Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm curious if there's any thoughts, pros-cons out there on these services offered at some places.

 A former boss of mine took his new truck to this place and had it done where they spray rust proofing through all the nooks and crannies without making more holes and a underbody spray on coating that covers everything - The place has been in biz a long time, do good work and run it right, good employees.

 I took his advice since he's had new vehicles done there for like 15 years. They offered a pkg deal of a paint protectant (I went with the polymer option) the rust proofing and under body rust prevention/sound deadening coating. It was sticky as hell, still is kind of but have to say, it looks amazing with everything static coated, just has to make a difference.

I got all that done for 8 bills when my dealer want 9 just for the paint protection that sounds about the same. I met with the owner and told him, got this new truck I'm picking up in a couple days and tell me what I need to know to make a good decision. A good sign is when instead of selling you something, he asked a lot of questions and based on my habits, use and all that he ruled out lots of things much more expensive and said "if it was my money, this is the route I would go in your situation" ~ That's being a consultant more than a salesman. Anyone can take your money but will they always spend it in your best interest? 

 One of my bullet points of trading in my 2016 were the notorious rusty rear fender wells. I figure with the fender poly trim on the GMC and inner liners along with the rust proofing job, don't know what else I could do to preserve it. 

Posted

I use fluid film on mine. The application gun is less than $50 and I can do a full size truck with a gallon and a half ($40 per gal) 

The easiest way to coat the wheel arches on the bed is by removing the tail lights and spraying forward on to the area. They also have several plugs on the inner bed side that can be removed to the inside surface of the outer panel and really soak the wheel arch. My gun has a straight hose and a 360 spray hose along with the regular nozzle. 

I have found that enough plugs are in the body to do all the critical areas like this plus the rockers. 

The fluid film has to be touched up every year or 2 in the high spray areas such as around wheels etc. 

I do like the fact that it migrates and doesnt harden although its best to park it on a area of the driveway that youre not concerned about making a mess on for a week or 2 after application. 

  • Like 4
Posted

I also used fluid film in a very similar way to 64BA. These trucks have a lot of plugs which is handy. I did all the ones on the rockers and also popped them out of the bed and shot down into them all over. Also did the wheel wells before installing wheel well liners. 
I did mine with my gun at about 80psi. I did it parked over grass and let it sit a few hours. 
 

also, I’ve tested a few small areas on the actual frame with fluid film and in my experience, it has done literally nothing as far as removing the wax coating. It’s still there and no change to the wax. Been about 8mo on there now. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Pryme said:

I also used fluid film in a very similar way to 64BA. These trucks have a lot of plugs which is handy. I did all the ones on the rockers and also popped them out of the bed and shot down into them all over. Also did the wheel wells before installing wheel well liners. 
I did mine with my gun at about 80psi. I did it parked over grass and let it sit a few hours. 
 

also, I’ve tested a few small areas on the actual frame with fluid film and in my experience, it has done literally nothing as far as removing the wax coating. It’s still there and no change to the wax. Been about 8mo on there now. 
 

I had it on my 2021 for about 18 months and it did not negatively effect the wax coating on the frame, if anything it kept it from hardening. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Didn't think about fluid film, but I've used it a fair amount for different things.

 

 So they told me that I'd see some of the goo oozing out and that's normal. Yep, it did. It's not like fluid film, it's a thick snotty goop for sure. 

 All this stuff comes with "warranties" which I don't put much faith in from these 3rd party operations. A wise old regional manager of mine once aid "If the product you're selling is worth buying, you shouldn't have to rely on the merits of it's warranty" .... But I've got some ideas of snooping around just to make sure what I paid for got done. 

Posted

Avoid Ziebart.

 

Fluid Film is fine but it can soften the wax dip on the frame.  Waxoyl is another good option, so is Boeshield.  

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/17/2023 at 12:37 PM, newdude said:

Avoid Ziebart.

 

Fluid Film is fine but it can soften the wax dip on the frame.  Waxoyl is another good option, so is Boeshield.  

Great info and I agree with your take on these.

 

Best rustproofing I ever did was moving 1100 miles south of St. Cloud, MN a decade ago. 🤣🤣🤣

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
10 hours ago, the8rotor said:

Great info and I agree with your take on these.

 

Best rustproofing I ever did was moving 1100 miles south of St. Cloud, MN a decade ago. 🤣🤣🤣

That was a byproduct of moving from New Jersey to Texas over 40 years ago. 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/17/2023 at 12:27 PM, Leonardo Willi said:

Didn't think about fluid film, but I've used it a fair amount for different things.

 

Anything lanoline based. Fluid Film is one. Many others. PB Blaster Surface Shield. Wool Wax.....

  • Like 1
Posted

i decided to use industrial cosmoline on my 24 truck ,i have been doing my own trucks since my first new one in 1988. for years i have used a clear inner panel material that creeps and never really dries and a rubberized material over the waxed frame. the solvent percentage in it is rather low and it never attacked the wax formula from GM. it is made by a company called rusfre and  had excellent results on quite a few trucks over the years .

 

i decided to change it up this time to get away from the rubberized version and wasn't interested in fluid film, i did consider wool wax but just wanted something that was a little neater to work around so i started to research different versions of the cosmoline product mainly looking at the amount of solvent in each product so it would be safe with the original GM wax. i thought the cosmoline would work well since it is a wax base product that never dries totally but does dry firm, not hard like rubberized material and it isn't as messy to work around as some of the other products out there.  it works well inside and outside for the frame and also seems to spray thin enough to get into the body seems. it comes in a amber color and i tinted it slightly with charcoal powder to darken it a little. the amount of solvent percentage  allows it to work safely over the GM original hot wax. i ended up with a product from a company called Tectyl. the product name is Tectyl 846 which is a direct cross for industrial cosmoline 342 with the same mil spec. it sprayed nicely through the gun and had to thin it a little for use with the wands. didn't have any effect on rubber or connectors. i do stay away from the rear leaf spring bushings because i have had issues with rust proofing causing rear spring noise. clean up is super easy and it even smells good.   

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, jd64 said:

i decided to use industrial cosmoline on my 24 truck ,i have been doing my own trucks since my first new one in 1988. for years i have used a clear inner panel material that creeps and never really dries and a rubberized material over the waxed frame. the solvent percentage in it is rather low and it never attacked the wax formula from GM. it is made by a company called rusfre and  had excellent results on quite a few trucks over the years .

 

i decided to change it up this time to get away from the rubberized version and wasn't interested in fluid film, i did consider wool wax but just wanted something that was a little neater to work around so i started to research different versions of the cosmoline product mainly looking at the amount of solvent in each product so it would be safe with the original GM wax. i thought the cosmoline would work well since it is a wax base product that never dries totally but does dry firm, not hard like rubberized material and it isn't as messy to work around as some of the other products out there.  it works well inside and outside for the frame and also seems to spray thin enough to get into the body seems. it comes in a amber color and i tinted it slightly with charcoal powder to darken it a little. the amount of solvent percentage  allows it to work safely over the GM original hot wax. i ended up with a product from a company called Tectyl. the product name is Tectyl 846 which is a direct cross for industrial cosmoline 342 with the same mil spec. it sprayed nicely through the gun and had to thin it a little for use with the wands. didn't have any effect on rubber or connectors. i do stay away from the rear leaf spring bushings because i have had issues with rust proofing causing rear spring noise. clean up is super easy and it even smells good.   

 

 

 

 

Any pics on your truck? What does it look like applied?

 

looks like it’s 95/gal. 
 

I’ve considered buying the actual wax gm uses for touch ups from daubart chemical. 

Edited by Pryme
Posted
22 hours ago, Pryme said:

Any pics on your truck? What does it look like applied?

 

looks like it’s 95/gal. 
 

I’ve considered buying the actual wax gm uses for touch ups from daubart chemical. 

 

 

 

sorry i didn't take any pictures during the process, 

 this is what i used        https://petroleumservicecompany.com/tectyl-846-class-i/                  it is the same mil spec and class as the original industrial rust veto 342 cosmoline made by Houghton Products For Metal Protection who is the original manufacturer from the late 1800's and still making it today of course by the new EPA rules 

 

petroleum service company also sells the daubert wax that GM recommends for the frame wax repair in their TSB if you want to keep the edges of the frame touched up instead of doing the whole truck.

..

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I'm not really interested in doing something like this myself. So I just use Krown. I have had good experiences with them. It's not that expensive (to me) and well worth the cost over the time and work it would take me to do it myself.

I didn't get it this year since I just bought my truck in January. But I'll have it done before next winter.

Posted
On 5/21/2023 at 9:03 PM, the8rotor said:

Great info and I agree with your take on these.

 

Best rustproofing I ever did was moving 1100 miles south of St. Cloud, MN a decade ago. 🤣🤣🤣

You got out of St. Cloud before it got bad there. I know that area and it was sad to see that area decline so much over the years. 

Posted

Has anyone used CRC rust inhibitor spray on their truck? Based on various independent reviews, it seems that stuff is the best DIY stuff right now. I've used it on all my previous vehicles and not once had an issue. This is my first Chevy, so I'm not sure if that affects anything Chevy already does to the truck. Is it beneficial recoating the frame?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m out of ideas on this truck. 2020 Silverado 1500. 5.3 135,000 miles. Has a p0308 and p050d codes. Smokes From exhaust when cold. Compression test passed. New plugs, wires and coil on cyl 8. Same issue. New coil on 8, no change. Replaced injectors, no change. Bore scope showed oil pooled on the piston after sitting overnight. Pulled head and had machine shop check it out. No cracks. Stem seals looked good, replaced anyways. He also ground valve seats. Put it all back together and still have the same issue. Bore scope shows oil on the piston again. Leaning towards maybe a cracked ring but unsure. Cylinder looked good when the head was off, no scoring or scratches. Any ideas on what else I should look for?  Appreciate the help 
    • Just want to make sure it is covered by Special Coverage N232395310 Evaporative Emission Purge Pump 2021 Silverado 1500 Custom 2.7L L3B ~100k miles I'm getting DTCs P146B and P146F. VIN 3GCPWBEK2MGxxxxxx   I spoke to a person that works at GM and he said it is not covered after checking my VIN.   Is there anyone here who currently works for a GM/Chevrolet dealership and has access to GM Global Warranty Management / Investigate Vehicle History who could explain how the VIN eligibility is determined?   thank you    
    • Thanks for all that information, I might purchase one and see if it will work for me, if not they may let me return it! Yes for sure the tires are definitely within limit for my truck empty, and when I do tow I'll definitely make sure to raise the rear psi for the amount of weight that's going to be on it.
    • Yes exactly, more and more these days people/companies are afraid of liability issues so its easier just to say no rather than risk putting their neck on the line.    I will say with the Autel unit or when I used it last year on my truck, it wasn't like I could choose the 2025 model year or even the 2024 model year as that option was not there to manipulate the placard pressures but had to go back to 2023 or there abouts and then it showed up as an option, odd but that was how the software was then and I can't say one way or the other now as they throw out updates every so often. I still would talk to your tire dealer though to start with and they may do it for nothing but also they may have a comment on a better unit to purchase. All I know is that one of the large tire shops in my area happens to use these Autel units for their use and set them up to use the wifi and all of that jazz for constant updating because each tire tech has one handed to them by the shop but I just plugged it into my laptop to update it and yes if one is bought it has to be registered so you can get the link to do updates and then the unit has to be updated before its even used. I am not at all techy so it took me a bit but anyway just a heads up for anything you buy, most likely it will need to be connected to a computer to access the internet to have it updated to the latest software version before you can put it to use.   If your truck is near empty, those tire pressures you listed are a very safe upper range pressures to carry the weight, both the front and rear as I know they could be run lower yet with an empty truck. And if its a trailer and not some motorcycle your going to strap onto the front of your truck on a rack, you shouldn't have a need to inflate your front tires if your at 55 front already, its the rear ones that would need more air if you have much hitch weight. 
    • Thank you, I'll check that Autel scanner out and see if it will work for me! Ya I can see GM's point of view if they lower the psi set value for someone and the person sell's the truck and the new owner puts the factory tires back on then their could be liability issues cause the psi warning light wasn't coming on when the tires were under inflated for towing their load and then it might be able to be traced back to GM lowering it.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...