Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, MacLaren said:

Another thing, and please correct me if I'm wrong. This truck, having skid plates as an option from the factory could be classified as a Z71, correct? Isn't the main feature of the Z71 skid plates? I know 1500 has the bigger air filter I think but, what all exactly makes a 2500 a Z71 besides Skid Plates?

Yeah, skid plates, Rancho Shocks, Eaton Locker, hill descent, badging...

You are correct about the 5.3 feeling faster, but it wakes up when you break it in a bit.  Also, it never really feels underpowered.  You will find the tranny is better sorted as well.  It's just more of a truck.

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Limelight said:

Yeah, skid plates, Rancho Shocks, Eaton Locker, hill descent, badging...

You are correct about the 5.3 feeling faster, but it wakes up when you break it in a bit.  Also, it never really feels underpowered.  You will find the tranny is better sorted as well.  It's just more of a truck.

Yes it is!!

But, as far as the Eaton locker, I still have electronic locking rear, correct?

Posted

I’m not aware of any electronic locking rear; the G80 is what you get and it “automatic” locking; but not electronic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, MacLaren said:

Yes it is!!

But, as far as the Eaton locker, I still have electronic locking rear, correct?

No.  Just the Eaton. It's fully automatic but it is a true locker.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, TrailBoss1 said:

I’m not aware of any electronic locking rear; the G80 is what you get and it “automatic” locking; but not electronic.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Right, that's what I meant, thanx 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Limelight said:

No.  Just the Eaton. It's fully automatic but it is a true locker.

Thanx man. That's plenty good for me 😀

Posted

Thank you! I love it too, I actually founded the NorthSky Blie Club here 😀

I think they did a fantastic job with this one too

zoom in and check out the reflection of the branches on the hood.....trying to decide whether or not to have her ceramic coated or just wax her every once and a while 

spacer.png

  • Like 1
Posted

Just curious as to what payload yall have?

I figured mine would be 3,760 but the sticker says 2850 I think?

Conventional Trailering 14,500

Gooseneck Trailering  16,500 

Shouldn't the payload be around 3600 or more?

 

Posted
On 3/2/2021 at 10:29 AM, T.O. said:

You will just have to get used to not seeing as much directly in front of you since the hood blocks more of your front view. But I think the overall view is plenty good.

I'm 6' tall and still getting used to not seeing much in front.  Takes some practice to split the parking spot lines once you're between them.  Don't get me wrong, I love the truck.  What's really fun is when I get back in my '00 1500 and it feels like driving a golf cart.

 

As for payload and towing.  Yes, the payload depends on your specific configurations and options.  Tow ratings are the ~same regardless.  My SLT CCSB 4x4 is 3319 payload, 14500 conventional, 16620 gooseneck.

Posted
55 minutes ago, MacLaren said:

Just curious as to what payload yall have?

I figured mine would be 3,760 but the sticker says 2850 I think?

Conventional Trailering 14,500

Gooseneck Trailering  16,500 

Shouldn't the payload be around 3600 or more?

 

A gasser Custom with 20" rims should get you 10650 GVWR which means the quoted 3760 lbs payload rating so 2850 or 900lbs under that seems like more than a configuration or package issue. I wonder if you got a truck with the lower 10000 GVWR de-rate? I've seen it on some trucks on the inventory pages where the truck has 18" or 20" rims and the "10000 lb GVWR" is on the build sheet/window sticker as an option. My assumption was this was for licensing/registration purposes in some states. If that's the case, a 10000 lb GVWR only get you up to 3139 lb for payload and I can see the 300lb reduction being due to configuration. I just looked on the build site and it's an option to get a 10000 lb GVWR on the Custom even with 20" rims. If this is the case, my assumption is that this is only a sticker/rating issue and not a physical limitation of the truck but I may be wrong.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...