Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I bought mine new right from Range and mine also blocks the onstar monthly diagnostics report.

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Chewy21 said:


Did you buy it used? Is it updated to the latest firmware?

I bought it new, directly from Range. I contacted them about it after a while and they said they had a firmware update and all I had to do was send it to them. Got it back and it was harsher with the shifts and still blocked OnStar. I called them back and they said "oh well that's all we can do your truck is different for some reason". So I wrote a review about the experience and the owner or someone high up contacted me and asked if I wanted to return it for a full refund. Issaid yes and if I was given the option I would have picked it earlier instead of the "oh well".

Edited by doropallo
Posted
On 1/27/2021 at 12:21 PM, bayouguy71 said:

I bought mine new right from Range and mine also blocks the onstar monthly diagnostics report.

 

I think this is true with anything that stays plugged into the OBD-II port.  I used to use the Automatic sensor for vehicle monitoring in my 2014 and briefly in my 2018 and whenever it was installed, OnStar reports would be blocked.

Posted
1 hour ago, Darmichar said:

I think this is true with anything that stays plugged into the OBD-II port.  I used to use the Automatic sensor for vehicle monitoring in my 2014 and briefly in my 2018 and whenever it was installed, OnStar reports would be blocked.

True, but they claim that the updated firmware doesn't. There's some guys here that have stated their diagnostics isn't blocked.

Posted

The one I ran from April 2019 until April 2020 did not block OnStar.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Posted

I had the Range box from my 2012 Sierra 5.3 updated to run in the 2019 5.3. It does block the Onstar updates, but that is fine with me.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

don't bother paying for onstar nonsense so i wouldn't know if its blocking anything on mine, but the truck shifts the same as before installation for me. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Hieneken49 said:

don't bother paying for onstar nonsense so i wouldn't know if its blocking anything on mine, but the truck shifts the same as before installation for me. 

If don't pay for it either, they offer a free diagnostic report that I receive every month.

Posted
On 1/27/2021 at 1:21 PM, bayouguy71 said:

I bought mine new right from Range and mine also blocks the onstar monthly diagnostics report.

 

Well, I stand corrected, at least for this month.

If I knew for sure what day they ran the diagnostic I could tell you.

I am beginning to wonder if my truck has been in the pole barn / garage each time this has run since October when I got mine because this month I got my report as usual?

 

Posted
On 5/8/2020 at 10:35 PM, Matthew Lennon said:

Mileage goes up? I figured I’d lose some mileage. I drive mostly highway miles and around the farm. 

It’s bullshit.  My carefully measured MPG on a 400 mi round trip (on one way, off going back) on highway was about 4MPG better without the Range.  Not substantial but there nonetheless less.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks, so being a different beast altogether, anyone know what the "optimal" temp is for the 10L80/90 for proper shifting?
    • How many years have I pointed out every point in that link to the folks here and been avalanched with criticisms and outright hostilities at times? I ran counter to even the great CUSTOMBOSS and Lake Speed Jr and the half dozen experts on YouTube and in the final.....GM, Physics (Stribeck) backs that Grumpy old Bear.    Honestly, I never said a thing engineering hadn't studied silly and laid in concrete during WWII. But I'm old, the information is old and yet, the Laws of Physics are eternal.    Okay there is one exception. I vehemently disagree with their use of the word 'tolerances' when what it meant is "clearance".   The clearance is the distance between two objects. The tolerance is the degree of acceptable variation permitted in that clearance. I.E., piston to bore clearance is 0.004" with a tolerance of +/- .0002" so the clearance is in specification if it lies between 0.0038" and 0.0042". Cutting that 'tolerance in half has ZERO impact on lubrication requirements. Makes for more difficulty in manufacturing.  But a tighter clearance 'MAY'. Depends on finish. Anyway....   It's one of those statements made by people to make themselves look smarter than they are to convince people who are as un-enlighten as they seem to manipulate their behaviors. But hey, the blind leading the blind puts them both in the pit. 
    • Out and about yesterday on a long Saturday drive I passed a lot of Shell stations. My preferred, so I pay attention. Lot's of small town Illinois so not six stations in three blocks like the city.    Everyone of them over a radius of say 100 miles had regular at $4.19 but one which was the one closest to home at $4.15. However Premium pricing varied greatly between 85 cents over regular to $1.50 over. I'm not counting the price of the station with the lowest regular so the reference is the same for the remainder and all within the same brand. However the spread discrepancy holds across all brands.     @txab, any thoughts on that? 
    • What are your thoughts? The Chevy Blazer relaunch was an epic case of 'lunchbag letdown'. Jeep Wranglers and Ford Broncos stick out like a sore thumb.    The AI photos do not look like a 'retro version', but shrunken Tahoes. Get away from the 'futuristic look'. I've seen two concepts. One had rectangular headlight like a Rivian and the other way too big headlights (similar to a previous non-Wrangler SUV) should include dual round headlights like the early version.   If not this would look OK   At least it has GM styling (albeit the K2XX) A lot of the images floating around look like Bronco IIs or the current Bronco. Looking at the Broncos in my area (central Ontario, it seems to be a mix of 2 doors and 4 doors, 'mall rated' to ones that could go offroad.    I'm sure a AT4 and AT4X RPOs could be outfitted similar to a Rubicon if the braintrust understood the whole offroad scene. Crossing my fingers that if it does see the light that the front air dam/bumper doesn't extend below the center line of the tire...      
    • I saw this news earlier this year:   https://theautowire.com/2026/06/12/gm-kills-off-chevys-biggest-silverado-trucks-as-sales-collapse-and-factory-fallout-spreads/
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...