Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

As the title states I am putting some new tires on the truck.  Right now I have the 275/60/20 Bridgestone Alenza. 

 

I have pretty much decided on the Goodyear Ultraterrain.  We like to wheel on OBX and head to the mountains in the winter so these seem like a great option imo.

 

My question I have stock suspension.  I originally wanted to go with a 285/65/20 to give it a beefier look.  Then I started looking at going with the stock size but noticed it was an SL rated.

 

As someone who will be towing in the future should I go with the larger tire size in the E load or will I be fine with an SL?

 

Thanks for the help. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, thegrizz said:

As the title states I am putting some new tires on the truck.  Right now I have the 275/60/20 Bridgestone Alenza. 

 

 

 

I have pretty much decided on the Goodyear Ultraterrain.  We like to wheel on OBX and head to the mountains in the winter so these seem like a great option imo.

 

My question I have stock suspension.  I originally wanted to go with a 285/65/20 to give it a beefier look.  Then I started looking at going with the stock size but noticed it was an SL rated.

 

As someone who will be towing in the future should I go with the larger tire size in the E load or will I be fine with an SL?

 

Thanks for the help. 

You will be fine with the SL, just check that the tire's load rating meets your needs.  E would be necessary on 2500s and 3500s.

 

I recommend you check out the Falken Wildpeak AT3W.  These are great tires.

Posted

Wouldn't the 285/65 rub on stock suspension ? Nice tire size though . Post pics! 

Posted

If you wheel, I would step up in rating in the stock size. Plenty of people run C range tires with good results. I run E and haven't had a flat in 120,000 miles so I'll be sticking with them.....

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I replaced my alenza's with the 275/60/20 Ultraterrains and I love them!  You might have rubbing issues with the 285/65/20 with no level or lift. Here is a photo of mine.

IMG_20200531_075702_8.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
43 minutes ago, hihosilverado said:

Ken....your truck looks great.  What lift/level kit do you have?

Thank you.  I have the GM AT4 lift.  I also added the Zone 1.75 level kit and UCAs to be safe.  I think this photo is before I added the level though.

Posted

Ken, the truck looks great. As for the topic here, I have the stock Goodyear Duratracs on my truck with 11,000 miles on them and they have been great. Off road they perform and on road they only whine a little. I couldn't be happier even if they are the stock tire. As for the tire width, you really do need to check max turn on the wheel wells...

20201002_070654.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Thanks everyone.  Decided not to go with a 285.  My choices are 275/60 in SL or 275/65 in E with the Ultraterrain.  Leaning towards the 75 since it will be a bit taller and tougher tire.  I've never had anything other than LT tires on my trucks so to me the SL's are a bit mushy. 

 

Discount Tire tells me the 275/65/20 will fit no problem.  I agree.  Anyone have any experience?

 

Posted
11 hours ago, thegrizz said:

Thanks everyone.  Decided not to go with a 285.  My choices are 275/60 in SL or 275/65 in E with the Ultraterrain.  Leaning towards the 75 since it will be a bit taller and tougher tire.  I've never had anything other than LT tires on my trucks so to me the SL's are a bit mushy. 

 

Discount Tire tells me the 275/65/20 will fit no problem.  I agree.  Anyone have any experience?

 

I have the 275/65/20 Ultra terrains on a 2019 Silverado with a front level only. They fit great and do not rub at all and I have 10000 on them so far and they are wearing great.

Posted
51 minutes ago, arvid.garey said:

I have the 275/65/20 Ultra terrains on a 2019 Silverado with a front level only. They fit great and do not rub at all and I have 10000 on them so far and they are wearing great.

you figure they would fit without a level?  Seems to be a lot of wheel well left to fill on these trucks. 

Posted
53 minutes ago, thegrizz said:

you figure they would fit without a level?  Seems to be a lot of wheel well left to fill on these trucks. 

They are a full 1" taller. I am not sure if that would fit or not, sorry.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...