Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just curious who's got 100k or 200k on their 8 speed? Just getting my truck paid off now and at 74k miles, really worrying about the long-term reliability of the 8 speed and wondering if I should trade now while it's still worth something. Had a new valve body at 18k and the new mobil 1 atf at 54k to solve the shuddering. All good so far since  🤞 

Posted

Subbed.  I only have 43k on mine.  Had a temperature sender replaced and updated fluid to solve shuttering around 30k.    

  • Like 1
Posted

Have just over 300,000 my 2018 no problems yet. I just have regular  schedule  matinace  done

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bill Gutman said:

Have just over 300,000 my 2018 no problems yet. I just have regular  schedule  matinace  done

That is incredible. I love to hear that.

Posted
On 4/3/2023 at 11:50 AM, NWI Denali said:

Just curious who's got 100k or 200k on their 8 speed? Just getting my truck paid off now and at 74k miles, really worrying about the long-term reliability of the 8 speed and wondering if I should trade now while it's still worth something. Had a new valve body at 18k and the new mobil 1 atf at 54k to solve the shuddering. All good so far since  🤞 

I don't have the 8 speed I have the 6 speed mine,it is a 2015. Want to keep mine for another year and worry about the same thing

 I'm at 107,000 now still seems to be fine. (I know your question was about the 8 speed....just getting at I worry about the same thing)

  • Like 1
Posted

Just hit 60K the other day in my 2018 Sierra, 8 speed. Ive got another year and its paid off so I'll probably be about the same mileage as you are right now when that time comes. 😉  Other than the usual noises when going in and out of reverse, I dont have any complaints. Shifting is nice and smooth when she's going. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, 15 Z71 said:

BTW......which one is has the least problems the 8 or the 6 speed?

The 6 and 10 speeds are both way less troublesome than the 8 speed

Posted

I'm at 230 000 km on my 2015.  It's clunky (especially when I put it in reverse) but still doing the job.

  • Like 3
  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

117k on my 2017. Fluid update change and a temp sensor replaced

Edited by Custom 68
  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
Posted

Well, I'll chime in here.  On my 2015 8L90 today I passed 350,000 miles .   Its a Yukon XL Denali.  I change the fluid and filter every year. about every 42,000 miles.  Seems to operate well, about 95% of the time.

Thanks.

mrctx.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/16/2023 at 8:35 PM, mrctx5000 said:

Well, I'll chime in here.  On my 2015 8L90 today I passed 350,000 miles .   Its a Yukon XL Denali.  I change the fluid and filter every year. about every 42,000 miles.  Seems to operate well, about 95% of the time.

Thanks.

mrctx.

Holy crap, I think you win lol

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
    • And use RA's 5% discount code if you buy from them.  google for the code, one is always available.
    • Just don't turn the steering wheel as much?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...