Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is there any advantage to changing over to 5W-30 on my 6.2 after a hundred thousand miles? Have ran recommended 0w-20 for 107k miles.

Posted

The engine is mechanically the same as the Corvette 6.2l and that does use a higher viscosity oil so It should be fine.

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, Minnvmax said:

Is there any advantage to changing over to 5W-30 on my 6.2 after a hundred thousand miles? Have ran recommended 0w-20 for 107k miles.

 

Yes, HTHS viscosity. It's the thing that keeps parts from touching parts. There was an advantage on day one. There isn't a 'should be' to it; it's a "will be". 

 

As @Jay P pointed out, the motor in the Vette is the same motor in a different state of tune with an expectation of a harsher service. Allow me to translate that. The surface finish is the same. Same asperity heights so same requirement for minimum oil film thickness. (MOFT). 

 

The GM spec for 0W20 isn't based on MOFT. It's based on C.A.F.E. credits. EPA MPG numbers were obtained with that oil. 

 

More than you asked for information: 

 

The 0W20 C.A.F.E. spec it called out on the SAE minimum HTHS viscosity at 150 C that is assigned to the SAE Grade. It is the HTHS viscosity that the motor is most concerned with as this is the number seen in the ring/bore area and the fact that 40% of the wasted energy in a motor is a function of the oil's viscosity surrounding the ring package. There is even a predictive model for determining the difference in fuel economy based on the HTHS value of a specific oil. 

 

image.png.b5b54b66d16504e695325865e9f46a97.png

 

Thing is, there isn't a maximum value for any SAE Grade. There is only what is possible in that for a given SAE Grade to meet the min/max viscosity spec at 100C/212F there is only so far the range can be formulated to exceed the minimum HTHS value. That said, there are formulations that meet the *W20 spec at 100C that also meet the *W30 spec for HTHS! Red Line HP 5W20, High Performance Lubricants No-VII Euro 5W20 to name but two. 

 

Here's the thing. The HTHS doesn't have nearly the effect on actual real world fuel economy that the first number of a multigrade oil has. That is the 0W* verses 5W* will move the mpg needle further than 5W20 verses 5W30. Why? Because in the real world of Joe Average trip length is so short that oil is always heating or cooling and rarely at steady state. Who cares about 1cSt at 150 F when the difference at 60F can be hundreds of even thousands of centistokes. It matters to the government because those 150C conditions are the conditions the test is set at but not to us because they are rarely the conditions we operate at. 

 

However, the 1cSt of 150C viscosity, HTHS, has a huge impact on bore/ring wear. 😉 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Haha 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

The GM spec for 0W20 isn't based on MOFT. It's based on C.A.F.E. credits. EPA MPG numbers were obtained with that oil

Oh poppy ******

Posted
On 4/7/2024 at 3:04 PM, Minnvmax said:

Is there any advantage to changing over to 5W-30 on my 6.2 after a hundred thousand miles? Have ran recommended 0w-20 for 107k miles.

To me there isn't any advantages for the most part that you will notice.  Considering where you live the 0w-20 is perfect.

 

Also, does it use oil?  How often do you change it?  Just curious.

Posted

Doesn't use oil. I change it between 7k and 8k with an oil filter change and a fresh quart around 5k.

Posted
9 hours ago, diyer2 said:

If it ain't broke.

Agree. Its been working for 107K. Would not hurt to change OCI to 5000.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 4/8/2024 at 2:32 PM, Black02Silverado said:

To me there isn't any advantages for the most part that you will notice.  Considering where you live the 0w-20 is perfect.

 

Also, does it use oil?  How often do you change it?  Just curious.

 

🤔

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The BORA 3/8" spacers arrived yesterday along with the extended lug nuts. I got the front wheels changed out today, but was overheated and covered in sweat so bad, I figured getting both front wheels done was a win, and took a cool shower. Hopefully, I'll go out tomorrow morning before it gets into the 80+ temps and do the backs. After getting the first wheel snugged up, I backed out one of the lug nuts then hand turned to count threads. I believe I stopped counting around 12-13, so I think I'm good there.    
    • My fullsize truck is averaging over 26mpg so I'm pretty happy with the increased fuel economy targets. When I had my gas Silverado (2020 5.3) it was averaging 21. Again, for a fullsize truck, that's very different from the 12-15 these things used to get 30 years ago.   Whine all you want, increased MPG is a good thing.
    • That is a fair point, and I think an OBD-first proof is probably the right next step. I agree that the value is not the hardware box by itself. The marketable part would be the software: always-on capture, baseline learning, event reduction, system-specific reports, and alerts. Also agreed that if an OBD device is always plugged in and has local storage, it should not miss the event in the same way that a scanner plugged in after the fact would. The only thing I would not want to assume yet is that an ELM327-class device gives all the late-GM data needed at the rate needed. Standard OBD live data, DTCs, freeze frame, Mode 6, VIN, and calibration information are definitely the right starting point. GDS2 also proves that a lot of useful ECM data can be viewed through the DLC without needing a DTC first. The question I need to test is whether the data needed for a useful GM V8 event report is actually available through the DLC, and at a useful sample rate: - misfire counts / roughness by cylinder - AFM/DFM state - oil pressure and oil temperature - fuel trims - voltage / reset context - U-codes and communication events - calibration / software information - whether these are standard PIDs, enhanced DIDs, Mode 6 data, GDS2-only data, or not available So I think the right benchmark is: 1. Build the OBD-only version first. 2. Keep it plugged in and logging locally. 3. Compare it against GDS2 / freeze frame / HP Tuners or another higher-end logger. 4. Measure which parameters are available and at what update rate. 5. Only justify ECM-side hardware if it captures useful evidence the OBD version cannot. So you may be right: the consumer product might simply be an always-plugged-in OBD event recorder with much better reporting. A question for you: when you say ELM327 devices can already deliver all the data needed, do you mean generic OBD Mode 01 data only, or GM enhanced data as well? For a useful GM V8 report, would generic OBD data be enough, or would you expect the tool to include enhanced items like misfire by cylinder, AFM/DFM state, oil pressure/oil temp, U-codes, and calibration information?
    • 87 down as low as $5.14 here... winning!
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...