Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I imagine your winter ( which is probably more like our normal summer temps ) would be kinder to the temps or at least control it better. In reading about humidity I haven't come across proper information to say one way or the other if its a net negative or positive on engine temperature but it has effects with the actual air density as in decreasing air density with high humidity and the obvious which is your high ambient temperatures are not where its at for cooling, or power for that matter. 

 

Oddly the 3.0 diesel from what I am seeing on a mechanics videos is set up to have stupid high trans temps at a minimum as well, yet the gas counterpart half ton is designed to run a lot cooler when driving empty. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me why they are doing that but GM must have their reasons ... or its EPA pushing them. 

 

If your able to get 14 at what I assume is still a fair pace down the highway, that's all one can expect from a gasoline truck with the shape of a brick. Only by going slower and a consistent speed and no head wind etc can one get into some better numbers. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Truston Gunter said:

I'm pretty sure the "best" was downhill with the wind at my back!!! lol 12-14 is what I usually get on the highway unloaded

That’s because you drive 80+ all the time which I believe you stated a couple of times in the past. The difference between 70 and 80 is massive for these trucks. There is no speed limit over 70 near me so I’ve only hit 80 on very few occasions. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, BuckWallace said:

Pretty much any time I'm over 65 I noticed the MPG hit, especially when towing.

It takes exponentially more power and wind resistance to push a big brick through the air as you go faster. Add in a head wind and it can change things quickly. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Pryme said:

It takes exponentially more power and wind resistance to push a big brick through the air as you go faster. Add in a head wind and it can change things quickly. 

So your saying I should put a hitch on my vette to take advantage of the aerodynamics for towing........

  • Haha 2
Posted
53 minutes ago, Truston Gunter said:

So your saying I should put a hitch on my vette to take advantage of the aerodynamics for towing........

That’s why I pull a fifth wheel with my motorcycle that has one horsepower for every 3.3 pounds of bike weight. Moves it super nice ha

  • 7 months later...
Posted
16 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

Was this created by GM?! Just kidding, but this is interesting. I change my oil every 5k miles or 6 months (I don't put a ton of miles on my truck), and I hadn't had any noticeable consumption on my 2024 L8T until this last oil change at a little under 25k miles. This OCI was about 4500 miles and I lost about 1/2-3/4 of a quart, so well within this "normal" consumption range. I was a little bummed to see that much gone since I hadn't noticed any loss before, but I'm not going to worry too much about it.

Posted
5 hours ago, BuckWallace said:

Was this created by GM?! Just kidding, but this is interesting. I change my oil every 5k miles or 6 months (I don't put a ton of miles on my truck), and I hadn't had any noticeable consumption on my 2024 L8T until this last oil change at a little under 25k miles. This OCI was about 4500 miles and I lost about 1/2-3/4 of a quart, so well within this "normal" consumption range. I was a little bummed to see that much gone since I hadn't noticed any loss before, but I'm not going to worry too much about it.

 

If I had a L8T that used nothing for 25K then just starts using a quart in 4,500 I'd be thinking either PCV system has got an issue or the oil control ring drains in the piston are starting to plug. Valvoline Restore and Protect will bring it around if it's rings and it just might be. It could take another 20K to clear them. 4 changes at 5K each. But should see results within the first two. 

Posted

The comment about this article created by GM was spot on!!! lol I still have the same issue/experience. I can positively say in my situation, the oil consumption I experience is directly related to my towing. I still try to drive the speed limit on the interstate where there is minimum traffic and the truck does not like it! With wind I sometimes get 4 MPG!!!!!!! oddly enough, if I tow a utility trailer that weighs almost 10K versus my camper which is only 7K and the difference is huge! Guess that wind sail makes all the difference.  Happy towing everyone!!!!

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Truston Gunter said:

The comment about this article created by GM was spot on!!! lol I still have the same issue/experience. I can positively say in my situation, the oil consumption I experience is directly related to my towing. I still try to drive the speed limit on the interstate where there is minimum traffic and the truck does not like it! With wind I sometimes get 4 MPG!!!!!!! oddly enough, if I tow a utility trailer that weighs almost 10K versus my camper which is only 7K and the difference is huge! Guess that wind sail makes all the difference.  Happy towing everyone!!!!

 

Wind is the biggest factor in my mileage hauling my truck camper! However, I've never seen a change in oil consumption while hauling it in thirteen years (6.0 gasser). 

Posted

Common Sense tells me something is Wrong.  GM will put Bulletins and point fingers, just like the Denial of afm Distroying my engine on a 2018 6.2l.

I'm old school, the Only Time you should need to add Oil is if your way over Oil changes or way over working an engine but pulling a 7500 pound trailer is not it.

I know it says at 7500 miles oil change, but heck it could say 10,000 miles if GM wanted to convince people, but I change around 5000 miles even though it has become very expensive.

Really like this 6.6l gas, but if people are using oil, especially 2 quarts, GM has a problem and they need to figure it out before it becomes another recall.

Just my 2 cents,

Later- 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Pepper has 192,000 on her and doesn't use between 5K changes. Recently I've shortened that OCI to 3,750 in response to new formulations of lower TBN and ever lower AW packages. I also don't run 0W20 in anything. 

 

I didn't put the link up because I agree but rather to give others a 'gauge' of what to expect from their OEM's lack of response to their inquiries. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I wonder how the EPA concluded that burning 1 quart of oil per 1,000 miles—so about 5 quarts over a typical oil change interval—creates less pollution than the fuel savings from their specifications and restrictions. I’m no engineer, but 5 quarts of oil burned and released into the atmosphere by 500,000 trucks doesn’t seem much better than a small increase in fuel consumption.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, James Beyer said:

Common Sense tells me something is Wrong.  GM will put Bulletins and point fingers, just like the Denial of afm Distroying my engine on a 2018 6.2l.

I'm old school, the Only Time you should need to add Oil is if your way over Oil changes or way over working an engine but pulling a 7500 pound trailer is not it.

I know it says at 7500 miles oil change, but heck it could say 10,000 miles if GM wanted to convince people, but I change around 5000 miles even though it has become very expensive.

Really like this 6.6l gas, but if people are using oil, especially 2 quarts, GM has a problem and they need to figure it out before it becomes another recall.

Just my 2 cents,

Later- 

 

I don’t like cylinder deactivation. My odyssey has it. It is on way longer than my GM was. I got it from my daughter by trading my mother in law’s CRV for it. She went by the minder. I did several quick oil changes and do 5K oil changes. At 166K I can’t tell except for the light it’s on. With a lite foot I get 25 MPG in town. Same at 72 MPH on the Hwy. My brother in law with his 2013 Tahoe at 180K with 5K oil changes has no issues. Both of us will keep them until they die. They ain’t worth much. Except to us. 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...