Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

a set of police handcuffs under part of the dash frame of the truck would be an idea, the other side of the cuffs should wrap around the gun and trigger gaurd. this should be enough concealment and quick access for most while driving. 

Posted

The act of carrying a gun is to prevent being a victim. Not an intent to kill. IMO.

  • Like 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, flyingfool said:

a set of police handcuffs under part of the dash frame of the truck would be an idea, the other side of the cuffs should wrap around the gun and trigger gaurd. this should be enough concealment and quick access for most while driving. 

I've seen a version using a chain and padlock. The guy bolted it to the body underneath the box. Box  had a hole in the bottom the chain ran through. Then padlock through the trigger guard. The length was set so that is virtually, if not impossible, to get bolt cutters on anything. Anything that will add time to the theft is a good thing

Posted

I guess if a drunk steals your car and kills someone it the owners fault too!?. The laws keep people from carrying in certain places. Need to be changed. That way there’re wouldn’t be a need to leave the gun in the vehicle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

Premeditation? Definitely not how anyone who has a permit views it. And more importantly, not how the law views it.

 

In CCW training, the main take-away was ironically to NOT use the weapon. Don’t be a hero. Retreat if at all possible. It’s a last resort when your own (or a family member’s) death is imminent. 


Because even if using force is justified, you’re going to be in legal limbo for some time with the aggressive, anti-gun DAs we have running around. It’s the last thing I would want to be involved in unless I literally had no other choice.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I guess if a drunk steals your car and kills someone it the owners fault too!?. The laws keep people from carrying in certain places. Need to be changed. That way there’re wouldn’t be a need to leave the gun in the vehicle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

seeing your from Texas,  and being there is a mass exodus of liberal commies from Kalifornia to AZ,New Mex, And Texas area's, you guys  can exspect more laws like this to place the blame and responsability onto the owner, even if your not really responsable. oh yeah, and the commies will make you pay for it with higher taxes. get prepared guys the commie wave is coming no matter who is president

 

i personally recommend using and locking up an 80% gun with no numbers to be tracked back to yall'

Edited by flyingfool
Posted

I would not use an 80% gun (or any modified gun even) for self defense. Reliability aside, you’re opening up a huge bag of worms if you need to use it. In court, you know the DA will paint you to be a trigger happy gun nut who manufactured an un-serialized pistol to evade detection. It’s not a good look.

  • Sad 1
Posted
seeing your from Texas,  and being there is a mass exodus of liberal commies from Kalifornia to AZ,New Mex, And Texas area's, you guys  can exspect more laws like this to place the blame and responsability onto the owner, even if your not really responsable. oh yeah, and the commies will make you pay for it with higher taxes. get prepared guys the commie wave is coming no matter who is president
 
i personally recommend using and locking up an 80% gun with no numbers to be tracked back to yall'

Being political isn’t allowed here. That being said our cities in Texas are falling slowly but surely. Amazing how one state gets ruined to the point of mass exodus. Only those residents never learn only to repeat somewhere else. See I can be factual without being political. Just the facts, jack. I don’t carry or travel with a gun. I am mindful of where I travel. If there’s ever a national wide permit to carry or I get fearful of my safety. Then I’ll carry. It is our right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

So glad my comments got deleted on here. A liberal must have gotten upset that I stated "he" shouldn't be allowed to have a keyboard by making pointless comments! I guess we don't have freedom of speech!?!  ??

 

Anyways, GM makes a new rear storage area that is lockable. It would be a great place to put it while your away from your truck. Then when return, you could put it back in front counsel area. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted

i have large sums of cash at times for work and it always stays on my body 100% of the time, and i am no bad ass by any means but rather it with me than without, lol.....

Posted
On 11/6/2020 at 2:41 PM, TNTSilverado said:

So glad my comments got deleted on here. A liberal must have gotten upset that I stated "he" shouldn't be allowed to have a keyboard by making pointless comments! I guess we don't have freedom of speech!?!  ??

 

Anyways, GM makes a new rear storage area that is lockable. It would be a great place to put it while your away from your truck. Then when return, you could put it back in front counsel area. 

The site was down for a day and some content across the site was lost due to having to load a back up copy of the site to the servers.

 

Your post apparently fell into that category. I can find no trace of it.

 

But yes there are limits on speech here. Read the site guidelines

 

Posted
11 hours ago, txab said:

The site was down for a day and some content across the site was lost due to having to load a back up copy of the site to the servers.

 

Your post apparently fell into that category. I can find no trace of it.

 

But yes there are limits on speech here. Read the site guidelines

 

I call bs...my post was deleted as well and I had a quoted reply that’s nowhere to be found. This forum sucks anyways all bullshit advertisements   in between the same useless questions asked over and over.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/6/2020 at 12:41 PM, TNTSilverado said:

So glad my comments got deleted on here. A liberal must have gotten upset that I stated "he" shouldn't be allowed to have a keyboard by making pointless comments! I guess we don't have freedom of speech!?!  ??

 

Anyways, GM makes a new rear storage area that is lockable. It would be a great place to put it while your away from your truck. Then when return, you could put it back in front counsel area. 

No such thing as freedom of speech in this snowflake “liberal” controlled internet. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 651 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...