Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Anyone know if this will swap over to our 6 speed trucks? I noticed the Camaro SS with the 6L80 comes with a drain plug ,and is said to be larger capacity than the stock Camaro, 

 

ACDelco 24250062 - trans pan for Camaro SS 6L80

 

please correct me if I'm wrong..

 

https://www.gmpartsonline.net/oem-parts/gm-pan-24297104

price is right

Edited by flyingfool
Posted

stumbled across some info,  the camaro pan is part of the fluid level check procedure , its comes with a drain plug but there is also a stand pipe  built into it. since the car has no dip stick. , this still may be a good option for some.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Did anyone ever confirm if this would work for our 6 speed trucks?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • 1 month later...
Posted

Bringing this back up, would be a great option to add a drain plug if this works with the tucks without causing issues.

Posted
On 4/22/2020 at 10:16 AM, MrWeller said:

Did anyone ever confirm if this would work for our 6 speed trucks?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ya we want to know before the secret is out and they cost $250

  • Like 2
Posted

For $25 it might be worth it to just give it a try and see if it fits.

  • Like 1
Posted

I googled that part number from above and on Summit's webpage it says it fits 19 and 20 Silverado's with the 6 speed. No mention of previous years Silverado.

Posted
On 3/3/2020 at 12:26 AM, flyingfool said:

Anyone know if this will swap over to our 6 speed trucks? I noticed the Camaro SS with the 6L80 comes with a drain plug ,and is said to be larger capacity than the stock Camaro, 

 

ACDelco 24250062 - trans pan for Camaro SS 6L80

 

please correct me if I'm wrong..

 

https://www.gmpartsonline.net/oem-parts/gm-pan-24297104

price is right

I mean if we are shopping gen iv powertrain parts, might as well look into anything with a 6l80.

 

vette had em, so did numerous trucks

Posted
2 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

How much does the Camaro pan hold?

there is a standard pan and the ss pan i think the specs are on GM parts site for capacities.. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Did anyone get one ordered up and try it to see if it fits?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

havent had time to do it yet,  i'm only at 38k miles, i'll pull the pan and order it when i get close to 50k miles

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I ordered part #24297104 from RockAuto for $21.79 so I figured I would check it out. I'll keep you posted when I get to work on it...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Posted

Alright guys, my order from RockAuto showed up this morning. I ordered a new transmission filter, plus the oem transmission pan and acdelco pan #24297104 which fits the Camaro SD and has the factory drain plug.

Upon unboxing them both, they are identical except for the drain plug and the numbers stamped into them. The only thing that makes me wonder about fitting our trucks, is the stand pipe on the inside of the drain plug. It sticks up quite a bit from the bottom of the pan. I'll attach a few pics of the Camaro SS pan so you can see what I'm concerned with. I don't know if this would create any clearance issues or not when installing on our trucks. I haven't done my pan drop yet to see if first hand. 3777ffe33bb426678e781cac5ce5970f.jpg
073e2862fa27404c9d407c15f5d79cc4.jpg
ea31a448be19bff900644f769a2157c0.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,758
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Randy Ginoza
    Newest Member
    Randy Ginoza
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,769 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...