Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What’s a reasonable price for replacing all four ball joints for a 2017 sierra 1500.  Local reputable shop quoted $2,400 for replacing all four control arms & ball with OEM parts.  Seems pretty steep to me, but they are OEM vs cheaper aftermarket and includes a 3 year 36k warranty. Does that sound high or reasonable?  

Posted

Did they give you printed quote?

 

What are they charging just for the parts and what is their labor rate?

 

Labor rate and part mark up is going to a huge factor here. Some shops are $150 an hour and others might be $200. You can do some digging here pretty easy to see how much things are going for. You could call a local dealer to price control arms as a walk in customer, then see what they are charging you for the same part.

 

Around here at many independents if the part is $100, you get charged $200 with the markup.

 

Also OEM isn't a must do. Other parts like MOOG or Delphi make good parts too.

  • Like 2
Posted

I paid $975 for labor. I provided parts. It was another $145 for alignment as I had to go somewhere else for that. Some shops will just quote hourly per part. I did find two that did not. They knew what hourly to drop from the quote as there was going to be in their anyway. 

Posted (edited)

Yes I got a printed quote. Labor is $1,275 (665 lower and 560 upper, both sides) and $1,060 parts ($150 each upper and $380 each lower). For OEM part prices seem within reason, from what im seeing, I’m just not sure how many  hours to divide the labor cost by.   They were pretty loose when they showed me so not doubting it needs done and glad I caught it now vs later but just trying to assess it that’s a reasonable price. It also includes an alignment. 

Edited by reardiff
Posted

Assuming you have stamped steel control arms for both, I came up with around $750ish for OEM parts if I bought them online. MOOG parts were between $400 and $500 depending on which arms you went with.

 

So their prices for parts sounds about right with mark ups. Hard to say on labor rates. The upper arms probably only call for 1.0-1.5hr each, I don't have the Mitchel catalog here at home to check that. The lowers are a little more involved because the strut bolts to them and there is added labor time for that. My street math put them in that $180 an hour or so figure.

 

I'd call around to a few places just to see what others may charge. With non OEM parts and cheaper labor rates you could be in this thing for probably $500 less.

Posted (edited)

The OEM arms carry a 2 year/Unlimited mileage warranty, not 3/36k.  Just FYI.  

 

That said, the ACDelco Gold upper arms they sell do have a limited lifetime warranty.  But they only offer the upper arms, not lowers in Gold.  

Edited by newdude
Posted (edited)

This topic is coming at the right time. I just had my oil changed at my regular dealership and in their inspection, they said the lower driver's side ball joint is starting to have some play and needs to be changed. I didn't get a quote in writing but was verbally told that it would be around $1200 to do but includes the alignment. Wow! I know it's going to cost me some money but based on what I'm seeing in this thread, that's sounds like way too much.

 

Would you agree? Also would it be cheaper overall to just have a new lower control arm with ball joint already installed be cheaper between the part and labor costs?

 

I had thought about doing the work myself but we still have several inches of snow on the ground with more on the way, arctic cold temperatures, and my garage just has no space to get the truck into it. So I would have to do it in the driveway. I just can't see myself doing it with all that going on. 

Edited by mikeyk101
Posted
6 hours ago, mikeyk101 said:

This topic is coming at the right time. I just had my oil changed at my regular dealership and in their inspection, they said the lower driver's side ball joint is starting to have some play and needs to be changed. I didn't get a quote in writing but was verbally told that it would be around $1200 to do but includes the alignment. Wow! I know it's going to cost me some money but based on what I'm seeing in this thread, that's sounds like way too much.

 

Would you agree? Also would it be cheaper overall to just have a new lower control arm with ball joint already installed be cheaper between the part and labor costs?

 

I had thought about doing the work myself but we still have several inches of snow on the ground with more on the way, arctic cold temperatures, and my garage just has no space to get the truck into it. So I would have to do it in the driveway. I just can't see myself doing it with all that going on. 

My first instinct would be to get a second opinion. I use the dealer because of their checklist. But I have found that they’re a little quick on the draw sometimes. You may have enough time to wait to do it yourself. There are times I use the dealer only for repairs. Front end work is straight forward regular auto shops would be experience in the work and cheaper. 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, KARNUT said:

My first instinct would be to get a second opinion. I use the dealer because of their checklist. But I have found that they’re a little quick on the draw sometimes. You may have enough time to wait to do it yourself. There are times I use the dealer only for repairs. Front end work is straight forward regular auto shops would be experience in the work and cheaper. 

 

I have an Indy shop about 2 blocks from my house that is very popular in the town so I will take your advice and reach out to them. And I agree on the checklist. Many times it is helpful. I always use the dealer for the oil changes as I found out a long time ago that it ends up not costing much more than doing it myself and is so much easier. And then there's a record so I can keep track. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, mikeyk101 said:

 

I have an Indy shop about 2 blocks from my house that is very popular in the town so I will take your advice and reach out to them. And I agree on the checklist. Many times it is helpful. I always use the dealer for the oil changes as I found out a long time ago that it ends up not costing much more than doing it myself and is so much easier. And then there's a record so I can keep track. 

I don’t feel like crawling around under my vehicles anymore. So the check list is handy. They even take pictures of worn bushings. And the oil changes are reasonably priced. I go every other oil change only because you have to make an appointment. And they take awhile. I go to a valvoline quick lube the other. I vetted them before. I do my own cabin filters and air filters. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, KARNUT said:

I don’t feel like crawling around under my vehicles anymore. So the check list is handy. They even take pictures of worn bushings. And the oil changes are reasonably priced. I go every other oil change only because you have to make an appointment. And they take awhile. I go to a valvoline quick lube the other. I vetted them before. I do my own cabin filters and air filters. 

 

Yes, I too take care of the cabin and air filters myself. Much cheaper and only takes a couple minutes. Same with wiper blades. This last time, they said the passenger wiper blade was torn and wanted to change it out. Nope, I'll check on that myself. I bought 2 new wiper blades on the way home. When I got around to checking the passenger blade, I couldn't see any tears which I thought was a bit strange. At least I am ready to change them when needed.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Quick update. I ended up taking the truck to a local Indy shop I trust 2 block from my place last week. They confirmed that the lower driver's side was bad and should be replaced. They also confirmed upper was ok as well as the upper and lower in passenger side were good. For the ball joint replacement and a front end alignment, it cost me $670 which was much more reasonable. 

 

I honestly don't notice any difference in handling but I figure that if 3 different places gave same diagnosis, it was going to need to be done sooner or later. At least I don't have to worry about it now.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I hope to high heaven this is wrong. My Chevy farm trucks frame is lasting way longer than a newer Nissan Titan XD I got for a steal, and it only pulls trailers. A decade younger and it's frame is already way rustier than the waxed Chevy I drive across longs and ditches. Also, hasn't Ford been having tones of troubles with rusted frames? 
    • Batteries don’t always show signs of a few years ago my vehicle started fine in the morning and took me to work. After work the battery was completely dead and I needed a jump. No, I didn’t leave anything on and the battery was only a couple months old. It was replaced under warranty. 
    • AFM is confirmed in the Corvette engine, so I'm assuming the higher volume trucks will get it as well
    • If his battery was that bad I would think it would have been showing signs before this that were ignored. Stinks that it happened the way it did in rush hour traffic, but this seems like a pretty fringe scenario. I don't mind it that bad and never turn it off. The only slight annoyance for me is the slight delay between brake to gas, but I have gotten used to it and figure if it can save a little gas why not.
    • That is a good correction. I think “severity” was probably the wrong word for what I meant. What I really mean is closer to event priority, relevance, and actionability — not “this code is severe” or “replace this part.” I agree that a truck can have a lot of trivial or historical communication codes, and if the product starts pushing alerts for every stored or low-value event, people will ignore it very quickly. So the alert logic would need to be filtered. For example, I would not want a random old communication code to generate a push notification by itself. A useful alert would probably need to be based on things like: - new vs historical - active vs stored - repeated vs one-time - duration of the event - whether it happened near the driver-marked symptom - whether it happened together with voltage drop, reset, bus-off, misfire, oil-pressure change, etc. - whether the same pattern repeats under similar conditions So instead of saying “severity,” maybe the product should organize events by affected system and priority. For example: Misfire event: Show misfire counts / roughness first, then fuel trims, RPM/load, DFM/AFM state if available, coolant/oil temp, voltage, and related DTCs. Oil-pressure event: Show oil pressure first, but only in context — RPM, load, oil temperature, coolant temperature, DFM/AFM state if available, voltage, and baseline comparison. Communication event: Show which module/network/message dropped, whether voltage dropped, whether the recorder reset, whether it was active or historical, and whether it repeated. Voltage/reset event: Show battery voltage, crank/wake/sleep state, module reset, communication dropouts, and what came back online first. That also solves the display-order problem you mentioned. The main report should not always show the same fixed list first. It should show the system that appears abnormal first, and then the supporting values for that system. I also agree that the truck already has an oil pressure gauge and MIL. The point would not be to duplicate those. The value would be in showing what else was happening before and after the warning or symptom. For example, if the MIL comes on for a misfire, the truck already told the driver there is a problem. The useful part would be: - which cylinder or bank looked abnormal first - whether it happened after an AFM/DFM transition - whether fuel trims were already moving - whether oil pressure or voltage changed at the same time - whether the same pattern happened previously without a MIL On the OBD port point, I think you may be right for a consumer-facing version. OBD is much easier for the average owner: - easier install - easier removal - inside the cabin - easier phone connection - easier data download - easier to include a pass-through port for another scanner OBD is also the right place for DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration information, Mode 6, and normal scan-tool parameters. The reason I was looking at ECM-side recording is that some events may be gone by the time someone plugs in a scanner, and some powertrain-side network evidence may not be available the same way through the DLC. But I agree that if an OBD-based version can capture enough useful evidence for most owners, that is probably the cleaner consumer product. Maybe the split is: - OBD/DLC version for most consumers - ECM-side version only if it proves it adds evidence that the OBD version cannot get - shop/pro version if deeper powertrain-side event evidence is actually useful So I would not want to force the inline approach if the OBD workflow solves most of the real-world problem. Your last point is probably the key product requirement: the report should be specific to the system showing the abnormality. Not “here are 50 parameters.” More like: “Misfire-related event detected. Here are the misfire/fuel/DFM/context values.” or “Oil-pressure-related event detected. Here is oil pressure compared with RPM/load/temp/baseline.” or “Communication event detected. Here is what dropped, when, and whether voltage/reset happened first.” That is a much better way to think about the report.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...