Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking at a stage 3, anyone with any reviews? It would be on my AT4, only looking for 1-2” of additional lift but want way better performance.

 

thanks!

Posted (edited)

They have become crazy expensive and service is non-existant. I had a 2009 1500 Sierra w/Icon's on it and it was great. I put them on 2 more Sierras after that (2018 1500 & 2500). Both of those vehicles had shocks that leaked (one after just a few miles plus it badly stained new pavers on my driveway). Icon would not send me a replacement shock on either incident. I had to actually drive up to the factory, wait a few hours to have it rebuilt and then drive the 2 hours back home. It was a real pain and could of been taken care of by pre-paying for a new shock and getting refunded when they received the faulty one back. 

 

I am a big fan of their billet adj. Delta Joint upper control arms. Never had an issue and the design is great. If you want to run OEM rims, you can do it w/most Icon UCA's.

 

I have Fox 2.5 DSC and this is now my 4th set. They have more adjustments than Icon CDC's that has only 10 settings (found myself often between setting on Icon rears). You can adjust High & Low speed compression with DSC. Also, Fox service is night and day difference from Icon. I found Icon has changed over the years... to big for their britches w/crazy pricing for unreliable products in my experience. 

 

NOTE: I owned a 2020 Tacoma I was building last year and noticed Icon had gone to a new way of locking their spring pre-load ring. No longer do they do a 2nd locking ring on top of the pre-load ring or even a pinch ring.... they use a single ring and the bolt actually digs INTO the shock threading. I ended up selling the Stage 10 kit to another Taco owner. And recently heard he ripped those shocks apart on his last 4WD trip... not good. 

 w/

 

Edited by EngLab
Posted

I have the Icon stage 2 kit on my 2020 Chevy 1500 LTZ. I have 3000 miles on the kit and love it. I also put Deaver Leaf packs in the back. But on the road it feels pretty nice. Dirt roads is where you really feel the difference. If you are not going to use your truck off road I would just go with the fox 2.0s. Also the amount of lift you get depends on what engine you have as well. I have the 3.0 and the icons lifted it around 2.5 inches. All the numbers they have are from the 5.3. 

Posted

anyone with the stage 1 experience. My elevation needs the oem 2" lift and for the price of the oem kit i was looking at Icon vs Bilstein. I was told Bilstein is great but a little harsh. considering it will never off road just a daily driver

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, bluemonstercali said:

anyone with the stage 1 experience. My elevation needs the oem 2" lift and for the price of the oem kit i was looking at Icon vs Bilstein. I was told Bilstein is great but a little harsh. considering it will never off road just a daily driver

Icon Stage One was the first kit I ever did on a 2009 Sierra 1500. It was great until the factory ball joints went out at after 20k miles w/spring pre-load/height being set at Icon's factory setting. Don't cheap out and get a decent aftermarket UCA w/whatever kit you do, your ball joints/tires will thank you. A good quality "adjustable" UCA will run over a grand, but worth it in savings down the road. Some people will disagree with this, but I personally never found a vehicle of mine (GM, Ford, Toyota, etc.) that didn't benefit on an alignment rack from aftermarket UCA's when installing coil-overs... even with a mild height increase.  

 

I agree with the statement about the Fox 2.0's being a good go-to shock for a mild daily driver. The only down side is they need to be fully removed from the vehicle to adjust spring pre-load because the adjustment ring is located at the bottom of the strut. If you are just going to leave them at the factory set height, then you don't have to worry about that 🙂

 

The Bilstein 5100 takes the guess work out of front ride height. You can find tons of info on here and around the Internet on any Bilstein product. Another newer option is the new Eibach Pro-Truck. They have copied the Bilstein 6112 idea and I have yet to read a negative review about them and the price point is unbeatable. 

Edited by EngLab
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I had the stage one kit on my 19 last year , it drove decent but still too firm. I sent the coilovers back, they converted em to stage 4. That's long travel with the compression adjuster. Huge difference..!!  Now the stage 4 has tubular control arms and rear reservoir adjustable compression shocks. Here's 3.25 up front and 2 rear with 35s.

 

20201011_091937.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted
On 6/27/2021 at 8:28 PM, Flatblack83 said:

I had the stage one kit on my 19 last year , it drove decent but still too firm. I sent the coilovers back, they converted em to stage 4. That's long travel with the compression adjuster. Huge difference..!!  Now the stage 4 has tubular control arms and rear reservoir adjustable compression shocks. Here's 3.25 up front and 2 rear with 35s.

 

20201011_091937.jpg

I'm putting the extended travel coilovers with the DSC in soon, what compression setting do you run on the road/highway? What about dirt?

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
On 9/12/2021 at 2:46 PM, Couper Harrison said:

I'm putting the extended travel coilovers with the DSC in soon, what compression setting do you run on the road/highway? What about dirt?

Been running them on  2 front and rear. I have them turned up to 3.5 up front so they tend to be firmer.

  • 3 years later...
Posted

This has been the worst, most expensive, and frustrating experience I’ve ever had! I spend $7,000 on a new stage 5 suspension kit that was installed by a professional mechanic. A little over a year and 7k miles (almost all of which were road miles) later everything I bought from Icon was leaking or had failed! This includes rear and upper control arms, delta joints, ball joints, seals, front coilovers/suspension, rear shocks I mean everything. They informed me the warranty was over and they would only rebuild the shocks as a courtesy. )I had to spend another $8,000 to replace the things that had broken because all of icons parts failed.) They told me it would take 3 to 5 days for the rebuild and them to send me back the shocks. Three and a half weeks later they sent the shocks to the wrong address, when my mechanic finally received them he informed me how disappointed in the quality of the rebuild he was. Said (I’ve never seen anything like them) Oil was still leaking from the shocks, seals had not been replaced and the bearings  were unusable. He informed me he could not put this suspension back on the vehicle due to safety and quality concerns. The mechanic had to send the suspension to his rebuild mechanic for an additional  at least $500. That’s $15,500 I am now into a $6,000 icon stage 5 suspension kit. John Quinn the icon manager or whatever he is wouldn’t not respond to my emails for days at a time and the only reason I was able to get the horribly rebuild suspension back in 3 weeks instead of heavens knows how long was because I had to call and complain to them every week about how long it was taking after they told me a it would take a week. Quality and service with this company is atrocious and I cannot recommend enough to stay as far away from Icon Vehicle Dynamics as possible. You’ll be broke and out of a car by the time you decide icon was the wrong decision. Seriously stay away from these guys. Ask anyone on Facebook or another forum and they will tell you the exact same thing. Wish I would have done more research before making this costly mistake. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I had an 88 K1500 with a 5.7 that had those symptoms, I know totally different, it ended up being the ECM. Once you get the fuel system fixed if it still runs lousy you may want to investigate that. it didn't set any codes, stalled ,ran rough at times etc
    • Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...