Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Radio issues, they are the following:

1) won’t turn on when vehicle starts

2) will make a loud screeching sound then turn off

3) during these malfunctions, you will loose all cameras, on star menu, directions, etc.

will be taking this back to the nearest dealership, under warranty work. 
I have talked to a lot of other people who have experienced the same thing and they were all told that the radio needs to be replaced

  • Sad 1
Posted

Really?  You talked to "a lot of other people" with that problem?  That's really unusual, as if it were at all that common, there would be A LOT of people bitching about it here.  Like say, the rear window leak thread is...

 

How about just taking it in to the dealer and seeing what they say about the problem.

Posted

Why thank you for being such helpful. I actually have taken it to the dealership and yes the radio is a malfunctioning problem.

I honestly didn’t know I had to be an **** to join.. thanks for sharing

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

What do you expect as a response to your post?

 

In your initial post, you indicated that you WILL be taking it to the dealer to have them look at it, and now it's you HAVE taken it to the dealer?  Which is it?  If you already took it to the dealer, what was the result?

 

It's too bad something went wrong with your truck, but that is exactly what the warranty is for.

Posted

i think you were a little harsh to a first time poster, i am interested in knowing if he took it to the dealership did they replace the radio and the problem was fixed

  • Like 1
Posted

I’ve had repeated radio shut off issues and have taken to dealer twice and they say until there is a recall they can’t do anything so i have to live with my radio shutting off and restarting. 
 

Pisses me off but it is what it is I guess

Posted

Having a radio problem also,  mine is running such that a change in program no matter what it is, volume, fan control, application changes all take 5 to 15 seconds to respond even a simple button press could take awhile to get a response. Bluetooth to telephone will pick up all my contacts and tells me it is good for calls in and out but the phone will not receive or send calls. Android auto will work sometimes for some things, the term intermittent comes to mind. 

The unit has been checked at the dealership and was hooked up to GM Tech. so they could look at the problem. GM claims they have not seen that problem before. Their conclusion was defective radio and a replacement is on order, of course they are on Back Order at the factory, go figure. Dealership is telling me in other vehicles, with bad radios, they have waited up to 6 months for a replacement.

Not something I wanted to hear on a new truck.

Oh, I guess I should have asked for  davester's permission to post this first, seeing he is leaving the impression that there is something wrong about posting a problem because that's exactly what warranty is for and by golly he is a Senior Enthusiass.

 

Posted
47 minutes ago, InTrouble said:

Having a radio problem also,  mine is running such that a change in program no matter what it is, volume, fan control, application changes all take 5 to 15 seconds to respond even a simple button press could take awhile to get a response. Bluetooth to telephone will pick up all my contacts and tells me it is good for calls in and out but the phone will not receive or send calls. Android auto will work sometimes for some things, the term intermittent comes to mind. 

The unit has been checked at the dealership and was hooked up to GM Tech. so they could look at the problem. GM claims they have not seen that problem before. Their conclusion was defective radio and a replacement is on order, of course they are on Back Order at the factory, go figure. Dealership is telling me in other vehicles, with bad radios, they have waited up to 6 months for a replacement.

Not something I wanted to hear on a new truck.

Oh, I guess I should have asked for  davester's permission to post this first, seeing he is leaving the impression that there is something wrong about posting a problem because that's exactly what warranty is for and by golly he is a Senior Enthusiass.

 

Not sure why he is commenting in this section anyway...his signature says he drives an 04 3500.  Not that there is anything wrong with that of course . With 3,361 posts, Im pretty sure this isn't the first time he's been unhelpful and reached troll status on someone elses genuine issue. This is the trouble shooting thread, right. Geez! BTW, my radio sucks too, every day. Does all kind of crap!

Posted

what trolling?   The O.P. is the one with the trolling "I've got this problem, so it obviously happens to everyone".  He didn't indicate doing anything to resolve the problem, so, with a new truck, the first thing you do is drag it to the dealer to get them to fix it, which I suggested.  Then he changed his story that he had already taken it to the dealer, but didn't say what the result of that visit was.

 

He didn't ask about troubleshooting the problem, he was just bitching about having one.

 

If he had written all that (minus the bs about "I have talked to a lot of other people who have experienced the same thing and they were all told that the radio needs to be replaced") and that he had already taken it to the dealer, and the dealer didn't fix the problem for whatever reason, I wouldn't have posted in this thread.

Posted

If you read the comment again, maybe, you may have the same opinion I did, that he had already taken the truck to the dealer about the malfunctioning radio.

 

"will be taking this back to the nearest dealership, under warranty work."

 

Maybe you just jumped to a conclusion that wasn't there.

 

Posted
21 hours ago, davester said:

what trolling?   The O.P. is the one with the trolling "I've got this problem, so it obviously happens to everyone".  He didn't indicate doing anything to resolve the problem, so, with a new truck, the first thing you do is drag it to the dealer to get them to fix it, which I suggested.  Then he changed his story that he had already taken it to the dealer, but didn't say what the result of that visit was.

 

He didn't ask about troubleshooting the problem, he was just bitching about having one.

 

If he had written all that (minus the bs about "I have talked to a lot of other people who have experienced the same thing and they were all told that the radio needs to be replaced") and that he had already taken it to the dealer, and the dealer didn't fix the problem for whatever reason, I wouldn't have posted in this thread.

Trolling at its finest!  You provided no helpful information while speaking offensively hoping to invoke an negative emotional response.  You don't own a vehicle remotely close to the one thats being commented on, therefore you have zero personal experience with the issue. You provided no helpful information.  You said he claimed it must be happening to everyone, which he did not.  A lot of people is different than everyone, just so you understand.  His resolution on fixing the issue was bringing it back to the dealership under warranty work, you may have missed that part.  You didn't suggest anything that he had not already stated bud.  Theres no bitching in his statement either..he's simply stating the problems with his radio, so maybe he can gain knowledge from others with the same experience and see if they've had good luck with repair.  Also, he may have already been to a dealer, hence the words, bringing back to the nearest dealer, indicating a prior visit.  Ive had mine "updated" already twice by the dealer, but is still acting up regularly .  Why is it bs that he says that he's talked to a lot of people??  Impossible that he's part of another forum besides this one?? Or that he has ran into a few people with a bad radio??  Btw, there are plenty of people on this forum expressing issues with this radio, me being one of them.  My conclusion is this, you don't own this truck, therefore you just don't know what your talking about.  Go monitor another thread and maybe this guy will get some help, and we can all learn something. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I think your wasting your time Landon, just put him on ignore, he is not worth dealing with. 

Posted
On 10/17/2020 at 10:04 AM, InTrouble said:

I think your wasting your time Landon, just put him on ignore, he is not worth dealing with. 

Agreed...just can't stand people like that. Alpha male, type A, you're dumber than I am, type of person. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...