Jump to content

2014 5.3 cat's plugged? limp mode under load at 3000 rpm

4banger
 Share

Recommended Posts

4banger Enthusiast

4banger

Posted
Posted (edited)

My buddies truck, he's on a budget so looking for more info on this, the stealership wants $4900 cad to fix. 

 

Here's what happens, towing the cargo trailer, gets to about 80-90 kmh (50 mph) and try to push it any harder or when hills come and needs to add power it goes into limp mode and speeds drop right off, seems to be around 3000 rpm, runs great under that, throw the hazards on and limp up the hills getting passed by everyone. He loves his truck and even more that it got him home from a long hunting trip even thought it was a slower trip home dealing with this.

 

What's the cheapest easiest solution? He has a mechanic that can do most things but was having trouble figuring it out so took to dealership who said it was cat's and it will be near $5k fix.

 

shoot just realized I dropped this into the wrong sub-forum?

Edited by 4banger
Bikerjon Enthusiast

Bikerjon

Posted
Posted

Create an opening in the exhaust before the converters. Plugged/restricted converters will cause excessive back pressure in the exhaust system. I would suggest loosening the nuts on the studs at the exhaust manifolds except that they will be rusted solid and probably break off causing you more problems. I have used a hack on older vehicles when I knew the converters were plugged. Torch a couple holes in the exhaust pipes before the up stream converters to relieve the back pressure, You can then test drive the truck and verify the condition. I am not suggesting that you use this hack but I have done this successfully on some older vehicles. You could then decide if you drive the truck in this condition or replace the cats. $4900.00 sounds like a hell of alot of money for this repair. I bet a good exhaust shop could do this for a lot less with after market cats.

  • Like 1
Silverado4x4 Senior Enthusiast

Silverado4x4

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, Bikerjon said:

Create an opening in the exhaust before the converters. Plugged/restricted converters will cause excessive back pressure in the exhaust system. I would suggest loosening the nuts on the studs at the exhaust manifolds except that they will be rusted solid and probably break off causing you more problems. I have used a hack on older vehicles when I knew the converters were plugged. Torch a couple holes in the exhaust pipes before the up stream converters to relieve the back pressure, You can then test drive the truck and verify the condition. I am not suggesting that you use this hack but I have done this successfully on some older vehicles. You could then decide if you drive the truck in this condition or replace the cats. $4900.00 sounds like a hell of alot of money for this repair. I bet a good exhaust shop could do this for a lot less with after market cats.

I just dont understand this reply just to see if your cats are plug by drilling holes or torching holes

in the exhaust pipe before the cat now you have ruined the exhaust system by doing that and have to replace the pipe instead of just replacing the cat. Say the cat is not plugged now you have to fix what you did, if the cat is plugged now you have to replace the cat and the exhaust pipe. To me that not the way to do it to see if you have a plugged cat.

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Limp mode always throws a code, I would want to know what that code is before jumping into any repairs.

 

And you'd know if the cats were plugged if you just took a temp gun to the exhaust or if they started glowing red at night.

  • Like 1
Kevin0311 Enthusiast

Kevin0311

Posted
Posted

cheap scan tool (accutron) can watch the 4 o2 pre/post cat temps, my 14 needed cats oem setup was expensive took a chance on napa brand for less than half the cost has been fine for a year and few thousand miles. My codes were cat related codes even swapped 4 new o2 sensors before replacing to tripple check. i tried a can of catclean didn't work. mine didn't clog for no reason had other issues making it run rich for long time with check engine light on that was ignored.

Mshawn Enthusiast

Mshawn

Posted
Posted
On 11/11/2023 at 2:04 PM, mjm-1957 said:

If you suspect a clogged cat or restricted exhaust remove the front O2 sensors and road test.

After reading this post. Finally a correct step in the right direction in troubleshooting. You’re going to turn on the check engine lights and have to clear codes but if you remove the o2 and drive and it has a lot more power, yes the cats are plugged. I’m responding to this in the assumption that you do not have access to a quality scanner. Anyway from there you can decide what to do. I would call a few exhaust shops get a price on aftermarket converters.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • James Beyer
      Trading 7.3 (Godzilla) for G.M.C gas

      By James Beyer · Posted

      Congratulations Isttype, on your gmc. Really like my 2024 2500hd sle doublecab now with 85,500 miles.  I checked the oil today at 4800 miles since last oil change and barely reading on the stick.  I don't care if GM says it's Acceptable adding a quart every 2000 miles because that is 100% BS, It is not a 1966 Harley Shovelhead! Sounds like it's setting up a future failure like I had with my 1500 6.2l. Other than oil consumption problems, I really like the 6.6l gas and 10 speed is really nice.  Towed a light 4000 pound trailer last week and averaged 14 mpg.  I was pretty impressive that a 7300 pound gas truck did 14mpg towing, Later-
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Long Term Cold Cycle Limited Testing   Back to the 1990's and XOM's million mile test. Since then there have been others and there will be more. Schaeffer's, AMSOIL to name two. Of these Schaeffer's is the stand alone which I will explain in a bit later.    http://papers.sae.org/600190/:   http://papers.sae.org/850215/:   Up to 75% of  engine wear occurs on cold starts. These two links (above) provide the technical reasons for engine wear. In a nut shell, and by a large margin, cylinder wear is what takes out most motors and even with a pre-oiling system that part of the engine is dry enough on cold starts and cold warm up to pierce Stribeck.   So when you put a motor, or a car, on a dyno for a million miles stopping only for oil changes, (yes fuel is uninterrupted) or break down maintenance, you are depriving the test of the most important part of it's wear cycle. Yes a million is then a pretty easy walk even for a mineral oil under those conditions.    How about cleanliness during the long test cycles? Same thing. Varnishes that stick rings and insulate parts are laid down by repetitive 'heat cycles'. It's the cool down the precipitates the varnishes. These long runs also hinder acidic attack caused by cold start richness and less than optimal cold start ring sealing. They hinder water formation and enhance breathing of the crankcase; the petri dish of acid formation, the first step in sludge formation, amalgamation and precipitation. These motors are also monitored and controlled for water and oil temperatures to within the "normal operating range".      https://www.swri.org/sites/default/files/sequence-iiih-test.pdf Note the test sequence in some boutique oils literature for testing, API IIIH, is not the standard used for the ILSAC G7 testing. Does that mean it is irrelevant? No, not as used. As used as a 'visual guide' it makes it's point. The G7 weighted piston deposit minimum is lower.      Back to Schaeffer's. That was a cyclical test of an engine in fleet service and not a dyno mule and if you saw the video it was not mirror clean but wear was low.    There are oils like BioSyn and other 'Renewable" source oils that taught cleanliness and have proven themselves in fleet testing. Havoline an other example.    The newest ILSAC G-7 test prioritize cleanliness, LSPI mitigation and fuel economy OVER WEAR. In comparison Porsche C30 Specification Verses ILSAC G-7 Specification below:      Some will balk that this graph isn't apples to apples and I will challenge that in that this graph represent the SPECIFICATION and not the any One Oil Performance.   It is absolutely possible to minimize wear, maximize cleanliness and mitigate LSPI etc., It just isn't cheap and currently I see none that are not walking toward profit over performance.     
    • asilverblazer
      Intermittent no-code issues on 2022.5+ V8 trucks — what did the shop fail to capture?

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I don't think you will need a split, separate product, etc., the OBD port should be able to deliver everything you need. Since your device would be plugged into it all the time, it wouldn't miss anything.    Hardware in this case will be the easiest part of your project - ELM 327 devices will already deliver all the data you need. Reporting/software is where your advantage/marketability is.
    • Coastie05
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I do too. I’ll never be stuck again 😂
    • KARNUT
      2027 GMC Sierra: Official Discussion

      By KARNUT · Posted

      It has happened to me a few times. I carry a jumpstart-tire inflator with me.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...