Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was doing some random browsing and it landed me unto Dynamat and sound deadening in general. It got me thinking that maybe it could be the solution to some minor issues I’m experiencing. The T1 is already a very quiet vehicle but some minor issues I can think of that this could fix:

 

1.       Door and interior rattles from Bose speakers. I know a few here find this annoying, me included.

2.       Road noise reduction. Houston has a lot of concrete roads and they are much louder than asphalt.

3.       Exhaust drone or intrusion, big or small.

4.       Any general noises from the truck that don’t necessarily need “repair” but you would rather not hear them e.g: 6.2 squeaks, axle jingling, etc.

 

I am considering it as a last resort if some minor noises that I’m experiencing can’t be identified and fixed by the dealer. Dynamat is sort of expensive but looks like there are cheaper alternatives that are equally as good.

 

Anyways, I did a search and couldn’t find any references to sound deadening on the T1. Anyone done this or considered doing this? Please spare me “it’s a truck” comments ?.

Posted

Door panels are on the list for me this spring. Plan is to pull off the white sound deadening pad, dynamat most of back of the door panel, put the white pad back on and see what that does. Also bought a roll of felt tape to *maybe* put on some of the mating surfaces of the door panel and trim. Still uncertain where that will come into play having not had it apart yet. 
 

The rattle on mine seems contained to the armrest, and the area of fake leather above it. It really drives me nuts on certain songs and it’s a shame because the stereo otherwise sounds pretty good to me. My thoughts on doing the panel instead of the door is to hopefully block some of the resonance and “stabilize“ the panel.
 

Looking at the backside, there seems to be room for improvement on the factory deadening.

 

C1D42448-600F-4618-A996-96723ADE9706.thumb.jpeg.c4e02655790bae52d2e661081fd61d01.jpeg

 

The rest of the truck...to me...seems past the point of diminishing returns on dynamat-ing. 

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

Door panels are on the list for me this spring. Plan is to pull off the white sound deadening pad, dynamat most of back of the door panel, put the white pad back on and see what that does. Also bought a roll of felt tape to *maybe* put on some of the mating surfaces of the door panel and trim. Still uncertain where that will come into play having not had it apart yet. 
 

The rattle on mine seems contained to the armrest, and the area of fake leather above it. It really drives me nuts on certain songs and it’s a shame because the stereo otherwise sounds pretty good to me. My thoughts on doing the panel instead of the door is to hopefully block some of the resonance and “stabilize“ the panel.
 

Looking at the backside, there seems to be room for improvement on the factory deadening.

 

C1D42448-600F-4618-A996-96723ADE9706.thumb.jpeg.c4e02655790bae52d2e661081fd61d01.jpeg

 

The rest of the truck...to me...seems past the point of diminishing returns on dynamat-ing. 

Looks like you are much farther along this path than me. Like you, I'm maybe part of the few that actually likes the sound of the Bose system but the occasional rattles with some songs can get annoying. I thought the oem kicker sub upgrade would solve it but it didn't (sounds good though). 

 

Most of the research i have done so far suggest doing the doors and floor. I will also most likely just start with the doors, see the effect and decide where to go from there.

 

You might not need to do the whole back side of the door. One of the videos i watched, i think the guy just applied a small piece behind the speaker. He did the "knock test" and it was quite impressive the difference from just a small piece. 

 

Dynamat Door Install Video

  • Like 1
Posted

Had some down time today and did the driver’s side...holy cow...what a difference! I seriously picked up so much bass I turned it down from 10 on the EQ to 6...it was too much on Hits 1 station! Rattling is about 90% gone, nothing like before. And the door closes with more of a thud too!

 

Pulling the panel off, I noticed the door is actually surprisingly well dampened. There are a few side impact bars that run through the door and the door skin is foamed onto the bars. Everything felt really tight and made a solid thud when I tapped it, not tinny sounding. 
 

The main shortcoming I noticed was the vapor barrier. It’s an “acoustic“ type foam, but it was adhered very loosely and is thinly constructed. Tapping the speaker cone induced some rattles because the center of the barrier was not glued to the support bars going across the opening in the door. This would most definitely make some noise and kill some bass.

 

Somewhat of a plan in hand, I started sticking Dynamat on the back of the door panel for starters, focusing on the armrest area that rattled a lot on mine. But also put strips anywhere that sounded plasticy when I tapped it. All told, added about 1 pound of Dynamat to the panel. To wrap it up, I removed all of the push pin clips that hold the panel to the door. I put a small piece of Tesa tape where the clip slides in, slit it, and put the clip back. That takes up any slack in between the clip and the panel. Then I put the factory white pillow sound deadener back over top and the panel was done.

 

129AB36F-B4D7-4D14-8494-40F9717266E9.thumb.jpeg.8b68f9240056e1ee077b57098cf902bd.jpegF770BFA9-E950-42DD-86CE-2BB1AA17BDFC.thumb.jpeg.920a1ebc265a522ad3f4239dca5df840.jpeg61CB95E4-B0E9-4C95-8625-5E653987E7C2.thumb.jpeg.c3a6492aac5c3ff81325eec44a1472c8.jpeg

 

On the door itself, I pulled the speaker, put some Dynamat behind it and some behind the vapor barrier. Didn’t go overboard because I have a limited amount of Dynamat, and didn’t feel like it needed much. Wrapped the clip and tongue of the speaker module in Tesa tape and threw it back in. 

 

Next, I glued the vapor barrier correctly (paying attention to the braces that weren’t glued to it before). Then I just put Dynamat over the barrier to beef it up. I didn’t overlap to the door, so the vapor barrier can be removed for service as easy as if it were factory stock. I forgot to take pics but still have one door to go. I am betting this made the biggest difference. Now, I know a pro would ditch the barrier and go over the whole door, but that was not practical for me to do, especially if the window motor craps out! After slapping the Dynamat on, the barrier sounded like wood when you tap it, so I think it’s doing the job great now! Very sturdy.

 

To re-assemble, I snapped the door panel back on carefully. I also applied Tesa tape around all of the clips holding the fake wood trim piece on, as well as a few wraps where it’s tongue slides into the arm rest. All told, took about an hour and a half, just putzing around and engineering things as I went.

 

This is my materials list thus far. Fabric tape:

 

Tesa 51608, 25m x 19mm adhesive wiring cloth tape original ISOBAND 3 pcs pack https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00XPDVER2/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apip_wT2o1Qb52Dd1E


Tape for vapor barrier:

 

Yunpo Butyl Sealant Tape 4M/13Ft Waterproof Butyl Rubber Sealant for Car Headlamps Window Door Windshield Butyl Tape Black https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PRXRF9D/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_pvdzEb56GKEMZ

 

Dynamat:
 

Dynamat 10435 12" x 36" x 0.067" Thick Self-Adhesive Sound Deadener with Xtreme Door Kit https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00020CAUG/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_1XdzEbSRG0BRQ

 

Not listed are trim removal tools, 7mm socket, wife’s wallpaper roller, etc.


Overall, bang for the buck here is just awesome. I was really, really surprised.

  • Like 2
Posted

That's awesome man. Great minds think alike ?. Got a kit myself over the week. Went with Kilmat. Also have my Zoom H4n and dB Meter to do some pre and post measurements. I was planning to start the install this weekend but will probably start next week. I instead did some pre measurements today using Zoom H4n and the dB Meter so i'll have something to compare to once done. 

 

I'm really glad you are liking the improvements. I had no doubt there would be improvements after deadening the doors. I'm reconsidering doing the inner-door layer or doing too much because of potential future PDRs. I did at least get one thing deadened today though. These 2 screw covers go over the front passenger side grab handle. I had to remove them when routing my dashcam wiring and they have been rattling ever since. Today i stuck 2 kilmat stickers on the backside of both of them and the rattling has been eliminated. I'm really looking forward to doing the doors and other areas. 

 

kit.jpg

screw_covers.jpg

Posted

That’s great you are going to measure the difference...will be nice to see it on paper.
 

Think you’ll be just fine putting minimal, if any material on the door skin. I guess I pictured that the door would be flimsy, rattle-y aluminum but that’s just not the case. It’s all very sturdy feeling on the skin side. And then the inner door has a lot of rolled edges, dimples, ribs, etc. I really think the main thing letting it down was the vapor barrier flapping in the breeze down there. 

Posted

That's good to know, will keep that in mind when i take the door apart. I will be deadening the floors a little bit, just one rectangular mat under each passenger. When the kicker sub really gets going, i can feel the vibrations through the floor. Hoping deadening the floors should reduce it a little bit. Any reduction in road noise that comes from that will be a side benefit. 

 

I don't expect to measure much difference before and after but if i feel like i'm hearing a difference, i would rather it not just be a placebo effect. We will see how it goes. 

Posted
8 hours ago, truck_newbie said:

That's good to know, will keep that in mind when i take the door apart. I will be deadening the floors a little bit, just one rectangular mat under each passenger. When the kicker sub really gets going, i can feel the vibrations through the floor. Hoping deadening the floors should reduce it a little bit. Any reduction in road noise that comes from that will be a side benefit. 

 

I don't expect to measure much difference before and after but if i feel like i'm hearing a difference, i would rather it not just be a placebo effect. We will see how it goes. 

Yeah, I’m mainly happy to have gotten rid of the buzzing door panel, but you may be surprised at the overall result. I know I am.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Finally got around to doing this. Installed some deadening over the weekend. Did front doors and a bit of the floors. Only left with the rear doors, will do that later.

 

Disclaimer: I make no claims of being an expert on this. Audio engineering tends to have a lot of controversial topics so I’ll try not to step on any landmine.

 

TL;DR -> You should do this. Best way I can describe the improvement is the sound system sounds very clean. It’s actually a little bit weird. I can really crank it up with no rattling or resonance from the doors and the bass sounds very tight and less boomy. You don’t have to do any measurements like I did, just stick away and enjoy. Keep wanting to go out for a drive it so I can listen to it?.

 

@OnTheReel, good tip on the fabric tape, definitely made the clips tighter. Didn’t end up using the butyl tape though, the vapor shield on mine was still sticky for re-application.

 

Summary

1.       I took measurements before and after with the UMIK-1 and REW software. I didn’t do any tweaks to the system. Just wanted to see before and after performance from installing the mats. Will probably tweak and dial the system in later.

measurement_setup.thumb.jpg.6997ac6d399e8d8d66162591af92e31a.jpg

 

2.       Frequency response didn’t show much variation pre and post install.

a.       I didn’t see any improvement in the mids which was a little disappointing. Nevertheless, resonance improvement won’t show up in frequency response anyways.

b.       Freq response results tells me my system is unbalanced and that I like a lot of bass ?. Don’t judge. I actually found that a little surprising as the kicker knob is only halfway and my settings are bass=2, mid=4, treble=4.

freq_response.thumb.jpg.d79c8abf2c1252a51bc30526d6d7ba23.jpg

 

3.       Spectrogram measurements show that post install, the bass decays faster. You can see in the pre-install that the bass has some decent magnitudes even past 600ms. Much tighter now.

pre_spectrogram.thumb.jpg.fc82de53fac312d81be89b8ce2262d4d.jpg

post_spectrogram.thumb.jpg.d3ef09eaea7f3839f429b80a68a09f83.jpg

 

4.       Material is not expensive and it’s very easy to apply.

a.       The doors are not hard to take apart. Some of the clips are stubborn but they should come off with a little persuasion.

b.       I’m not sure how much improvement came from doing the floors but they are the easiest to apply. You just lift the carpet and roll it on. It definitely killed some of the Kicker sub vibrations that travel through the floor. I think it’s maybe a tad quieter now but I haven’t measured the noise SPL post install so can’t say for sure. Will measure it later. 

 

5.       Knock test didn’t disappoint and the door has a much more solid thunk to it when closing.

 

6.       Surprisingly there is actually some factory applied sound deadening. I have highlighted it below. There is a deadening mat that goes across the top section of each of the front doors applied from factory. Who would have guessed.

factory_deadening.thumb.jpg.c7e6a433d0beef7113f1baeb13248bd6.jpg

 

Install Pics

front_left_around_speaker.thumb.jpg.080b156c17872fc07e506ea3c8863aa8.jpg

front_left_behind_speaker.thumb.jpg.e91bac716528582cb8c365bb80b6d9b1.jpg

front_left_floor.thumb.jpg.80be6b1f7feb893fd14859a204d8099c.jpg

front_right_behind_speaker.thumb.jpg.a1167fd1401d0cf1ff4d6550e64cb62a.jpg

 

I applied a bunch deadening behind the white material below. Didn't remove it, just lifted and applied. 

front_right_door_cover.thumb.jpg.c08eaa3b8bcb5b58c3c36c2689046747.jpg

front_right_floor.thumb.jpg.10af240d99c2ea5fab44f635854fa3c9.jpg

rear_right_floor.thumb.jpg.e3f5ada4c0e051f9d0d57d983d2a7ac1.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted

Nice work and nice testing. Definitely plan to do some of my floor once things warm up.

Posted
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

Nice work and nice testing. Definitely plan to do some of my floor once things warm up.

Thanks. Applying to the floors were much easier than I had imagined. 

Posted
3 hours ago, chadman said:

Evaporator core tape is a great product for fixing rattles and rub points. 

Had no idea what that was lol, had to google it. Looks interesting. 

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Great info, guys! I’m thinking about doing the floors and behind the back seat for road noise. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...