Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, graystonelbz said:

I wouldn't bother arguing with people that have been wrong in this thread for weeks and hoping for the sky to fall.

No one wants the sky to fall.  I'd rather be prepared for the worst and not have it happen as opposed to putting my head in the sand and hoping it all goes away.

  • Like 2
Posted
Your post are confusing. I have a hard time telling when your talking about a place in the world and the place where you are. 
 
Sky isn't falling because???????? People are cooperating.
 
Have you seen the new USA map on Johns Hopkins? Take note of the hot spot areas. Your area isn't one of them. Look further than your backyard and you will see mitigation.  

You need to re-read my post, or block me. You are confused. I’m well aware of what’s going on. Thank you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


You need to re-read my post, or block me. You are confused. I’m well aware of what’s going on. Thank you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You misunderstand sir. I'm not the least confused about what IS. I'm confused about which area each sentence in your post refers too. Re-read and still can make heads or tails of it.  

 

There is ALLOT going on. 90% of it is noise. I have exactly one agenda. Keeping myself and my family healthy and alive. I could care less whos right, whose wrong, whos sad, mad, glad or running for dog catcher or the party preference of the dog. I don't care about ratings and I most certainly can tell the difference between spin on what I hear and what I've heard. My eyes are not lying. 

 

People get blocked when they get aggressively personal and tell me I'm not seeing exactly what's in front of me and stupid for not agreeing with them. When they become irrational. Irrational is NOT someone simply disagreeing with you. But believing it is....is. You've crossed no line with me. We've butted heads before without blood letting. Why would this be different? 

  • Like 1
Posted

I kinda like this isolation thing.  And it saves a HECK of a lot of money unnecessarily spent.

Many projects done; many projects to do.

  • Like 1
Posted
You misunderstand sir. I'm not the least confused about what IS. I'm confused about which area each sentence in your post refers too. Re-read and still can make heads or tails of it.  
 
There is ALLOT going on. 90% of it is noise. I have exactly one agenda. Keeping myself and my family healthy and alive. I could care less whos right, whose wrong, whos sad, mad, glad or running for dog catcher or the party preference of the dog. I don't care about ratings and I most certainly can tell the difference between spin on what I hear and what I've heard. My eyes are not lying. 
 
People get blocked when they get aggressively personal and tell me I'm not seeing exactly what's in front of me and stupid for not agreeing with them. When they become irrational. Irrational is NOT someone simply disagreeing with you. But believing it is....is. You've crossed no line with me. We've butted heads before without blood letting. Why would this be different? 

The only thing we really disagreed on from the beginning is how bad this is. It continues to be not as bad. I’m very, very skeptical this has been mitigated to the extent we’re being told. California should be really bad off. Just with the gathering across country at grocery stores in the beginning and the infection rates. New Orleans with Madi Gras should be a war zone of infections. Thousands of people spitting on each other beads flying etc. I went to one it’s disgusting. Things just don’t add up. I’ve been say from the beginning of this thread. I haven’t been that far off. Certainly closer than what we’ve been told from the experts. As I said it will bare out we’ll know. I’m definitely not venturing out I don’t want it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
4 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

All I had to do is read the title.

'Hope to prove'. 

 

Hope isn't science. Hope is spin in this context.

I usually find newspaper headlines don't accurately reflect the story. I read that one and it says they're starting a clinical trial, which sounds like science rather than hope to me. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


The only thing we really disagreed on from the beginning is how bad this is. It continues to be not as bad. I’m very, very skeptical this has been mitigated to the extent we’re being told. California should be really bad off. Just with the gathering across country at grocery stores in the beginning and the infection rates. New Orleans with Madi Gras should be a war zone of infections. Thousands of people spitting on each other beads flying etc. I went to one it’s disgusting. Things just don’t add up. I’ve been say from the beginning of this thread. I haven’t been that far off. Certainly closer than what we’ve been told from the experts. As I said it will bare out we’ll know. I’m definitely not venturing out I don’t want it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Stan I'm not sure we even disagree on that. We see the same things...pretty much. I'm going to toss something at the wall and you tell me if you think it sticks. Okay?

 

If I read you right, and I think I do, you see a less than flu season event and as you are not convinced that mitigation is anything near what is reported. IF that is true than it isn't as deadly as the reports of it claim. Mitigation is the 'hinge" point. The level and degree. If true I would be forced to agree. I'm a reasonable person I think.

 

I believe the low numbers are due to a very effective set of measures and that IF those measures would not have been put in place these numbers, death, cases, would be horrendous thus quite deadly. Mitigation is the 'hinge" point, the level and degree.

 

How am I doing so far?  

  • Like 1
Posted
Stan I'm not sure we even disagree on that. We see the same things...pretty much. I'm going to toss something at the wall and you tell me if you think it sticks. Okay?
 
If I read you right, and I think I do, you see a less than flu season event and as you are not convinced that mitigation is anything near what is reported. IF that is true than it isn't as deadly as the reports of it claim. Mitigation is the 'hinge" point. The level and degree. If true I would be forced to agree. I'm a reasonable person I think.
 
I believe the low numbers are due to a very effective set of measures and that IF those measures would not have been put in place these numbers, death, cases, would be horrendous thus quite deadly. Mitigation is the 'hinge" point, the level and degree.
 
How am I doing so far?  

Based on what I’ve witnessed. I think I’ve said it all along. I don’t believe that this level of shut down was needed. Why? Just driving around grocery store I saw crowds upon crowds. Busier than Christmas. People going nuts. No mitigation. Horrible as it may sound. I believe with warnings for the old, sick to stay home. The country could have stayed open with some restrictions. Then maybe a bad flu year 60-80K deaths. A bad flu year. Just because we were blind sided.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
31 minutes ago, KARNUT said:


Based on what I’ve witnessed. I think I’ve said it all along. I don’t believe that this level of shut down was needed. Why? Just driving around grocery store I saw crowds upon crowds. Busier than Christmas. People going nuts. No mitigation. Horrible as it may sound. I believe with warnings for the old, sick to stay home. The country could have stayed open with some restrictions. Then maybe a bad flu year 60-80K deaths. A bad flu year. Just because we were blind sided.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Okay so I'm VERY close. Our disagreement is over degree. Not as big as it seemed? 

 

I watched C-SPAN off and on today. It was LIVE and thus spin free. I also noted the new Johns Hopkins county by county maps that came on line today with specifics about each for the entire USA. A few weeks ago before we had this tool I noted that along the Interstate system you saw clusters of cases spring up. Routes people took leaving hot spots and...taking the virus with them.  Not smart but VERY human to run from a burning building even if you light everything in your path on fire. What ya going to do, right. 

 

Now I note that the places it was taken to have their own "heat". The level of heat dependent on population DENSITY PER SQUARE measure. As this virus spreads by close contact this makes perfect sense. It can never be as bad in Walworth South Dakota case wise, death toll wise with a population density of 7.7 persons per square mile as the five boroughs of New York City where the density is 26,403 people per square mile. The latter is a person per 1055 square feet. About the size of my garage. The former a person per 3.6 MILLION square feet. Sounds like they ought be treated differently...until you look at medical services available. I made note a day or so ago that we have counties in Illinois with fewer than 4 ICU beds and vents for the ENTIRE county. Walworth is such a county. 4 ICU beds. Not allot for 5,587 people and they are close to NO WHERE. 

 

Question. How long would it take to create the perfect measured regional response for 3,143 counties? AND synchronize all the moving parts, Education, Labor, Transportation. 

 

Exactly like you, I watch everyday people not taking it serious. Congregating and ignoring instructions. Yet these are the minority not the majority. At least in my neck of the woods. I have no clue about yours so trust your observations completely.

 

I hear the same things you hear and the reporting I heard on C-SPAN today during the Trump segment....made me wonder why this guy does not hand the reigns to some second guessing Monday morning quarterback reporter and say,..."Here, you fix it! You seem to have all the answers. Have at".

 

As educated as our opinions may be and regardless how well we believe our facts to be vetted not a single person on this site would last an hour at the controls. That the case ………….

 

The numbers will be what the numbers will be when it is all said and done and THEN we can argue over the Whys and What if's.

 

Keep your head down and your powder dry. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Cpl_Punishment said:

I usually find newspaper headlines don't accurately reflect the story. I read that one and it says they're starting a clinical trial, which sounds like science rather than hope to me. 

A perfect example of reporter spin to grab the light. Glad you read it. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

A perfect example of reporter spin to grab the light. Glad you read it. 

Is it spin or is it just editors who only skim their writers' stories before trying to come up with a catchy title? 

  • Like 1
Posted

Did you know that as of today exactly 1/3 of all confirmed cases in the USA are in the state of New York?

Did you know that 43% of all COVID-19 deaths in the USA are in the state of New York? 

Did you know that 51% of all 'serious' cases in the USA are in the state of New York?

 

Did you know that 54.5% of all New York State cases are in the county of New York?

Did you know that 73.5% of all COVID-19 fatalities for the state of New York are in the county of New York?

Did you know that the current mortality rate in New York County is 6.68%?

 

Did you know there are 6,898 dead in just that county.

Did you know that 29% of all COVID-19 deaths come from a single county. New York.  

 

Did you know that only 6.33% of the population in the county of New York are confirmed infected? 

Now imagine these numbers with an unabated 60-70% infection rate.

Just give it a thought.

 

Shelter in Place works.  

  • Like 1
Posted
Did you know that as of today exactly 1/3 of all confirmed cases in the USA are in the state of New York?
Did you know that 43% of all COVID-19 deaths in the USA are in the state of New York? 
Did you know that 51% of all 'serious' cases in the USA are in the state of New York?
 
Did you know that 54.5% of all New York State cases are in the county of New York?
Did you know that 73.5% of all COVID-19 fatalities for the state of New York are in the county of New York?
Did you know that the current mortality rate in New York County is 6.68%?
 
Did you know there are 6,898 dead in just that county.
Did you know that 29% of all COVID-19 deaths come from a single county. New York.  
 
Did you know that only 6.33% of the population in the county of New York are confirmed infected? 
Now imagine these numbers with an unabated 60-70% infection rate.
Just give it a thought.
 
Shelter in Place works.  

New York is an outlier. Population density and no chance at early warning. If anything they should have been hit harder. Some of their local leaders encourage crowds early on. Their entire local government was claiming 30-40 thousand deaths. New Orleans should have been just as bad. Houston had the live stock show. It went for a few days before the shut down. I know we’re going back and forth on this. I believe semi isolation, you believe total. There’s something going on here. There’s places that should have been hit hard that didn’t mitigate. I think the answer may be this bug has been around longer than the experts know. Some people may not be affected. Or mutation like the cold and flu. They original goal was to keep hospitalization at a minimum. Now some people want a no infection promise. Some doctors are reminding us just who is at risk. People with underlying issues. I believe Tucker Carlson last night said out of all the deaths in New York. 100 people had no underlying issues they could find. That’s the type of numbers that should be front and center. The fear mongering headlines will only encourage fear. It’ll wreck our world as we know it. Time to be more positive. Me I’m at high risk I’ll stay home. I’m mature enough to understand that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 696 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...