Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Long lurker, but first post. I’ve done quite a bit of educational reading here on many threads and wanted to inquire on something. 
 

I’m in the market for a 14-18 Silverado or Sierra 1500. Ironically, I have an opportunity to score a very nice, almost ridiculously nice, condition 2014 6.2 SLT with the max trailering package (3.73) and acceptably low mileage. It has almost all, minus a few not so important, options I’d like. 2014 is really the only way to get one of these trucks w/o getting the 8 speed, unless I’m mistaken, so between that, age/mileage, and certainly factoring in the max trailing pkg, such a combo is difficult to find. Plenty of options exist to get the big motor in 15-18 trucks with the 8 speed, with max t pkg if necessary. 
 

Now, I don’t know that I’d go so far as saying that I prefer the “smoothness” of the 6 speed relative to the 8 speed but in our Yukon XL SLT (5.3/6 speed), honestly it offers a rather pleasant city and highway driving experience lugging around the kids. Mind you, we aren’t racing it with the kiddos onboard. It’s not quick, by any means, but it does the job.  I’d want more in a truck, thus the 6.2 thinking. Now, I’ve driven 5.3 + 8 speed combos and other non GM > 6 speeds, and they always feel jerky to me when doing simple cruising around town. I don’t feel it matters much on the highway, honestly. At elevated speeds, the feel difference is minimal IMO. I have NOT driven a 6.2/8 speed….yet. 
 

The general consensus in my reading here is that the 3.73 ratio in the 6 speed really makes the 6.2 come alive - several threads about towing (which I don’t do a lot of), quickness/fun-ness (important to me), etc. In addition, one might even say some feel the 8 speed should be avoided, others say just jump to the 10 speed. Opinions vary.
 

My question is, given the 8L90 issues, short lifespan relatively, etc does it make any sense to specifically consider an “older” 6.2/6L80/3.73 vs a 2015-2018 6.2/8L90 combo?  Or have a lost my mind completely due to information overload?  My primary concern is long term durability/reliability. Obviously, I don’t want a train wreck, and first year roll outs in a series always make me a little nervous even though the truck in question literally has been near flawless across its life. 
 

Curious what you connoisseurs and those having more experience in all these combos might do here - consider the 6.2/6L80/3.73 purchase, re-focus on a 6.2/8L90 - with or w/o NHT (I think is the code), or sit tight until a 6.2/10’s come into my budget a year or so from now? 
 

 

Posted

Diff ratios used on 8 speed are different that 6 speed.

 

I think you find that the overall ratio (trans and diff) with the 8 speed gives a lower low and a higher high than the 6 speed. 

 

Same deal with the max tow (NHT versions) which has higher (numerically) ratio diff's.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

My 14 (non max tow package) had the 3.42 6 speed, very quick truck off the line, and held RPM's a little higher, not as much 'lugging" at lower speeds.

 

The 16 I had, and now my 18 have/had the 3.23 8 speeds. Both have been very good, but takes a little more "motivation" to get them going at the same pace as my 14. Better MPG's with the 8 speeds, and tow just fine.

 

If you are looking at K2's, would really consider an 18, seems like it was the year they finally got most of the bugs worked out IMO.

  • Like 1
Posted

I posted a gear ratio spread sheet a while back comparing the 6 speed with 3.73's to the 8 and 10 speed  with the 3.23's and the 8 and 10 speed had "lower lowers and higher highs" as posted above.  The key though isn't how "low" the overall gear is, its how long the truck stays in that gear range and the 8spd and 10spd manage to operate in the lower gear ratio parameters for a longer duration than the 6 speed which in turn allows the vehicle to pull harder for longer even though the rear gear ratio is taller.  I'll see if I can find my spread sheet and post it again.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 Spd Auto Gearing (X:1)   4 Hi Final Ratios 4 Lo Final Ratios
1 4.03   15.03 40.44
2 2.36   8.80 23.68
3 1.53   5.71 15.35
4 1.15   4.29 11.54
5 0.85   3.17 8.53
6 0.67   2.50 6.72
         
         
Reverse 3.06   11.41 30.70
         
Axle Ratio 3.73   Crawl Gear Ratio (X:1)  
      40.44  
Transfer Case        
4 Hi 1      
4 Lo 2.69    

 

 

 

 

 

8 Spd Auto Gearing (X:1)   4 Hi Final Ratios 4 Lo Final Ratios
1 4.56   14.73 39.62
2 2.97   9.59 25.81
3 2.08   6.72 18.07
4 1.69   5.46 14.68
5 1.27   4.10 11.03
6 1   3.23 8.69
7 0.85   2.75 7.39
8 0.65   2.10 5.65
Reverse 4.86   15.70 42.23
         
Axle Ratio 3.23   Crawl Gear Ratio (X:1)
      39.62  
Transfer Case        
4 Hi 1      
4 Lo 2.69      

 

 

 

 

10 Spd Auto Gearing (X:1)   4 Hi Final Ratios 4 Lo Final Ratios
1 4.7   15.18 40.84
2 2.99   9.66 25.98
3 2.15   6.94 18.68
4 1.8   5.81 15.64
5 1.52   4.91 13.21
6 1.28   4.13 11.12
7 1   3.23 8.69
8 0.85   2.75 7.39
9 0.69   2.23 6.00
10 0.64   2.07 5.56
Reverse 4.87   15.73 42.31
         
Axle Ratio 3.23   Crawl Gear Ratio (X:1)
      40.84  
Transfer Case        
4 Hi 1      
4 Lo 2.69      
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Those are based on my own calculations from materials I have reviewed.  The reverse gear ratios would need to be validated.

 

Basically, the 8 speed and 10 speed transmissions do everything better, from top to bottom, even when the 6 spd is paired with the 3.73's.  If you pair the 6L80 with 3.42's or 3.23's then the 6l80 is not even remotely close.  The only real question would come down to reliability in which case the early 8 speeds did have issues but those same issues seem to be resolved in the newer models.  I have not had a single hiccup from my 2020 8-spd and I have 45k miles on it.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

if you can score a clean truck pre-2017 get that sona-******, , the computer are easier to access and tune.

i know the tuners like the 8 speed because it can handle over 1000hp, but cost is not friendly for the home tuner. tcm unlocks $$$ the 8 speed can shift faster, but has way more rotational mass which robs you of power transfer.

 

6l80/90 is the way to go if you want tuning on a budget, the 2500 trucks is the best 6 speed, its built stronger as a 6L90.

Edited by pokismoki
Posted (edited)
On 10/15/2021 at 7:51 PM, tdc5152 said:

Long lurker, but first post. I’ve done quite a bit of educational reading here on many threads and wanted to inquire on something. 
 

The general consensus in my reading here is that the 3.73 ratio in the 6 speed really makes the 6.2 come alive - several threads about towing (which I don’t do a lot of), quickness/fun-ness (important to me), etc. In addition, one might even say some feel the 8 speed should be avoided, others say just jump to the 10 speed. Opinions vary.
 

My question is, given the 8L90 issues, short lifespan relatively, etc does it make any sense to specifically consider an “older” 6.2/6L80/3.73 vs a 2015-2018 6.2/8L90 combo?  Or have a lost my mind completely due to information overload?  My primary concern is long term durability/reliability. Obviously, I don’t want a train wreck, and first year roll outs in a series always make me a little nervous even though the truck in question literally has been near flawless across its life. 
 

Curious what you connoisseurs and those having more experience in all these combos might do here - consider the 6.2/6L80/3.73 purchase, re-focus on a 6.2/8L90 - with or w/o NHT (I think is the code), or sit tight until a 6.2/10’s come into my budget a year or so from now? 
 

 

 

 

6L80 has a higher issue rate than the 8L90, at least where I work.  All day long.  I've lost track on how many 6L torque converters we've done, on how many got fluid pumps and some internals, on 4-5-6 clutch failures, entire transmission replacements because so much converter clutch material an metal went through them.

 

8L90 I would go 2018+newer.  If it hasn't had the fluid swapped out for shudder that would be the first thing to do.  Some of the funky shifts can be settled out by making that specific gear change like 15-20 times at the throttle % it does it.  Helps to learn that clutch/gear change.  So say you have a funky 2-3 shift, pop it into manual mode and make a bunch of 2-3 shifts.

 

As far as how they run/drive.  I'm on my 4th 6L.  I love them for the most part, but 8L and 10L drive sooo much better, especially the 8L in the T1 new trucks.  They tightened up the shift calibrations and tuning much better.  

 

3.73/6speed vs 3.42/8speed.  The 3.42/8speed would have even more gear multiplication throughout 1-4th or 5th gears.  8 speed lets the engine sit in the HP and or TQ bands better.  Watch some of the Ike Gauntlet videos on TFL truck.  Yes, the test is a more extreme test and and high elevation, but you can see where some of the GM 6 speeds fall short of the 8 and 10 speed trucks.  6 speed can get stuck in a lugging zone and start to fall off RPMs and out of the meat of the power range.  Even with 4.10s.  

 

6.2 8 speed NHT 3.42

2017 Chevy Silverado 1500 6.2L V8 vs Ike Gauntlet Review: World's Toughest Towing Test - YouTube

 

6.0 HD 6 speed 4.10

2015 Chevy Silverado 2500 takes on the Grueling Ike Gauntlet HD Towing Test - YouTube

 

6.6 new gas HD 6 speed 3.73

The New 2020 Chevy Silverado HD Gasser Broke Our Ike Gauntlet Scoring System - Here Is How! - YouTube

 

I know there is weight differences in the videos above, but you can still see how the two HD trucks get put in strange positions during the pull.  The switch DOWN to 3.73s in the 2020+HD was a mistake as well.  That truck needs the 10 speed all day long with those 3.73s.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Sorry all.  I've been away on business for a bit.  

 

Thank you for all your input.  This clarifies a lot of question marks I had.  Now it's time to take a few different configurations for a spin and complete the "feel" evaluation.  

 

Besides, the used car value/market is completely out of control (high) at the moment, so exercising a little patience is probably a good idea honestly.

 

Thanks again.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 10/29/2021 at 7:35 AM, pokismoki said:

wow, on the 10 speed that 1st (4.7)gear transition to 2nd (2.99)gear must be an annoying shift

Nope.  Not at all. 

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Transient said:

Nope.  Not at all. 

Agreed. 

Behind the 3.0 it is buttery smooth. 

 

(is that a technical description??)

Edited by redwngr
Posted (edited)

It's too bad we won't get to see a 12 speed. Four or Five overdrive gears would have been great on the highway.

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted (edited)

Interesting fact. A lot of people complain about the gearing being so low compared to competitors. But if you pick the correct (Taller tire) for your application you can reduce your 0-60 mph etc.

 

For ex. I put on slightly larger tires changing the axle ratio to 3.19 from 3.23. I know, small change. But enough that it now shift's just after 60mph and the 1/4 mile making better time. A lot of factors in this. But if you're traction limited a taller tire could be the way to go. 

 

That is, if you use trucks for things they weren't intended for 😜

 

And taller tire's cover more ground. Less rpm for distance traveled so.. quicker at higher speeds

Edited by M1ck3y
Posted
6 hours ago, redwngr said:

Agreed. 

Behind the 3.0 it is buttery smooth. 

 

(is that a technical description??)

I have the 6.2.  That's 2 engines with the same trans both agreeing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 469 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
    • Take an automotive stethoscope to the vacuum pump. Iirc those tick as well. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...