Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 hours ago, M1ck3y said:

 

Right, I’m wondering how much my top speed will drop after changing gears…

 

In my GMT900 trucks, both steel and aluminum driveshafts are limited to 5,000 rpms.  Same for the steel front driveshaft.

 

If we assume the same applies to your generation truck, your driveshaft would be turning 4,977 rpms at 142 mph in 7th and 8th gear with the tires currently on your truck worn down to 2/32nds of an inch.  At 143 mph, the driveshaft would be turning 5,013 rpms.

 

With 3.73 gears your top speed is now 123 mph with the shaft turning at 4,973 rpms.

 

With 4.10 gears your top speed is now 112 mph with the shaft turning at 4,982 rpms.

 

Now having said that, we've seen on this and other forums many photos of aluminum driveshafts twisted into pieces when fellas took their K2 generation trucks to the magic number of 112 mph.  That's the speed several reported going when their shafts self-destructed.

 

We also have photographic evidence of a stock tired 2012 Yukon XL Denali going 143 mph or so and his driveshaft would have been turning about 5,400 rpms.

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, GETGONE said:

Unless you're tuned it won't matter anyways since it's electronically limited to 112mph.


I drive a 17, and it is tuned. I posted here because I’m trying to get as many knowledgeable responses as possible.

 

The driveshafts on k2’s go out 120 - 130. And I’ve read that the max tow trucks came with a lower top speed around 90 or something (down from 100). So I assumed it must have dropped because of the 3.42 ratio. Which is a substantial drop for such a small change.

 

I was hoping someone would have specific information regarding my driveshaft. The shop I’m working with wasn’t much help.

 

 

 

Edited by M1ck3y
  • Like 1
Posted

I have a 21 with the 6.2 and have hit 112 NUMEROUS times so the driveshaft thing is BS on the T1 trucks. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Until I joined here I always thought the limit was because of the tires. All my trucks were tuned at the minimum. All had limits removed or moved up. Never had a drive shaft problem or a hint of vibration. Speed limits are high here people routinely cruise at 80 MPH. It hard to believe the driveshaft is out of balance enough to be close to explosion. And not be felt at cruising speeds of 70-80 MPH. I rarely went that fast in my trucks running aggressive high ply tires. The drive shaft never entered my mind. 

  • Like 1
Posted

The limit IS due to the tires. That's why trucks with the 18's have a 98mph top speed and the trucks with 20's have 112mph because of the tire's speed rating. S vs T.

  • Like 1
Posted

Like most rotating stuff that's balanced, it's balanced on a machine, to work up to a certain rpm.  Going just over that rpm doesn't mean it will vibrate, or fail, just that it is unknown as to what will happen.  As well, going faster also requires a lot more power that the driveshaft also has to handle, so it's both spinning faster than it was balanced for, as well as having a lot of torque applied to it.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/1/2025 at 8:00 PM, davester said:

Like most rotating stuff that's balanced, it's balanced on a machine, to work up to a certain rpm.  Going just over that rpm doesn't mean it will vibrate, or fail, just that it is unknown as to what will happen.  As well, going faster also requires a lot more power that the driveshaft also has to handle, so it's both spinning faster than it was balanced for, as well as having a lot of torque applied to it.

Doesn't balanced mean balanced?

I have not heard of anything being balanced by RPM etc, do you have an example of this?

I am happy to be educated on it if you can think of something.

TIA

Posted

A balancing machine spins an object up to a certain rpm, and then uses sensors to figure out if/how much it is out of balance at that speed, and what weights need to be placed where to get it balanced within some tolerance.

 

So, an wheel or a crankshaft for an F1 car gets spun up to a much higher RPM vs the ones for regular cars, to balance them, because they get spun up IRL that much faster.  The parts are balanced for any rpm up to those rpms, but if you get them going faster than that rpm, then smaller and smaller weight differences will cause vibrations.

 

The tire balancing machine at shops is a common example, it gets the tires up to a certain rpm to balance them.  Going past that rpm in real life, you may experience vibrations from the tire.  If the tire guy is doing his job right, he'll balance a tire for a Chevette at a much lower rpm compared to a Corvette.

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, davester said:

A balancing machine spins an object up to a certain rpm, and then uses sensors to figure out if/how much it is out of balance at that speed, and what weights need to be placed where to get it balanced within some tolerance.

 

So, an wheel or a crankshaft for an F1 car gets spun up to a much higher RPM vs the ones for regular cars, to balance them, because they get spun up IRL that much faster.  The parts are balanced for any rpm up to those rpms, but if you get them going faster than that rpm, then smaller and smaller weight differences will cause vibrations.

 

The tire balancing machine at shops is a common example, it gets the tires up to a certain rpm to balance them.  Going past that rpm in real life, you may experience vibrations from the tire.  If the tire guy is doing his job right, he'll balance a tire for a Chevette at a much lower rpm compared to a Corvette.

Exactly, just an example, driveshaft balanced up to 6000rpm with 1oz weight over 6000rpm that same 1oz weight turns into around 150lbs of force anything higher in rpm now the shaft is out of balance and will start the vibration as rpm increases it gets worse. Same goes for tire balancing as davester said.

Edited by Silverado4x4
  • Like 2
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

GM might decide to limit speed below the trating of the tires (for whatever reason).

 

Hard to believe they would even think about accepting the liability of having the vehicle speed limiter above the rating of the tires they installed.

 

Will tires fail immediately if rated speed is exceeded?  --- of course not . 

 

 

image.thumb.png.2c77f78362e9355d1c782acd3907bc78.png

Edited by redwngr
  • Confused 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Well, unfortunately they don't make Z rated all terrain tires..

In central Texas we have SH130, where the posted speed limit is 85 mph. And if you're going that slow, you need to stay to the right lane!Screenshot_20251106_193457_Chrome.thumb.jpg.75061b0ac81f032e51eca8647285d632.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 686 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...