Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My kit should be here on Thursday and plan on having it installed on Friday. From all the reading and what not I have done, it looks like they do not recommend going over the second slot. However, the second slot only adds 1.9" with springs. This wont quite level my truck as the rear measures at 33 1/4" and the front measures 31 3/4". There will still be about half an inch difference between the fronts and rears. How noticeable will that be? Thanks.

Posted

Hello. I had my mechanic install the shocks and coils. I only leveled my truck. I do know my mechanic set the clip all the way to top in terms of setting minimum/maximum height. I purchased 275/65/R20's Falken Wilpeak, which drive fine, no real noise. and did get 1" from that alone. 

I hope this helps.

Posted

Here is mine with recommended settings, also the rear shocks and 2in block from RC. Same set up as Trail Boss.

 

Self install was super easy and saves money if you are able to do yourself.

 

Mine is level and the ride quality is night and day difference!

 

I installed some Kenda Klever AT2s.20211108_170417.thumb.jpg.74d2e955fcc9db8e580c76b5744b691a.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Yours is level after you added the 2" rear block? Looking at the instructions, it only adds 1.9" with springs on the recommended settings. Kinda confused how yours leveled out after added more to the rear.

Posted

Kit is installed. Looks pretty nice but I am surprised the measurements around all four corners did not remain even. Each corner is now measuring something slightly different. Drivers rear is a bit over 34", passenger rear is about 1/8" under 34", drivers front is about 1/8" under 34 and the passenger from is 1/4" under 34. I guess the only one that really bothers me is the passenger front being 1/4" lower. Its only an 1/8" vs the other side but more than 1/4 vs the drivers rear. Would this be considered normal and nothing to worry about or is something incorrect?

Posted (edited)

Drive it around hard and I bet you’ll see the numbers change. 
 

Driver’s side is often set a little higher due to the vehicle ALWAYS having a driver on that side. 

Edited by AJMBLAZER
  • Like 1
Posted

Ahh, didnt think about that. Makes sense. Is it going to hurt anything that it went slightly over 2" in the fronts? Seems everyone says anything over 2 will damage the UCAs.

Posted

Is there a sign when one starts going bad? Never had to deal with it before lol. I do love the way she looks though lol.

Posted
On 2/12/2022 at 12:10 PM, Byrds8 said:

Kit is installed. Looks pretty nice but I am surprised the measurements around all four corners did not remain even. Each corner is now measuring something slightly different. Drivers rear is a bit over 34", passenger rear is about 1/8" under 34", drivers front is about 1/8" under 34 and the passenger from is 1/4" under 34. I guess the only one that really bothers me is the passenger front being 1/4" lower. Its only an 1/8" vs the other side but more than 1/4 vs the drivers rear. Would this be considered normal and nothing to worry about or is something incorrect?


I think you’re looking at it with too much scrutiny. It doesn’t matter. 

Posted

Ill get some when I walk out from work this afternoon and try to post them tonight.

Posted
On 2/13/2022 at 11:33 AM, Byrds8 said:

Is there a sign when one starts going bad? Never had to deal with it before lol. I do love the way she looks though lol.

Eibachs are very robust shocks and I doubt they will go bad before you sell the truck.  I believe there is a million mile warranty or something crazy like that, but I dont know if it is for factory related defects or more.  I've had mine on for 30K miles and they feel like they did the first day I installed them. 

 

As far as what it will feel like when they go bad, my factory Rancho shocks were shot at 20K and the truck "porpoised" over bumps in the road.  Another description would be "Pontooning" where the front end continues to rise and fall for a period of time after going over humps, speed bumps, etc.  When I removed the shocks there was an oily residue on the shock shaft and dirt and grime residue surrounding the orifice of the shock housing.

 

Dont worry about your measurements being off, the suspension will settle and things will start to line up.  No matter what shock or suspension package you go with though, all four corners will RARELY be spot on so expect to see variances in height.  Also, make sure all tire pressures are even before taking measurements.

 

Congrats on the setup, its a quality suspension system and if you ever tow or go off-road driving you will notice a HUGE difference over the factory suspension.

Posted

Thanks Gangly. However, I meant what are the signs of an UCA going bad. I remember seeing the million mile warranty for the shocks. Its one of the reasons why I went with them. Ill never need another set until the warranty is gone on the truck and I have a 6" lift put on it.

 

The Ranchos definitely sucked. Was the absolute worse ride without having a bad shock that I have ever had. Not sure why they even bother using that garbage. I had to go over speed bumps every day going to work so know exactly what you mean by continuing on to bounce.

 

Kinda figured it would settle but always good to be sure. As for measurements, you never want to measure from the ground, you always want to measure from the bottom of the wheel. The wheel to the fender is pretty constant where the ground to the fender can change due to pressures uneven pavement etc.

 

Thanks. So far I am enjoying its stance. The ride itself only improved.

IMG_2835.thumb.JPG.59f85dc5630482dcf86170f1bdcad251.JPG

IMG_2836.thumb.JPG.7343512d0a183aeb86a4bf2f4188c257.JPG

Posted
2 hours ago, Byrds8 said:

Thanks Gangly. However, I meant what are the signs of an UCA going bad. I remember seeing the million mile warranty for the shocks. Its one of the reasons why I went with them. Ill never need another set until the warranty is gone on the truck and I have a 6" lift put on it.

 

The Ranchos definitely sucked. Was the absolute worse ride without having a bad shock that I have ever had. Not sure why they even bother using that garbage. I had to go over speed bumps every day going to work so know exactly what you mean by continuing on to bounce.

 

Kinda figured it would settle but always good to be sure. As for measurements, you never want to measure from the ground, you always want to measure from the bottom of the wheel. The wheel to the fender is pretty constant where the ground to the fender can change due to pressures uneven pavement etc.

 

Thanks. So far I am enjoying its stance. The ride itself only improved.

IMG_2835.thumb.JPG.59f85dc5630482dcf86170f1bdcad251.JPG

IMG_2836.thumb.JPG.7343512d0a183aeb86a4bf2f4188c257.JPG

 

Looks good. Did you go with stage 1 or stage 2? How was the installation if you did it yourself?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...