Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Could we FINALLY get our supercharged V8's from GM? Will it be just SUV excluded, or maybe just Cadillac excluded? I would love to see this happen across the suv and truck lineup. 

 

 

Here is the article 

 

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2022/01/cadillac-escalade-v-accelerates-sounds-like-a-beast-with-lt4-v8-power-video/

Posted
19 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

Could we FINALLY get our supercharged V8's from GM? Will it be just SUV excluded, or maybe just Cadillac excluded? I would love to see this happen across the suv and truck lineup. 

 

 

Here is the article 

 

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2022/01/cadillac-escalade-v-accelerates-sounds-like-a-beast-with-lt4-v8-power-video/

I was always messing around trying to get enhanced performance out of trucks since the 70s, supercharger included. Finally when buying my 14 5.3 E-85 Texas Edition with the 345 gear I was satisfied. The only hand held tune adjustment I made were to the transmission and eliminating the cylinder deactivation. Most any hard acceleration would activate the traction control. No complaints in that department. The problem I can see with GMs added a S/C option is all the other expensive add ons they would throw in. If inclined I would farm the supercharger install to my favorite shop. The money I’d save would pay any potential warranty refuses for the aftermarket install. A lesson learned.

  • Like 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, KARNUT said:

I was always messing around trying to get enhanced performance out of trucks since the 70s, supercharger included. Finally when buying my 14 5.3 E-85 Texas Edition with the 345 gear I was satisfied. The only hand held tune adjustment I made were to the transmission and eliminating the cylinder deactivation. Most any hard acceleration would activate the traction control. No complaints in that department. The problem I can see with GMs added a S/C option is all the other expensive add ons they would throw in. If inclined I would farm the supercharger install to my favorite shop. The money I’d save would pay any potential warranty refuses for the aftermarket install. A lesson learned.

The advantage I see is that if GM does do this, its set-up the right way from factory, plus it has a warranty with it. From what I have read, the new 10 speed is still unlockable/can't be reprogrammed yet??  Don't quote me, but if/when it comes from factory, all of those little gremlins are taken care of by GM. 

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, TNTSilverado said:

The advantage I see is that if GM does do this, its set-up the right way from factory, plus it has a warranty with it. From what I have read, the new 10 speed is still unlockable/can't be reprogrammed yet??  Don't quote me, but if/when it comes from factory, all of those little gremlins are taken care of by GM. 

One of the few reasons why I didn’t S/C my 14 sold it and kept my stroked, blown 92 until recently. If so inclined my Avalanche would be next inline. Or maybe a pre 06 2door. I don’t like to waste money on achieving results with the constraints of the manufacturers. 

Posted (edited)

Hope so , even if its just for the Escalade.  

They need a flag ship V or whatever they call it model to compete with the BMW X7/GLE/Range Rover  Etc. 

 

You know damn well it will sell. If someone will pay 100k+ for one now , another 20-25k is nothing to them. 

About time! Why not the exact set up out of the CT5 V ?  668HP please :)

Edited by f8l vnm
  • Like 2
Posted

Yes, 668HP is nice, but let's just skip the nonsense and put the LT5 into all of them and get 755HP!!  We both know that sounds so much more enticing!!!  Claiming 755HP with a Corvette ZR1 motor would most definitely get people into the dealerships and looking at them, if not signing their names on the lines. 

  • Like 3
Posted
1 hour ago, TNTSilverado said:

Yes, 668HP is nice, but let's just skip the nonsense and put the LT5 into all of them and get 755HP!!  We both know that sounds so much more enticing!!!  Claiming 755HP with a Corvette ZR1 motor would most definitely get people into the dealerships and looking at them, if not signing their names on the lines. 

 

If Dodge/Fiat/Stillantis can give every damn thing in their lineup a 700+ HP motor , i agree why not get LT5 ? At worse you can rate it at 700 .. IT WILL SELL! People who buy these cars dont care about a 1-2k car payment. Probably a write off anyway. 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Cmon Mary! Sack up! Grab your man balls and lets do this 

Edited by f8l vnm
  • Haha 2
Posted
48 minutes ago, f8l vnm said:

Cmon Mary! Sack up! Grab your man balls and lets do this 

Don't count on Mary, when it comes to the bowties all she sees is chEVrolet. John deLorean barely slipped the GTO past Ed Cole, Mary would have de-nutted him.

  • Haha 3
Posted

We do a ton of (marine mostly) Whipple installs where I work. There are hardly any downsides to a supercharged engine these days. They really run flawless. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, TeamSaris said:

We do a ton of (marine mostly) Whipple installs where I work. There are hardly any downsides to a supercharged engine these days. They really run flawless. 

I totally agree!  My best friend and son’s godfather has a LS3 supercharged Avalanche, a fully built LSA ZL1, a Supercharged Range Rover, and supercharged Kawasaki jet ski. Everything he owns and has owned has been/ is basically supercharged. They have ran flawless for him except the 03 Denali with the older style Whipple. It had bearing issues with it 2 times. The newer ones have been great. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Black02Silverado said:

Heck, why stop there, lets just shoot for a cool 1,000whp!

Lol. The more the better, realistically 755 HP is already been achieved and was a beast in the ZR1 Corvette. It’s proven, reliable, been through all the development stages/R&D, and is right their in GMs portfolio.  Kinda cost effective if you think of it. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I like my aftermarket upgrades. I don't wanna pay registration and property taxes on a supercharger if I can help it. You know they will make it part of some half cocked expensive upgrade package, too- like you can't get it without track mode (glorified DOD and TC disable), accent lighting, black side mirrors, and "Z##" wheels or something. It might be a $15k+ package and maybe half of it you won't even want. Those kinds of things are more frustrating than exciting for me when comparing new vehicles and prices.

That said, Chevy needs a hot truck in their lineup. LT4 6.2 would do it, 650HP factory would be easy and tuneable. Could maybe use ZL1 parts as well. They would probably have to work out a tranny that would go 100k worth of launching a 2.5 ton vehicle though. Maybe some weight reduction and a 10L90, but still a tall order I think. With all the recalls I hope they are making conscious decisions to better proof their "good ideas" these days in any case.

I think they should have done a RWD LT4 supercharged Malibu, but hey I like not having a car payment on the other hand.

  • Like 1
Posted

With the EV Silverado , its hard for me to see them doing a LT4 hot rod truck.  And that's disappointing because we already know they have the engine. I mean if the new ZR2 gets the same 6.2 as every other high trim, should be our indication  . 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • While waiting for parts I have been working on installing the AC compressor, new accumulator, and orifice tube. Also changed out the high side ball valve (original). The orifice tube that was in there wasn't too bad. Slightly dirty, a little bit of junk, but not blocked. Glad I changed it out.   The accumulator, which should have been a 5 minute job, may have just burned $50. Put some PAG in it, wrote the date and mileage on the side, fresh o-rings and gooey'd up the threads and rings with Nylog. Got everything connected and snugged and was going to vacuum down the system, and....   My manifold gauge won't fit on the port. It's not an R12 service port. It LOOKS like an R134 service port but the diameter is a hair too large. There's a sticker on the accumulator that says it's designed to be used with R12 and R134a systems only. So it's not R1234yf. Even if I reduced the diameter slightly with a file, the shoulder on the port is too large so the quick-connect valve won't lock on. I'm stumped. It's going back, and 50/50 on if they'll give me a refund.   Also, I did a fuel pressure test.... Key on, the gauge spikes to about 60psi and quickly bleeds off, like 2psi per second. The fuel isn't going into the plenum, no smell, starts fine, so I'm guessing there's a bad check valve in the pump and the fuel is just draining back into the tank. oh, hell. But, it shouldn't be a problem, pump primes just fine and the truck starts right up. It just means I can't really ever use fuel pressure to verify a leak at the injector or intake.
    • Got this yesterday out of nowhere. Truck is a 25',6.6 gasser with 8k miles.  Only semi anomaly is that the truck had been sitting, uncranked for 6 days. Elec Stability Control showed immediately upon cranking, not while driving. No drivability issues, just the message. Battery didn't seem to be weak when cranking over.  I drove it, killed it, let it sit a few hrs with no avail.  Truck is 100% stock. No damage. 
    • This can be done.  It is not cheap and requires an instrument cluster swap with custom programming, new steering wheel with the controls on it, and a special jumper harness.   The cluster upgrade - 12.3” Digital Cluster Upgrade – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The wheel upgrade - Steering Wheel Upgrade Kit – 2022.5–2026 Silverado / Sierra (T1 Refresh Pickup) - WAMS   The column harness upgrade - 2019 - 2026 Silverado / Sierra: Steering Wheel LIN Bus Harness - Harness Dr. - DIY Done Right     The problem with doing all of this?  You pretty much can't have any programming done to your truck that involves the cluster ever again.  The dealer won't be able to program the cluster as GM's system will only pull data for the cluster the truck came with.  So it would be advised also to turn off over the air updates.   TLDR;  Should have bought an LT double cab?  You'd have a power seat, the wheel controls, the cluster, all things that you've been seeking in your various posts so far about your new WT regular cab.  
    • I was unaware of that, thanks for updating me.
    • Yes.  The 2.7 Turbomax has Active Fuel Management.  It is NOT the same as the V8s.  Totally different system.     Here is an article from GM when the 2.7 came out explaining the cylinder deactivation and the valve lift system.  Starts at the section called "SCS Valvetrain":   New Turbocharged 2.7L 4-Cylinder Engine Powers Full-Size Trucks – TechLink         This is an internet myth going around.  It was alleged that some 5.3s had this mystical 8th digit of the VIN as an "E" which somehow meant it had a new one year only 5.3 that didn't have DFM.  The writer of said article and the person that made the claim conveniently can't count because they posted the VIN.  The 8th digit was a "D" which meant its still the 5.3 with DFM.  The 9th digit of the VIN was an "E" and the 9th digit isn't the engine code.  At all.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...