94C93BD0-E27C-470B-A7CF-14C5AC3D82F9.jpeg

Edited by Twinscroll240
  • Like 2
Posted

Any chance they'd let you mount a spare up to see how it fits? That 2nd one actually looks pretty good!

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Posted
On 1/31/2020 at 5:29 PM, truckmann said:

Here is what I ordered from Rock Auto and I got some Stop Tech SS brake lines number 950.66002 from ebay. 

The brake lines aren't really needed, but I figured since I was in there I may as well upgrade those too. The price of the brake pads was stupid, but they also came with a new pad life sensor which I didn't need. I'd bet you will be able to find pads cheaper before too long. 

 

image.png.daa1771477674fed367256eaf61b88b7.png

So I started at rock auto and neither they nor anyone else has the drivers side caliper.  It actually appears that a new part number is out for the calipers. I wonder what may have changed.  

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I don't know. Rock Auto looks to have them both available right now but there is a 2 day delay on the driver's side one.  The stock has been in and out on them for a while.  

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Could you get a measurement from the face of the rotor to the outermost protrusion of the caliper and the measurement of the wheel mounting surface to the same location on the caliper?  Might help us figure out if these will clear wheels before finding out we need spacers. Thanks. 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 3/28/2020 at 11:52 AM, tsdrumm said:

Could you get a measurement from the face of the rotor to the outermost protrusion of the caliper and the measurement of the wheel mounting surface to the same location on the caliper?  Might help us figure out if these will clear wheels before finding out we need spacers. Thanks. 

I'll try to get to it when I have time. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 4/10/2020 at 5:15 AM, Twinscroll240 said:

Please let us know on the measurements 

Hey Bud. Just got done doing the swap on my 2006 Z71. Here are the measurements roughly. 

 

Front face of rotor to outer edge of the caliper is 2-1/2" roughly.

 

From face of hub to outer edge of caliper is 1-1/2". If concerned about clearance add 1/16" to your figure.

 

I have 2015 Sierra 20" oem wheels on the truck. Tons of clearance with these.

 

 

20200426_113002_resized.jpg

20200426_112929_resized.jpg

20200426_122011_resized.jpg

20200426_122002_resized.jpg

Edited by AlljackedupZ71
  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Let's keep this thread going! Very interested. Just bought a '16 Silverado 1500 with 73,000 miles and it feels like it needs rotors, I've got a shimmy when it under hard braking. It'd be nice to spend a little extra and just upgrade the calipers too. 

Posted

In theory, your brakes should match your engine. Whatever energy your right foot creates, the brake pedal needs to be able to dissipate.
 

This being said, the 6.2 is considerable more powerful than the 5.3. And I think they use the same brakes. Which means oem should be just fine if you have a 5.3. 

Posted
7 hours ago, truckguy82 said:

In theory, your brakes should match your engine. Whatever energy your right foot creates, the brake pedal needs to be able to dissipate.
 

This being said, the 6.2 is considerable more powerful than the 5.3. And I think they use the same brakes. Which means oem should be just fine if you have a 5.3. 

Having a 6.2 I cannot say my brakes (in their current state) are confidence inspiring. I have an NBS silverado that I converted to hydroboost and it's pedal feel is fantastic. 

 

I'm going to flush my fluid this weekend and that should help my pedal a bit. I'd like to get more feedback on this topic though throwing money at my current setup. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,826
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Tonwantonga
    Newest Member
    Tonwantonga
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 829 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • What I think you're saying is there is supply here at home, and in Venezuela, and we could ease pricing if only it were favorable to do so.   Well, yes?   But that's not the current market. Supply isn't what could someday exist, if only, it's what producers are willing to produce and sell at a certain price point.   The national price of single family homes would come way down if we'd just slap together a few million homes this summer.   RAM and GPUs would get a lot cheaper if we just set up some factories to produce a bunch more and stopped using it to build out AI data centers.    
    • The turn signal/multifunction switch is faulty.  I've seen a few of these go bad at work.  
    • I am experiecing the same issue, I have gone in the setting and disabled rain sensing function but I am still experiencing this. Whe i use my turn signal they will redomly turn on. Sometime they stay on and others times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop. Its super anoying, escpecially after a fresh wash. Anyone have any advice? . rain-sensing function, but I am still experiencing this issue Sometimes they stay on, and other times we swipe 2 or 3 times and stop.It's super annoying, especially after a fresh wash.When I use my turn signal, they will randomly turn on. I am experiencing the same issue. I have gone into the settings and disabled the rain sensing function, but I am still experiencing this.
    • If we actually used any significant amount of that source in the USA then I'd agree but we don't. We've had that discussion before. We drill and pump more than we use. Thing is, we sell. We export. Gas and Crude. It's more profitable so any shortage here is self inflicted and LEGAL.    I worked a gas plant that has multiple fuel sources available and I worked in the furnace and boiler plant in that facility. I'd had days we swapped fuel types four times in a twelve hour shift which isn't done on supply but on margin. Two of the fuel sources are internally generated. Tail gas and DAK, both of which are sold as well a consumed. We always had more than we needed to run the process but we chose the fuel that produced the best margin not bought at the cheapest price always. A good bit of math to that and back in the time that was done on a slide rule.     I worked the Shale Oil Semiworks of Chevron Research and CONOCO Research in Salt Lake City. That process never went into production although it was very successful. Why? Did we lack oil bearing shale? Nope. Price of crude never made the margins work. That was in the late 70's early 80's. Remember history? What was happening then was a reaction to that situation. It didn't drive it. If so then it's easy. This isn't a supply and demand thing. This is a profit and margin thing and AI rules that now.    In no refining situation that I was ever in would a bomb hitting a well anywhere in the world 'instantly' interrupt or even distress the supply. Most plants have more than a months worth of crude in the tank field and more in pumping stations. That yo-yo could play out over days, weeks and maybe months and have zero impact on plant operations. How many times has this been off and on in the last few months? These people and not stupid. These plants measure down time in hundreds of thousands of dollars per day. They are not sucking fumes or waiting on the next truckload with baited breath. Besides, as I noted, they are for the most part 'vertically integrated'. They own it from the dirt is sits in to the delivery rack and sometimes to the pump. It has a HUGE shock absorber built in. When production suffers, refining wins and when refining is winning exploration is killing. The rest of that crap in the news is a 'news cycle'. Government dipping in to reserves? Oil is stealing their milk money. There's a reason Chevron abandon Venezuela infrastructure and it had nothing to do with security of US citizens. Nationals run those plants. it has to do with MARGINS disappearing to corruption. They are in no hurry to return. Is there supply there? Oh yea. More than enough to offset what is bought in the middle east. Just isn't ???? Profitable.    We have supply. There are places in Illinois you can drive a pipe into the ground and run your homes natural gas furnace on it.    A refinery fire will gum up the supply works but not a localized war where the market is using a limited supply from. Now Europe, that's something other....
    • $4.00 a gallon here now.   Diesel nearly $5.00 again.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...