Jump to content

2021 lifter failure - post mortem

Nomad24
 Share

Recommended Posts

Nomad24 Enthusiast

Nomad24

Posted
Posted (edited)

My 2021 trail boss is in the shop right now for lifter failure at 15k miles. I’ve seen several posts about the same failure and I’m curious if anyone can share how their truck is running now? How many miles have you put on your truck since the repair and have you had any additional issues?A499FDEA-376F-4CEC-9A3A-EC89BB8CF766.thumb.jpeg.f816191c7f28c72b3c5d3f1e03cc81ad.jpeg

Edited by Nomad24
Typo
  • Sad 1
voided3 Enthusiast

voided3

Posted
Posted

Our '21 Silverado with L84 5.3 got the first flashing check engine light at 585 miles. The dealer replaced the lifters only on cylinders #6 and #8 after several visits (the light came back four times in total) around 1800 miles.

 

The truck is now at about 12,500 miles and the issue hasn't come back yet, but 1) I change the oil every 3,000 miles as a preventative measure, and 2) I exclusively drive the truck in L7 on the 8-speed to disable DFM. Despite these measures, I wouldn't be surprised if it happened again given only four out of 16 lifters were replaced.

 

I've mentioned this in other DFM lifter threads, too, but if they remove your serpentine belt for any reason as part of the repair, have them replace it. Ours started failing at 6300 miles because they took it off twice and stretch fit belts are one-time use. They replaced the serpentine belt, AC belt, and idler pulley on ours under warranty. Also make sure they clip your heater hoses back into place. They didn't on ours and I had to clip one back in its retainer so it wouldn't rub on the frame and squeak going over bumps.

 

Even without the manufacturing defect that affected our batch of engines, the lifters will most likely fail between 60,000 and 80,000 miles under normal use, anyway, due to the poor design. If you are not leasing the truck, I would plan on trading it before the 5 year/60,000 mile powertrain warranty is up or get an extended warranty if you hope to keep it longer. We negotiated an extended component coverage (6 years/100,000 miles) letter for the engine on ours that's tied to the VIN number due to the terrible, dragged out repair experience we had with ours over the course of a few months. It's at minimum a $5,000 job out of warranty to get the lifters replaced at the dealer, and if it takes out the whole engine due to metal debris recirculating, it can be as much as $11,000-12,000 for a new engine.

 

With all of that said, we plan on trading in the truck later this year. We use it to tow a modestly sized 4,000 lbs. GVWR camper and I can't deal with a practically brand new truck randomly failing in the middle of nowhere hours from home. No amount of warranty coverage will make you any less screwed in that scenario.

  • Like 1
Nomad24 Enthusiast

Nomad24

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 hours ago, voided3 said:

Our '21 Silverado with L84 5.3 got the first flashing check engine light at 585 miles. The dealer replaced the lifters only on cylinders #6 and #8 after several visits (the light came back four times in total) around 1800 miles.

 

The truck is now at about 12,500 miles and the issue hasn't come back yet, but 1) I change the oil every 3,000 miles as a preventative measure, and 2) I exclusively drive the truck in L7 on the 8-speed to disable DFM. Despite these measures, I wouldn't be surprised if it happened again given only four out of 16 lifters were replaced.

 

I've mentioned this in other DFM lifter threads, too, but if they remove your serpentine belt for any reason as part of the repair, have them replace it. Ours started failing at 6300 miles because they took it off twice and stretch fit belts are one-time use. They replaced the serpentine belt, AC belt, and idler pulley on ours under warranty. Also make sure they clip your heater hoses back into place. They didn't on ours and I had to clip one back in its retainer so it wouldn't rub on the frame and squeak going over bumps.

 

Even without the manufacturing defect that affected our batch of engines, the lifters will most likely fail between 60,000 and 80,000 miles under normal use, anyway, due to the poor design. If you are not leasing the truck, I would plan on trading it before the 5 year/60,000 mile powertrain warranty is up or get an extended warranty if you hope to keep it longer. We negotiated an extended component coverage (6 years/100,000 miles) letter for the engine on ours that's tied to the VIN number due to the terrible, dragged out repair experience we had with ours over the course of a few months. It's at minimum a $5,000 job out of warranty to get the lifters replaced at the dealer, and if it takes out the whole engine due to metal debris recirculating, it can be as much as $11,000-12,000 for a new engine.

 

With all of that said, we plan on trading in the truck later this year. We use it to tow a modestly sized 4,000 lbs. GVWR camper and I can't deal with a practically brand new truck randomly failing in the middle of nowhere hours from home. No amount of warranty coverage will make you any less screwed in that scenario.

Thanks for the information, all good advice! We went thru issues with a 2015 Ram 1500 with the eco diesel. The whole engine went out at 30k and then none stop issues after that. I was hoping to do better going back to Chevy! Ed are going to watch it and see how it does, if it gives us more trouble we will trade it in.

Nomad24 Enthusiast

Nomad24

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On 3/19/2022 at 11:05 AM, 20Denali21 said:

Off topic, but what was the build date on your TB?

I’ll check when it’s out of the shop, I picked it up February of 2021 so will assume a 2020 build.

  • 4 weeks later...
Grumpy Bear Senior Enthusiast

Grumpy Bear

Posted
Posted
On 3/19/2022 at 7:08 PM, voided3 said:

Even without the manufacturing defect that affected our batch of engines, the lifters will most likely fail between 60,000 and 80,000 miles under normal use, anyway, due to the poor design.

 

😬

 

Guy visits his doctor for the after colonoscopy review. Doc says, "Great news. No cancer was found". 

Guy smiles.

Doc continues, "But that was last week. No telling what happened since then. Better do it again"

We did the procedure correctly but the procedure is poorly designed and thus the test results are "likely" to fail.

In about a week.

 

So we are saying that Even without the manufacturing defect the lifters will most likely fail between 60,000 and 80,000 miles under normal use? And then add due to the poor design. 

 

We made the part correctly but the part is poorly designed thus it not only will fail, I can tell you when it will fail?

 

🥴

 

A Prophet indeed.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Nomad24 Enthusiast

Nomad24

Posted
  • Author
Posted

We decided we no longer have confidence in the truck! We ended up with 4 lifters replaced and I had no interest in waiting to see if 12 more would go out and leave us stranded again. Zero interest from GM to make it right and I have been working with GM customer service to try and get reimbursed for hotel and gas. Apparently once you have an agent assigned you can’t get a new one and mine has taken 3 weeks to get no where (I have requested a supervisor call me but that has not happened yet). We are done with chevy and back with ford! I have more confidence in the 3.5 V6!

  • Haha 2
  • Sad 2
  • 2 weeks later...
WeGone Enthusiast

WeGone

Posted
Posted
On 4/12/2022 at 11:16 PM, Dirk Dingle Berry said:

Was your 2021 Trail Boss made in  Mexico?

 

The motors are not made in Mexico its just an assembly plant.

  • 6 months later...
nolimits76 Enthusiast

nolimits76

Posted
Posted

Just discovering these threads about lifter failure.  More research to do.  Are the lifter failures limited to 5.3's or are the 6.2's also experiencing them?  

 

Any chance this is tied to the early 2000 5.3 lifter issue?  Had lots of folks with those early models complaining about lifter tap on morning startup that sounded like "diesel chatter".  I think GM's fix was a glorified cap of some sort to eliminate the noise, but not a redesign.  I sold that truck and stepped away from GM until my AT4 purchase last year.  One of the reasons I went with the 6.2 was all that old history (probably/hopefully fixed, but didn't want a repeat).

Gangly Senior Enthusiast

Gangly

Posted
Posted

The problem occurs throughout the 5.3 and 6.2 line up.  However, its a VERY small number, you just hear about it here because nobody goes online to shout "hey, the lifters on my new truck are working perfectly!".  My guess would be that the number of lifter issues is probably within calculated acceptable thresholds for GM, we just hear about them the most because of this site.  However, I really don't know the numbers so my thoughts on the matter are pretty irrelevant. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
KARNUT Senior Enthusiast

KARNUT

Posted
Posted

You want to find more info about it. Type in your browser GM lifter failure or cylinder deactivation problems. It’s more than a little. Reminds me of my 04 Z71 speedometer problem. It wasn’t a problem they said but I couldn’t get one. Probably a year after I sold it I got a recall on it. 

Jim E Enthusiast

Jim E

Posted
Posted

Occurred at 20k on my 6.2.  I'm at about 22k now and it's been fine.  If anything, it's running better and I previously had a lifter tick, that is gone as well.

 

One of the other topics has more details, but this doesn't appear to be a lifter design issue, but an issue with one of the sources or batches of the lifters.  

 

Id expect this to be a much bigger problem if it was actually a design issue.

Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jim E said:

Occurred at 20k on my 6.2.  I'm at about 22k now and it's been fine.  If anything, it's running better and I previously had a lifter tick, that is gone as well.

 

One of the other topics has more details, but this doesn't appear to be a lifter design issue, but an issue with one of the sources or batches of the lifters.  

 

Id expect this to be a much bigger problem if it was actually a design issue.

I read somewhere awhile back ago that it was bad batch's of lifters and components that were not heat treated properly which led to their failure. If it was a bad design then this would be massive. The 5.3 and 6.2 motor could have been built way before being put in the truck or SUV and sitting in stock waiting to be installed.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Black02Silverado
      Post your UOA, (used oil analysis) here

      By Black02Silverado · Posted

      Here's the second UOA on my 22 Wrangler with the Ecodiesel. This has 5k miles on AMSOIL Signature Series DEO 5w-40. The first one was dealer installed oil, no clue what it was, the second is what AMSOIL recommended, European FS 5w-40, Most of the Ecodiesel world is showing great results using the European MS 5w-40, I figured I would see how the DEO works. This is using an Ecoguard oil filter. It's my understanding this engine likes to shed aluminum.  We will see. So far I don't think this is too bad.    
    • revmanii
      Disable DRL's

      By revmanii · Posted

      I'm surprised nobody seems to offer a solution like the start/stop device I put in my new truck. Remembers my setting when shutdown. And while it still starts up in start/stop, it stores/evaluates what mode it was in when shut down and will change it whithin a second or 2 of startup. It'd be nice to have something like that for the DRLs.
    • btm
      Sunroof Drain Hole Entry & Exit Location (w/ Pictures)

      By btm · Posted

      2015 Sierra 1500 here. Leaks from the sunroof to front driver side and soaks carpet. How do I fix this? Thanks!
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      I will be doing that for sure, but I need to solve who has/ where I can find a bidirectional scan tool that will support OBD 1.5. I'm kicking myself because I ebay'ed a Snap On MT2500 that I didn't think I'd ever need anymore. D'oh!! I'd rather not buy another, so I'll contact a few local shops to see if they have one and how much they'd want to do the procedure. I'd rather have the ability to do it myself... I wish there was a modern tool that could do it all, but I'd have no idea what to buy.   The theory with the pulled timing is that it mimics a rich condition. The delayed spark causes incomplete burn and the O2 sensor picks up low oxygen levels. That's interpreted as a rich condition so the PCM pulls fuel and that shows up in the deeply negative fuel trims.
    • Chuck FB
      Joke Thread

      By Chuck FB · Posted

      An ultra wealthy man had the most beautiful daughter. But, there was a problem. Everything she touched would melt in her hands. No matter what, Metal, Wood, Stone. Anything she touched would melt. She could not feed herself. Because of this, men were afraid of her. Nobody would dare marry her. Her father was despaired. What could he do to help his daughter? He consulted doctors, scientists and anybody who could solve this problem. Finally one of them said, "If your daughter touches one thing that does not melt in her hands, she will be cured." He was overjoyed and came up with a plan. The next day, he held a competition. Any man who could bring his daughter an object that would not melt in her hands would be given billions of dollars to marry her. Three extremely intelligent and handsome young men took up the challenge. The first brought a very heavy steel rod, But alas, when the she touched it, it completely melted in a matter of seconds. He sadly went away. The second brought a beautiful diamond, knowing diamonds were one of the hardest substance in the world and would not melt. But alas, once she held it in her hand, it melted. He too was sent away disappointed. So now, there was one left He was very nervous & sweating. He approached the daughter & said, “put your hand in my pants pocket and feel what is in there." She did exactly what he asked. She felt something very hard. She held it in her hand, squeezing it as hard as she could. It did not melt & remained extremely hard. Her father was overjoyed. Everybody was overjoyed. She was finally cured. Nothing never, ever melted in her hand again. They married and they both lived happily ever after, raising a wonderful family. Question: What was in the the groom’s pants pocket??? Answer below ↓ M&Ms of course! They melt in your mouth, not in your hand. What on earth were you thinking?

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...