Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why Did The Chicken Cross The Road?

 

DONALD TRUMP: I've been told by my many sources, good sources - they're very good sources - that the chicken crossed the road. All the Fake News wants to do is write nasty things about the road, but it's a really good road. It's a beautiful road. Everyone knows how beautiful it is.

 

JOE BIDEN: Why did the chicken do the...thing in the...you know the rest.

 

SARAH PALIN: The chicken crossed the road because, gosh-darn it, he's a maverick!

 

BARACK OBAMA: Let me be perfectly clear, if the chickens like their eggs they can keep their eggs. No chicken will be required to cross the road to surrender her eggs. Period.

 

AOC: Chickens should not be forced to lay eggs! This is because of corporate greed! Eggs should be able to lay themselves.

 

HILLARY CLINTON: What difference at this point does it make why the chicken crossed the road.

 

GEORGE W. BUSH: We don't really care why the chicken crossed the road. We just want to know if the chicken is on our side of the road or not. The chicken is either with us or against us. There is no middle ground here.

 

DICK CHENEY: Where's my gun?

 

BILL CLINTON: I did not cross the road with that chicken.

 

AL GORE: I invented the chicken.

 

JOHN KERRY: Although I voted to let the chicken cross the road, I am now against it! It was the wrong road to cross, and I was misled about the chicken's intentions. I am not for it now, and will remain against it.

 

AL SHARPTON: Why are all the chickens white?

 

DR. PHIL: The problem we have here is that this chicken won't realize that he must first deal with the problem on this side of the road before it goes after the problem on the other side of the road. What we need to do is help him realize how stupid he is acting by not taking on his current problems before adding any new problems.

 

ANDERSON COOPER: We have reason to believe there is a chicken, but we have not yet been allowed to have access to the other side of the road.

 

NANCY GRACE: That chicken crossed the road because he's guilty! You can see it in his eyes and the way he walks.

 

PAT BUCHANAN: To steal the job of a decent, hardworking American.

 

DR SEUSS: Did the chicken cross the road? Did he cross it with a toad? Yes, the chicken crossed the road, but why it crossed I've not been told.

 

ERNEST HEMINGWAY: To die in the rain, alone.

 

GRANDPA: In my day we didn't ask why the chicken crossed the road. Somebody told us the chicken crossed the road, and that was good enough for us.

 

ARISTOTLE: It is the nature of chickens to cross the road.

 

ALBERT EINSTEIN: Did the chicken really cross the road, or did the road move beneath the chicken?

 

COLONEL SANDERS: Did I miss one?

  • Like 2
Posted
Ok Grumps, that was the most entertaining part of the 179 pages so far!!! Keep up the good work.

There wasn’t a chicken. The chicken is watching fake news and is afraid of the chicken bug. So the chicken is staying home. The chicken is a young chicken with no real cause of concern. The chicken doesn’t know that though because of chicken fear. Because a she’s a chicken. Unfortunately the chicken doesn’t have common sense. There’s lots of chickens like this chicken. Unfortunately the chicken doesn’t need to cross the road. There’s no more jobs for the chicken. Don’t be a chicken.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
Now they’re trying to say she was set up by the salon. Absolutely delusional. And what’s even scarier is people will back her
9c19eb4cbf25c999085c25a5c50e3c3d.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


6a7e404977766081da7a6e513951b594.jpg


Ryan B.
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 hours ago, mikemcclain8 said:

Ok Grumps, that was the most entertaining part of the 179 pages so far!!! Keep up the good work.

Spin spin spin....it's all spin Mike. 

Button button whose got the button.

Ever play that? They are with the truth. 

They being all of they

Posted
1 hour ago, RyanbabZ71 said:

Now they’re trying to say she was set up by the salon.

Well.............was she? PROOF either way is good. Conjecture is not.

?

 

How is this useful?

Posted

How could she possibly be set up? What, did they chloroform her, drag her into the salon, pull her mask off and give her a hairdo?!?
 

No matter what, she was breaking rules she herself has been forcing down everyone else’s throats. She knew it and didn’t care, just like all the rest of ‘em. I think like 25% of the posts in this thread are stories of hypocritical Democrats, why be surprised when she’s another...

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, OnTheReel said:

How could she possibly be set up? What, did they chloroform her, drag her into the salon, pull her mask off and give her a hairdo?!?
 

No matter what, she was breaking rules she herself has been forcing down everyone else’s throats. She knew it and didn’t care, just like all the rest of ‘em. I think like 25% of the posts in this thread are stories of hypocritical Democrats, why be surprised when she’s another...

Lol i get a good laugh at anyone making excuses for her, she controls this city but yet acts surprised by her own dracona rules and regulations crippling it currently.

 

Her telling the press after they asked her if she owes an apology to the people and more specifically the business owners of her city shut down by her stupidity, she said without hesitation " NO I DON'T"!  Pretty much says it all, not only that she decided while her fake teeth are falling out of her mouth as she tries to speak saying that in fact she feels the salon owner owes her an apology lol.....

 

These leftist people are really something else, she truly lives in her own little world.

  • Like 3
Posted

Yeah, and of course the mob is following along. Making threats, leaving bad reviews. Kids that hate old, white rich people doing the dirty work of a 116 year old white millionaire. Go figure.


You can almost guarantee this hair stylist from San Fran is a liberal. Unfortunately she’s learning a hard lesson about how her people really operate. Once you get fed up with their hypocrisy and stand up for something, you are done. 

  • Like 3
Posted
Yeah, and of course the mob is following along. Making threats, leaving bad reviews. Kids that hate old, white rich people doing the dirty work of a 116 year old white millionaire. Go figure.

You can almost guarantee this hair stylist from San Fran is a liberal. Unfortunately she’s learning a hard lesson about how her people really operate. Once you get fed up with their hypocrisy and stand up for something, you are done. 

Seriously. I don’t know what else it’s going to take for people to wake up. Orange man bad syndrome must be incurable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2
Posted

I always laugh when I hear someone from the left say “Orangeman”. Isn’t that Judging by color(racist)? Seems to be the lefts end all comment but they’re always the offender


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I watched the videos. Read the reporters thoughts. Meh......garbage news. Only thing I though believable was the reporters insistence on another human beings perfection. Demanding what he himself is incapable of doing. Sounds like a reporter. 

 

Should' a , could' a , would' a and a dime and you still couldn't buy a cup of coffee.....or tell anything definitive from the film and report other than everyone concerned is acting like they are about five years old. Spin spin spin. Rubbish. 

Posted

Talk about spin!
 

Nobody is expecting perfection, maybe just a little consistency here. Or I dunno, maybe an apology? Instead of “THEY SET ME UP”! Heard five year olds use that one, right?


 

  • Like 1
Posted
Talk about spin!
 
Nobody is expecting perfection, maybe just a little consistency here. Or I dunno, maybe an apology? Instead of “THEY SET ME UP”! Heard five year olds use that one, right?

 

After watching what they do to judges, politicians, news columnist, talking heads or anyone who dare to question them. This isn’t a surprise.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 826 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...