Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey all, 

 

Somewhat new to the forum, but I've been stalking posts to stay up to date. Having an issue and wondered if anyone has come across this and any solutions the community may have found. 

 

Long story short, is that I drove through a flooded parking lot in June. Water barely came up to the rockers and after driving about 500 feet at about 10-15 MPH, there was a steering system alert, and then an oil pressure alert shortly after. Truck was towed to the dealer I purchased it from and was initially told it was covered, but after tearing down, was told there was water in the intake that caused the engine to hydro lock and blow out a rod. I had no choice but to have the insurance cover the repair and get a reman engine installed from GM. Just got the truck back, but can't help but feel that it's really a truck made of glass if i can't drive a trail truck (obviously understanding that it's really not a true trail truck) and traverse a stream or creek that's 2-3 foot deep without fear of ruining the motor. 

 

I called Chevy and got the run around that it was an act of God and that they simply would not cover it. Again, I knew that's what would happen but figured it was worth a shot. In either case, I'm between dumping it (looking at about $45k and some equity if I do) and keeping it. If I do keep it, I have to think there would need to be a replacement intake installed. I'm wondering if anyone has run across this type of situation and any solutions you may have come up with whether that's a recommended intake system, air scoop modification or waterproofing or if you had luck with Chevy in this type of situation. Sorry for the lengthy story, but unfortunately that's about as short as I can make it. Thanks all in advance and I hope you all can help.

  • Sad 1
Posted

Sucks that this happened.  The water must have been pushed pretty good up into the intake system for it to pass through the panel air filter and make it's way into the engine.  The only thing is to make your own snorkel set up some how or block off where it gets the air from  in front and have it only get it from high inside the engine compartment.  Not ideal but if you do this kind of driving then that would be what it would take I guess.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

10-15 MPH might have been a bit too fast. Water can and will find its way into almost everything, especially if it is forced upwards in hefty quantities. My guess is that some of the hose clamps in the intake may have been loose or the intake manifold had a gasket that didn't seal completely and a decent quantity of water got splashed around the engine bay. I can't see an easy way that water made its way all the way through the stock airbox (although completely possible) and into the motor though if all the gaskets and hose clamps were within spec and the PCV system wasn't compromised.

Edited by jaxcam02
Posted

They aren't glass, 15mph is barreling through the water that was a foot and a half deep. Jeeps do that and have issues, that is on you, you just went too fast for that deep. I have been deeper than my bumper with my K2 without an issue. 

 

Tyler

  • Thanks 1
Posted

It's not a boat and you're not alone. This has happened many times including to my son. Too fast. Snorkel is the best option. 

Posted
36 minutes ago, Black02Silverado said:

Sucks that this happened.  The water must have been pushed pretty good up into the intake system for it to pass through the panel air filter and make it's way into the engine.  The only thing is to make your own snorkel set up some how or block off where it gets the air from  in front and have it only get it from high inside the engine compartment.  Not ideal but if you do this kind of driving then that would be what it would take I guess.

It was definitely weird. I never saw water come up over the hood during the drive through the water and figured it was getting pushed away from the truck as I saw some spray. Additionally with a seal from the upper radiator trim to the hood, it seemed less likely to happen. The truth is, I don't drive it off road much at all so an aftermarket option could work if it had a deep lower section so if water did get in, it could puddle up in there. Not that I'd want it to, but maybe a drain hole could be made for it. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Black02Silverado said:

Sucks that this happened.  The water must have been pushed pretty good up into the intake system for it to pass through the panel air filter and make it's way into the engine.  The only thing is to make your own snorkel set up some how or block off where it gets the air from  in front and have it only get it from high inside the engine compartment.  Not ideal but if you do this kind of driving then that would be what it would take I guess.

Or slow down when wading a truck? 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, customboss said:

Or slow down when wading a truck? 

Please read the post. I’m not looking for driving advice here and certainly not the criticism of the situation. I have a driver’s license and the lesson is learned. If you’ve had experience with an air intake that works given the situation, I’d love the input. If not, keep it to yourself. 

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Ryan S. said:

Please read the post. I’m not looking for driving advice here and certainly not the criticism of the situation. I have a driver’s license and the lesson is learned. If you’ve had experience with an air intake that works given the situation, I’d love the input. If not, keep it to yourself. 

No offense intended. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

...................

Edited by elcamino
Posted (edited)

it came up to the rockers and you hydrolocked it, i think you where deeper than you imagine,  the air intake is about headlight level

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
Posted

Yep, you can build up a pretty good wall of water in front. I could see by looking at mine water could get funneled up pretty high in the grill. You could take a stock box, seal the factory inlet and any holes, then maybe open the backside of it for air intake. Won't really be a cold air box anymore

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, txab said:

Yep, you can build up a pretty good wall of water in front. I could see by looking at mine water could get funneled up pretty high in the grill. You could take a stock box, seal the factory inlet and any holes, then maybe open the backside of it for air intake. Won't really be a cold air box anymore

It was mentioned that being up to the rockers would mean it was near headlight level. This isn't remotely the case. There's at least 1'-1 1/2' distance between the two. In either case, this sounds like a decent idea although losing cooler air could be an issue. The snorkel is intriguing although there's no real options that I wouldn't have to build myself and I don't want to have to cut the fenders and with the air box on the driver's side this could be an engineering feat I'm not equipped to address. Definitely worth some more investigation. Thanks for the suggestion. 

Posted
5 hours ago, pokismoki said:

it came up to the rockers and you hydrolocked it, i think you where deeper than you imagine,  the air intake is about headlight level

There's easily a foot or more distance between the rocker and the middle of the headlight.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Lake Speed is drumming up business for his company just by being in the spot-light so he has a vested interest in stoking the 0W-20 fire.  IMO  
    • I knew when I bought my truck that it had off road hill decent or craw control or whatever they call it and rolled my eyes at that but it gets throw on with other options my truck has, I just never had a heads up if the highway speed regular cruise setting had anything to do with the brakes and that took me by surprise. If you've ever been to the top of Pikes Peak and watched those ahead of you on the way down with their brake lights on constantly, one can guess they are probably not gearing down or not enough anyway if their vehicle will allow and a good reason their is a brake check spot part way down where they use an infra red heat gun to check how hot ones brakes are front and rear.    Your right that once one gets out of the front range by Denver and I've not been on that stretch of 285 between Denver and Fairplay myself but I know its high and Fairplay at 10000 feet, Buena Vista at 8000, it drops a bit from there but then your going back up and over the 11000 pass and Durango is at 6500 . So yes your definitely right that 6500 and a lot higher is the theme of going anywhere out in that direction from Denver but hey, the down hill sections give fantastic fuel mileage !.    I don't even look at the fuel pumps for what premium costs here, since I live on a farm and up to this point get fuel delivered I am rarely in front of a fuel pump and when I am, I am often using card lock bulk fuel stations so it tells me what the price is AFTER I buy the fuel. Looking up on gas buddy and converting to US gallons but in Canadian dollars, regular on average of the prices listed was around 5.95 and premium is around 7.00 . That was one reason I did not go for the 6.2 half ton aside from its lack of carrying/towing if one was going by the rule of using premium fuel and until recently one could only buy regular farm gas if playing the few cents off game for farm dyed fuel for a "farm licensed pickup". But yes I hear you on the fuel price difference and like the diesel theme with it often being more expensive then gas it doesn't have quite the charm to it either as it once did although right now here for some reason the price of diesel has come down more so its now inline with the price of regular gas. 
    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...