Jump to content

6.6L Gas will be fine, right?

Z71RAD88

By Z71RAD88
in 6.6L Gas V8 (L8T)

 Share

Recommended Posts

nards444 Senior Enthusiast

nards444

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, L8T said:

All it takes is one not so light wind to ruin your day. 
You must live somewhere where the wind doesn’t blow and there are no mountains cuz I guarantee if you lived in the western half of the continent you would change your tune in a hurry. 
 

I too have owned a few half tons. I would NEVER tell anyone that tows anything over 5000lbs especially an rv that it tows as good as a bigger heavier truck. That’s the worst lie I’ve ever heard. 

uhhh  i did preface the statement by saying if there is light to no wind.   And Tractors blow over in wind too.  Sometimes getting off the road or slowing down isnt a bad option either

Edited by nards444
  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

TrailBoss1
TrailBoss1

It’s similar to the transmission used in the 6.0; but significantly upgraded. Additional clutch packs and the torque converter transplanted from the Allison (with changes to the balancers because harm

MacLaren
MacLaren

Here she is....

Limelight
Limelight

Hey there! I can share my experience on this exact topic.  I originally purchased a '19 1500 LTZ for the purpose of towing my new 37' travel trailer.  The tow limits were easily in spec, and ever

Posted Images

TrailBoss1 Enthusiast

TrailBoss1

Posted
Posted
The 6 speed in the HD's is not the same one as the one used in 1500's.
 
It's carry forward from the 6.0L days.  Imo, it will be fine behind the 6.6 gas.

It’s similar to the transmission used in the 6.0; but significantly upgraded. Additional clutch packs and the torque converter transplanted from the Allison (with changes to the balancers because harmonics of the gas motor differ from the diesel).

Regarding comparisons between 1500 and 2500, I traded a ‘19 1500 TrailBoss (5.3) on a ‘21 3500 gasser (6.6). Prior to this I owned 2011 6.0; 2015 6.6 Duramax; and a 2016 Duramax Dually. Gives me a pretty good basis for comparison. The 1500 towed our 23’ Center Console fairly well. But it often felt as though the “tail was wagging the dog”. The 3500 is an entirely different experience; in part due to the weight and wheelbase of the HD.

On the same trip (not towing) of about 200 miles (to a weekend residence) the 5.3 averaged 20.2 MPG; the 6.6 averages 18. Ride quality difference in the 3500 is not discernibly different than the TrailBoss (and markedly improved over prior generations). And that’s with tires inflated at the recommended 60 front; 80 rear.

Yes, the Ecoboost certainly produces excellent power; but, there’s a reason it’s not offered in the Superduty - long term durability. Same reason GM didn’t simply drop the 6.2 (which produces Slightly more HP and slightly less TQ than the 6.6) in the HD (aluminum block versus cast iron, etc).

To dismiss the HD gasser (per one poster) seems myopic. Rather than maxing out a 1500, I’d much prefer to have more truck if towing anywhere near the limits of the 1500. Stronger motor (durability); stronger transmission; bigger brakes; load range E tires, etc. Likewise, if I were towing near the limits of the gasser routinely, the diesel would be preferable.

To suggest there’s no niche for a 2500/3500 gasser; and the choice should be either 1500 gas or 2500/3500 isn’t a position id agree with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
kenny_r Enthusiast

kenny_r

Posted
Posted

Yea that’s why I purchased a 2500 gas. Need the payload and I don’t haul over 10k. Like the idea of having the weight, brakes, suspension ect. The more i cruise through the diesel forums the happier I am about the choice to stick with gas. I mean the new 6.6 is rated for what...like 16k lbs? Surprised that so many get still get sucked into the diesel game....but I guess if ur not gonna keep it past the warranty like most, it doesn’t matter.lol.

  • Like 2
MacLaren Enthusiast

MacLaren

Posted
Posted
18 hours ago, L8T said:

All it takes is one not so light wind to ruin your day. 
You must live somewhere where the wind doesn’t blow and there are no mountains cuz I guarantee if you lived in the western half of the continent you would change your tune in a hurry. 
 

I too have owned a few half tons. I would NEVER tell anyone that tows anything over 5000lbs especially an rv that it tows as good as a bigger heavier truck. That’s the worst lie I’ve ever heard. 

Lol, yup.

Our trailer was 6500 pounds brand new without anything in it. We hauled it home with my 19 1500 and it was working her pretty good. 

Tomorrow, I'm getting a new 21 2500

That 2500 besides that awesome 6.6 gasser has enough ass on her to where she won't be shoved around like that 1500, nor will she strain as much going over mountains.

I agree with your post 1,000%

  • Like 1
nards444 Senior Enthusiast

nards444

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 3/2/2021 at 9:44 PM, TrailBoss1 said:




Yes, the Ecoboost certainly produces excellent power; but, there’s a reason it’s not offered in the Superduty - long term durability. Same reason GM didn’t simply drop the 6.2 (which produces Slightly more HP and slightly less TQ than the 6.6) in the HD (aluminum block versus cast iron, etc).

To dismiss the HD gasser (per one poster) seems myopic. Rather than maxing out a 1500, I’d much prefer to have more truck if towing anywhere near the limits of the 1500. Stronger motor (durability); stronger transmission; bigger brakes; load range E tires, etc. Likewise, if I were towing near the limits of the gasser routinely, the diesel would be preferable.

To suggest there’s no niche for a 2500/3500 gasser; and the choice should be either 1500 gas or 2500/3500 isn’t a position id agree with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I knew I was going to get some push back and I sort of preempted with that.  But don't take what I said out of context.  End of the day a 3/4 ton chassis will haul and essentially do work better than a half ton 98% of the time regardless of engine. 

 

As for the ecoboost Ive heard the longevity claim a lot,  but we are now 10 years into it and the engines seem to be holding out,  will they last like a diesel no, but Im not sure theres any evidence they would last less than a big gas motor.  Tbh ive heard this from the day these things came out  From what I have heard ford has tinkered with putting it into the big trucks,  they have also replaced the 6.2 in the raptor with it.  But like I said i would still stand with my statement with that big eco engine with a tow haul package against any 3/4 gasser,  thats just based off my experience.

 

Gassers have their place.  Things like snow plowing,  work applications etc,  and frankly is cheaper than a diesel and at the end of the day will get you from point A to B.  My point really was picking how much are you towing,  where are you doing it, and how much weight.  Again any under 5-6k your waisting your money on a bigger truck,  anything bigger than 5-6k I think it comes down to how often and how you are towing.  Towing a handful of times a year maybe a half ton is for you.

Edited by nards444
MacLaren Enthusiast

MacLaren

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, TrailBoss1 said:


It’s similar to the transmission used in the 6.0; but significantly upgraded. Additional clutch packs and the torque converter transplanted from the Allison (with changes to the balancers because harmonics of the gas motor differ from the diesel).

Regarding comparisons between 1500 and 2500, I traded a ‘19 1500 TrailBoss (5.3) on a ‘21 3500 gasser (6.6). Prior to this I owned 2011 6.0; 2015 6.6 Duramax; and a 2016 Duramax Dually. Gives me a pretty good basis for comparison. The 1500 towed our 23’ Center Console fairly well. But it often felt as though the “tail was wagging the dog”. The 3500 is an entirely different experience; in part due to the weight and wheelbase of the HD.

On the same trip (not towing) of about 200 miles (to a weekend residence) the 5.3 averaged 20.2 MPG; the 6.6 averages 18. Ride quality difference in the 3500 is not discernibly different than the TrailBoss (and markedly improved over prior generations). And that’s with tires inflated at the recommended 60 front; 80 rear.

Yes, the Ecoboost certainly produces excellent power; but, there’s a reason it’s not offered in the Superduty - long term durability. Same reason GM didn’t simply drop the 6.2 (which produces Slightly more HP and slightly less TQ than the 6.6) in the HD (aluminum block versus cast iron, etc).

To dismiss the HD gasser (per one poster) seems myopic. Rather than maxing out a 1500, I’d much prefer to have more truck if towing anywhere near the limits of the 1500. Stronger motor (durability); stronger transmission; bigger brakes; load range E tires, etc. Likewise, if I were towing near the limits of the gasser routinely, the diesel would be preferable.

To suggest there’s no niche for a 2500/3500 gasser; and the choice should be either 1500 gas or 2500/3500 isn’t a position id agree with.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Very good info on the new tranny. Had no idea. 

 

L8T Enthusiast

L8T

Posted
Posted
On 3/2/2021 at 7:44 PM, TrailBoss1 said:


It’s similar to the transmission used in the 6.0; but significantly upgraded. Additional clutch packs and the torque converter transplanted from the Allison (with changes to the balancers because harmonics of the gas motor differ from the diesel).....


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Where did you get the info on the converter from? Everything I’ve read, including running part numbers suggest the converter is actually the same one found behind the 6.2 gas in various years.  
 

82A2CB99-D809-4B06-A8A8-E609D374943D.png

  • Like 1
TrailBoss1 Enthusiast

TrailBoss1

Posted
Posted

The Fast Lane produced a video in which they spoke with GM drivetrain engineer who explained this. Let me see if I can find the interview and post a link!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ray Pickle Enthusiast

Ray Pickle

Posted
Posted

If ecoboost was in a h.d  truck application longetivity would be a concern, thats why its not an option. Manufacturers engineers kinda know what they are doing most of the time. A gas engine 3/4 ton is superior to any half ton towing over 8000 ish pounds up to 14k range. And is very capable and a good option in that weight range instead of a diesel. 

  • Like 1
MacLaren Enthusiast

MacLaren

Posted
Posted

Man oh man, just drove mine home tonight.

Very, very, impressed! Was coming from a 2019 LT Z71 1500.  This 2500 is a Custom, with the Custom Value Package, Gooseneck/5th Wheel Package, Safety Convenience Package and Skid Plates. She isn't a smooth as my 1500 of course, but she ain't bad either!

Actually, I was worried about not having power seats, as I'm 5' 8" but, honestly it's perfect. And more interesting this seat is more comfy than the one in my 1500.  At any rate, the truck is as new as it can get. It just arrived by train from Flint, Michigan this Tuesday and at the dealership yesterday.  Build date was last month.  I am extremely happy thus far. 

Not as peppy as my 8 speed 1500, but still plenty of power! 

  • Like 2
MacLaren Enthusiast

MacLaren

Posted
Posted

Another thing, and please correct me if I'm wrong. This truck, having skid plates as an option from the factory could be classified as a Z71, correct? Isn't the main feature of the Z71 skid plates? I know 1500 has the bigger air filter I think but, what all exactly makes a 2500 a Z71 besides Skid Plates?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined

  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 635 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Grumpy Bear
      Some Assembly is Required

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • Chuck FB
      Software Update

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • nfisherman
      Software Update

      By nfisherman · Posted

      Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...